View Poll Results: which car is lamer?

Voters
77. You may not vote on this poll
  • Chevy SSR

    51 66.23%
  • Plymouth Prowler

    26 33.77%
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 84

Thread: SSR vs prowler: which one is lamer?

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    2,682
    There both ugly, so I would park the cars both really close to each other and next to an exploding object (play timeplitters 2). Then I fire the rocket at the exploding object. Much fun.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Northern New Jersey
    Posts
    16,602
    I don't know, the SSR is fugly but the Prowler is a poseur engine-wise. Ugh, come back to me in five minutes when I make my choice. K, made it, Prowler.
    Rockefella says:
    pat's sister is hawt
    David Fiset says:
    so is mine
    David Fiset says:
    do want

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Rice, Virginia
    Posts
    1,870
    Quote Originally Posted by RS6
    And you don't when you see an SSR.
    not as much....when i see a prowler, i think silk button down short sleeve shirt, driving gloves with the fingers cut off, and cheesy sunglasses....go-tee also....with a gay grin on their face....makes me happy cause normally people like that get pissed off really easily....its not hard to make them mad
    pondering things

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    B4 UAE, now Pakistan
    Posts
    1,212
    dont hate me bcoz i kinda like the Prowler, its different from other sportscars (vettes, camaros, mustangs). at least i know its a sportscar unlike the SSR. i still cant make out what it actually is.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    south beloit IL
    Posts
    875
    Quote Originally Posted by carlover
    (play timeplitters 2).
    great game! haha

    silverhawk...but can you really classify the prowler as a sports car? it might look like one but it lacks the heart of one for sure. it doesnt even handle good and its not fast for sure. does anybody here watch american chopper? did you ever see the episode where pauly JR was hookin nitrous up to his prowler..what an idiot..they might be able to build some bikes (although im not the biggest fan of their bikes cuz most of the parts they use are just parts you can buy anywhere) but it sure shows hes an idiot when it comes to cars. i dunno i just found it funny that he drives a prowler. he probably saw that on the lot and was like man i sure can look like a douchebag drivin this...i'll take it!

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Purdue, Indiana
    Posts
    1,499
    The Prowler is definitely more lame because, as many have said before, it has a V-6. At least the SSR has a V-8.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,190
    Quote Originally Posted by aNOBLEman
    The Prowler is definitely more lame because, as many have said before, it has a V-6. At least the SSR has a V-8.
    There's nothing wrong with a V6, although the one that sits in the Prowler isn't exactly any good.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    2,682
    Quote Originally Posted by Juggs
    great game! haha
    I ordered future perfect. It comes on the 23rd (or so). I can't wait.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    2,453
    SSr is alot worse, It may have a better engine but it doesn't have better looks. Where with the prowler, it may have a wimpy engine but I kinda like it's body. You could still do some engine mods and make it pretty cool.
    My Photography: flickr.com/photos/a-m-photo/
    "The best way to predict the future is to invent it."

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Purdue, Indiana
    Posts
    1,499
    Quote Originally Posted by RS6
    There's nothing wrong with a V6, although the one that sits in the Prowler isn't exactly any good.
    I didn't mean that all V-6s are bad but the Prowler was portraid as an American roadster yet it has a wimpy V-6.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Milwaukee
    Posts
    6,544
    The SSR actually looks nice and is original-the Prowler was Chrysler trying to dumb down the Panoz Roadster for a broader market, then blatantly advertising it as 'the first hot rod ever.'
    TOYNBEE IDEA IN KUBRICK 2001 RESURRECT DEAD ON PLANET JUPITER

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    TUJUNGA, CALIFORNIA U.S of A.
    Posts
    4,208
    Quote Originally Posted by Juggs
    if you ask me both of these cars are just put out by the companies cuz they look different and they will stick out from the pack and they will sell on that feature alone. so for the most part nice things like performance, comfort, functionality ect are ignored. their both ugly (in my opinion at least..) underpowered, useless cars for people to buy who crave attention but are completely out of touch with whats cool. so heres my question to you, you have a rocket launcher but only one rocket...which car is gettin blowed up real good?
    Ill take ss-r over Plymouth Prowler any day
    Some Rulers Are Immortalized In Marble Others,
    In Carbon Fiber.{Hard Core Audi Fan}Ich Fahr Omnibus!
    """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    right now D.C. and Miami., but also London
    Posts
    94
    Quote Originally Posted by QUATTRO MAN
    Ill take ss-r over Plymouth Prowler any day

    I concur. The Prowler seriously dissapointed me, becasue I actually liked the stlying until it turned out to be seriously underpowered. Kind of like the 1994 and above V6 Mustangs (pre 2005)...
    Mustangs/ TVRs, M3s, 911 Turbos...make me smile from ear to ear...everything else..just makes me smile.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Coldenflat
    Posts
    4,557
    Quote Originally Posted by ashes2ashes
    I concur. The Prowler seriously dissapointed me, becasue I actually liked the stlying until it turned out to be seriously underpowered. Kind of like the 1994 and above V6 Mustangs (pre 2005)...
    The recent pre-'05 Mustang GT's have not been underpowered. Sure, they could have had more power, but they could move very nicely thank you very much.
    "I'd hate to die twice. It's so boring" - Richard Feynman, last recorded words.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    right now D.C. and Miami., but also London
    Posts
    94
    Quote Originally Posted by CdocZ
    The recent pre-'05 Mustang GT's have not been underpowered. Sure, they could have had more power, but they could move very nicely thank you very much.
    Ok..if you say so.. I guess it is all relative...But 190hp for a sports car as heavy as a Mustang isn't really much...
    Mustangs/ TVRs, M3s, 911 Turbos...make me smile from ear to ear...everything else..just makes me smile.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •