Links in Signatures?

[UCR]

you two never stop.

Were freinds really.

[Rockefella]

Were freinds really.

I understand.

[Matra et Alpine]

you two never stop.

hey you gotta get the laughs where you find them

[Matra et Alpine]

and as Jimbo says, friends. the past is past.

[UCR]

and as Jimbo says, friends. the past is past.

Good Good

[Coventrysucks]

so we can put pics imn them and stuff.

What do you think the avatar is there for?

If people wanted to put things bigger than that in their sigs, it would not be good for anyone, and you'd probably moan about someone having a pic

• Too big
• something about you
• something "offensive"

[baddabang]

I dont see anything wrong with simple links. if you want more subsribers then make it a premium option.

[Sweeney921]

i vote no for both. not allowing images is quite possibly the easiest decision possible, and URL's can be flat out annoying. people could easily accidentally click them all the time

[Esperante]

Sorry, checked 'Yes.'

Meant 'No.'

[carlover]

i vote no for both. not allowing images is quite possibly the easiest decision possible, and URL's can be flat out annoying. people could easily accidentally click them all the time

I don't remember ever accidentaly clicking a URL. And is it that hard to click "back"? Or the "X"?