View Poll Results: Which one would you take?

Voters
33. You may not vote on this poll
  • M5

    26 78.79%
  • STS-V

    7 21.21%
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 37 of 37

Thread: STS-V vs. M5

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Halifax, Canada
    Posts
    1,584
    The STS ofcourse !! WHY ?!! Because I own one !!


    Its a '92 model though.
    ----R.I.P----
    "Misho Ratio"
    2003 - 2004

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    2,666
    Quote Originally Posted by alwayzamd
    "Once the engine was ready and mounted in the car along with a standard six-speed automatic transmission, engineers took turns whipping on it, everywhere from GM’s test tracks in Michigan and Arizona to the aforementioned German high-speed test track where STS-V posted an eight-minute, 31-second time on the 12.94-mile Nordschleife loop. For comparison, world beaters like the Porsche 911 Turbo, BMW M5 and Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG tack up numbers in the same or only slightly better range."

    http://www.autoweek.com/article.cms?articleId=101519

    I think we need to just relax and give them some time... The car is still not ready for production...

    TJ
    Very nice, thanks for clearing that up.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Kingston, Ontario
    Posts
    559
    Quote Originally Posted by Niko_Fx
    Accidents happen due to several factors and not only the car's handling. It could have been some idiot in a hurry or simply a bad driver.

    Probally the 90 year olds they let drive around here.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Coldenflat
    Posts
    4,557
    the m5 is powerful and fast and all........but for a performance car, A) i really like what caddilac has been doing lately, this car specifically, and B) why would i want a performance car, that is partially known for having so much technology it can almost drive itself? really, a few things like traction control are ok, but as much as bmw sticks in most of their cars? JEEZ!!!!! my friends dad has a 530i, which is nice, but as a performance car id HATE it. not too mention, i HATE how bmw has so much sound dampening. its ok for luxury induced buyers, but for performance, i want to hear a mighty engine growling, not a slight hum in the background.
    "I'd hate to die twice. It's so boring" - Richard Feynman, last recorded words.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Munich, Germany
    Posts
    1,049
    Quote Originally Posted by CdocZ
    i want to hear a mighty engine growling, not a slight hum in the background.
    Well then the M5 might be the wrong car for your needs.
    Just as you said it's for luxury induced buyers who still don't want to miss the performance of a race car.
    You can only get smarter by playing a smarter opponent.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Kingston, Ontario
    Posts
    559
    Isn't the cady quiet also?

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Coldenflat
    Posts
    4,557
    Quote Originally Posted by andy.muc
    Well then the M5 might be the wrong car for your needs.
    Just as you said it's for luxury induced buyers who still don't want to miss the performance of a race car.
    exactly my point.
    no matter what, your always gonna get biased answers. depends even on how people like their performance cars
    "I'd hate to die twice. It's so boring" - Richard Feynman, last recorded words.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Really useful performance listings...
    By Egg Nog in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 04-18-2021, 05:13 PM
  2. Cadillac STS 2005-2011
    By Matt in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 01-16-2014, 12:28 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •