Page 4 of 26 FirstFirst ... 2345614 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 377

Thread: Could they make the Pontiac GTO any worse?

  1. #46
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Australia.
    Posts
    12,833
    Quote Originally Posted by Slicks
    Bingo!
    Thats exactly what happend. Lutz drove the car and fell in love with it. He wanted Pontiac to have a come back in the performance department, and what else says performance than "GTO". That name striked fear in the hearts of racers back in the day...
    The Monaro is undoubtably a very nice car, but in all respects doesnt deserve the GTO name. I agree, it should have been introduced as something different, maybe a Le Mans (baby GTO).
    I would even say it the other way around, The MONARO name is legendary in Australia, And maybe the GTO name doesn't deserve to be plasted on such a icon
    "Just a matter of time i suppose"

    "The elevator is broke, So why don't you test it out"

    "I'm not trapped in here with all of you, Your all trapped in here with me"

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    Quote Originally Posted by Luciferous
    Well I mean the weight was the only thing I was arguing, the tires were crap on Muscle Cars, and I'm pretty sure about 30% of the power was getting sucked up by the transmission alone....
    Well if Ford 9 inch diff's are anything to go by, then its quite possible. Many people only reccomend using one when your pushing serious figures as they suck up alot of power, so for moderate things they reccomend things like a Hilux 4x4 diff. i havent heard anything similar though for the likes of the Toploader, FMX and C4 though
    I am the Stig

  3. #48
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    2,666
    Quote Originally Posted by Luciferous
    Correct me if I'm wrong on this, but I was under the impression that Muscle Cars weighed F-all. In a comparison between a HK Munro and its current incarnation, I was surprised to see the HK undercut the 2002 model but 500kg, but I suppose it makes sense, no safety equipment or other crap they make you stick in cars these days...
    What do you mean "f-all"? Ive never heard that term before...

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Adelaide, Australia
    Posts
    2,496
    F-all(****all) means fairly light in weight,
    SA IPRA cars 15, 25, 51 & 77
    Sharperto Racing IP Corollas
    http://www.sharperto.com.au/

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    2,666
    Quote Originally Posted by SlickHolden
    I would even say it the other way around, The MONARO name is legendary in Australia, And maybe the GTO name doesn't deserve to be plasted on such a icon
    I know what your saying and thats what I would expect from some one who grew up with the Monaro. Truly the GTO was a car to be feared though. It ran faster times than the current US GTO in the 1/4 mile. People just expected more from a "GTO."

  6. #51
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    2,666
    Quote Originally Posted by charged
    F-all(****all) means fairly light in weight,
    lol oh thanks

    Well then i can answer the question.
    No, most muslce cars were over 3500lbs. "Pony cars" (cars that were not based off another car, hence dont use the "proper" name muscle car) were generally at or just under 3500lbs, like the Camaro and Mustang.

  7. #52
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    Quote Originally Posted by Slicks
    I know what your saying and thats what I would expect from some one who grew up with the Monaro. Truly the GTO was a car to be feared though. It ran faster times than the current US GTO in the 1/4 mile. People just expected more from a "GTO."

    Wouldnt surprise me in the least if you guys wouldnt be truly satisfied with another GTO that could get Sub-5 seconds 0-100kmh/0-60mph like the first tri-carb, in which case, simply taking our HSV GTO rather than making a mockery of the Monaro would be alot easier to do. Thats recently just pulled at 4.99 in an auto
    I am the Stig

  8. #53
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    check the pantry...
    Posts
    1,916
    wow, what a fugly car, i liked the clean lines of the original next gen. munro, this is just hideous. What is wif the yanks adding all this colour coding and unecessarry vents to the kits? and the embossed GTO on the rear is the worst, just put in a badge plz. Now that judge concept is one helluva car!
    House said the perfect woman was a man...now im all confused!!

    What is a mile long and hasn't had sex?
    - The line for the PS3

  9. #54
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    Maybe its something to lure some Mustang buyers
    I am the Stig

  10. #55
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Wrapped around a tree in Perth.
    Posts
    1,311
    Quote Originally Posted by Slicks
    lol oh thanks

    Well then i can answer the question.
    No, most muslce cars were over 3500lbs. "Pony cars" (cars that were not based off another car, hence dont use the "proper" name muscle car) were generally at or just under 3500lbs, like the Camaro and Mustang.
    Well yeah, that ain't that much weight-wise, Slicks. If you take a look at similar-sized vehicles nowadays they weigh a lot more. I would say the main culprit is the tyres and transmission, as I was saying before up to 30% of the power is getting chewed up by the trans (compared to about 17% now), and when the cars were around when radial tyres were big news you know they weren't anything special. I think when a test was done in a Valiant Charger (an Aussie version built by Chrylser subsidiary Valiant - Triple carbie 265 Hemi 6) they managed to shave half a second off the quarter mile just by putting on new tyres compared to the original style they came out on....

  11. #56
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Adelaide, Australia
    Posts
    2,496
    Yeah tyres make a big difference,cant see what the yanks are on about,the GTO fairly well flys,who cares about ,2 or .3 of a sec,you cant really feel that by the seat of your pants anyway
    SA IPRA cars 15, 25, 51 & 77
    Sharperto Racing IP Corollas
    http://www.sharperto.com.au/

  12. #57
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    To them it must be a big thing, i know Matra has before said that many in the US need to put a figure on something rather than judge it subjectively, and i have to agree with him considering they seem to be the only ones trying to put a figure on handling
    I am the Stig

  13. #58
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Australia.
    Posts
    12,833
    Quote Originally Posted by Slicks
    I know what your saying and thats what I would expect from some one who grew up with the Monaro. Truly the GTO was a car to be feared though. It ran faster times than the current US GTO in the 1/4 mile. People just expected more from a "GTO."
    What they are offering you now is the full package, Speed, Handling, comfort,

    If the HSV GTO can do 4.99sec 0-100, then you would expect the Pontiac to go same if not a tad faster since it shouldn't have the same weight it should be a little lighter

    But as the original, It's all ad-on's ad this ad that and it wasn't cheap, How about a Standard no options factory original GTO Vs The current 2005 one, No options full standard.
    You guys should know what can be done to these LS1's and LS2's. $2000 it's doing 12's $5000 it's doing 11's $15,000 it's in the 8's.
    Last edited by SlickHolden; 12-24-2004 at 10:33 AM.
    "Just a matter of time i suppose"

    "The elevator is broke, So why don't you test it out"

    "I'm not trapped in here with all of you, Your all trapped in here with me"

  14. #59
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    2,666
    Quote Originally Posted by SlickHolden
    What they are offering you now is the full package, Speed, Handling, comfort,

    If the HSV GTO can do 4.99sec 0-100, then you would expect the Pontiac to go same if not a tad faster since it shouldn't have the same weight it should be a little lighter

    But as the original, It's all ad-on's ad this ad that and it wasn't cheap, How about a Standard no options factory original GTO Vs The current 2005 one, No options full standard.
    You guys should know what can be done to these LS1's and LS2's. $2000 it's doing 12's $5000 it's doing 11's $15,000 it's in the 8's.
    Oh, we know what the LS1 can do...
    But f-bodies are cheaper and lighter than the GTO, thats proabably another reason they dont sell too well, cause you can get a nice used f-bod still!

  15. #60
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    The F-bodies are no more a better car though, maybe more GTO's would sell if drag racing severely outweighed circuit racing as far as popularity goes. I guess we're lucky enough over here that if you want a dedicated drag car, simply get one of the one tonners and there goes half your issues wih the car sagging its arse on launch
    I am the Stig

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Really useful performance listings...
    By Egg Nog in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 04-18-2021, 05:13 PM
  2. Pontiac GTO '2006???
    By iacoski in forum Multimedia
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 08-22-2005, 12:16 AM
  3. Pontiac GTO Sucks
    By skylark64 in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 09-27-2004, 08:26 PM
  4. GTO chase video from pontiac
    By monaroCountry in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 06-05-2004, 08:46 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •