View Poll Results: Which do you think is best?

Voters
41. You may not vote on this poll
  • Supercharger

    13 31.71%
  • Turbocharger

    28 68.29%
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 65

Thread: Turbocharger vs Supercharger

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Rice, Virginia
    Posts
    1,870
    Quote Originally Posted by fpv_gtho
    Targa, what was the point of that last comment.....
    it was just as pointless as niko's

    dont talk to me about pointless posts, in case you havent been paying attention, they are my specialty

    po-po (blue lights in rearview)

    "my name is officer fpv_gtho, UCP state post control. License and regestration please"

    "here you go officer"

    "do you know what you did back there that made me pull you over?"

    "no sir, i was in cruise control, and well within my limits. what was your reason?"

    "erm...."

    "do you have a reason?"

    "umm...youre right. in that case, i have no reason to keep you, have a good day"

    "you to officer"

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by niko_fx
    What's wrong about my post? Just like you pointed out his repost I'm pointing out yours. You obviously didn't use the search button when making that thread my man.

    No hard feelings
    im sorry, i was a dick, girl trouble, makes me assish

    i was out of line, and for that, i am sorry
    pondering things

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    Quote Originally Posted by targa
    it was just as pointless as niko's

    dont talk to me about pointless posts, in case you havent been paying attention, they are my specialty

    po-po (blue lights in rearview)

    "my name is officer fpv_gtho, UCP state post control. License and regestration please"

    "here you go officer"

    "do you know what you did back there that made me pull you over?"

    "no sir, i was in cruise control, and well within my limits. what was your reason?"

    "erm...."

    "do you have a reason?"

    "umm...youre right. in that case, i have no reason to keep you, have a good day"

    "you to officer"
    I dont think i'll even bother with this BS as Niko's already pointed out what wouldve said anyway.
    I am the Stig

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Rice, Virginia
    Posts
    1,870
    Quote Originally Posted by fpv_gtho
    I dont think i'll even bother with this BS as Niko's already pointed out what wouldve said anyway.
    fpv_gtho, what was the point of that last comment.....
    pondering things

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,266
    Quote Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine
    Well only the s/c will give torque from low revs.
    The twin-turbos on each pair of cylidners HAS advantages over sequential as it usually involves less restriction to flow and hence "easier" power.
    Make up for hte lack of a smaller lighter turbo for the mid range revs with a s/c and bingo.
    Quite a neat setup too.
    true but a parrelel setup will accomplish teh same thing

    and since turbo boost pressures go up exponentially with flow rate its not really a problem of a turbo not being able to create enough boost but just a heat management issue, a parrellel setup will produce similar results with less weight and less drag on driveline parts (true the supercharger is probably connected through an electro magnetic clutch but the turbo's will always be "on" unless you have a bypass which adds even more weight and complexity

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    Quote Originally Posted by targa
    fpv_gtho, what was the point of that last comment.....
    Are you trying to be a moron cause youre doing pretty well
    I am the Stig

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Rice, Virginia
    Posts
    1,870
    Quote Originally Posted by fpv_gtho
    Are you trying to be a moron cause youre doing pretty well
    ooh, ouch, my psyche is reeling......wish you wouldnt use such strong language with such a moron as myself

    if you remember, thats not my comment, its yours...used on you....and you respond in anger

    tisk

    tisk

    tisk

    i tried to use humour...you havent a sense of humour

    nice way of masking a personal attack though
    pondering things

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    Ha, anger? Your mistaken on that one. Im holding back the laughter on this one.

    Masking a personal attack ey, thats rich following that stunt about the cop you pulled no more than half a dozen posts before.
    I am the Stig

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    For Tax Purposes, Cayman Islands
    Posts
    14,579
    Whoa now.

    Mod Control in Process.

    Say sorry, Both of you
    <cough> www.charginmahlazer.tumblr.com </cough>

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    Alrighty then,

    Sorry Targa
    I am the Stig

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328
    coming back to the subject, VW has just announced that they are developing a 1.4 litre FSi twin turbo with a supercharger for the low revs and an exhaust turbo for the higher revs. It will produce about 170 BHP and 200 Nm of torque. First to be fitted with the new engine will be the Golf, expected average fuel consumption 7 litres per 100 km. (As we all know it was Lancia who first combined the two turbo types in the Delta S4)
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Sydney, Down Under
    Posts
    8,833
    i'd go a supercharger, you can have instant boost using a positive-displacement blower, or have next to none at low revs and have it build up with revs, also less heat in the engine bay and less piping
    Faster, faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death...
    – Hunter Thompson

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Quote Originally Posted by KnifeEdge_2K1
    true but a parrelel setup will accomplish teh same thing
    It doesn't !!

    The smaller, lower inertia turbo STILL needs significant exhaust pressures to operate. It's a helluva lot less than a full on big turbo but equalliy is a helluva lot more than an s/c

    and since turbo boost pressures go up exponentially with flow rate its not really a problem of a turbo not being able to create enough boost but just a heat management issue, a parrellel setup will produce similar results with less weight and less drag on driveline parts (true the supercharger is probably connected through an electro magnetic clutch but the turbo's will always be "on" unless you have a bypass which adds even more weight and complexity
    Turbos cannot always be "ON" or they blow the intakes
    They also do NOT grow exponentially to inifinity. Ther are limits reached as the impellor speeds up and starts to do the uquivalent of cavitation. That's why sequential turbos are very useful and why they tend NOT to be their for BEYR high power/boost. Guys going after REALLY hight bosts acept lag.

    There are always wastegate controllers and dump valves.
    weight and complexity
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Purdue, Indiana
    Posts
    1,499
    BMW's I-6 desiel engine has a smaller (I think) turbo for low revs and a big one (again I think) that takes over as the revs climb. I think it produces 268hp and like 300something lb-ft of torque.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    517
    That's the entire idea behind sequential turbos, to lessen turbo lag. One small turbo for lower RPMs and one large turbo for higher RPMs.

    268 horses from a diesel, with only 300 ft-lbs?
    Sometimes the best view of heaven is from hell.

    Hmm...oohh....Wow!! These are delectible! Good news, Flappy! I'm not going to kill you!

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    For Tax Purposes, Cayman Islands
    Posts
    14,579
    Now imagine that in a car that weight 1400-1500 Kg,s Godlaus.

    Goes like stink.
    <cough> www.charginmahlazer.tumblr.com </cough>

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Electric Supercharger
    By PerfAdv in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-24-2004, 10:58 AM
  2. Supercharger for my Camry!
    By SPHFerrari in forum Miscellaneous
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-07-2004, 03:46 AM
  3. Turbocharger V Superchargers
    By Need4Speed in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 77
    Last Post: 05-22-2004, 01:42 PM
  4. Supercharger Info
    By firebird87 in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-11-2004, 07:40 PM
  5. supercharger
    By Hautka in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-12-2004, 07:43 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •