cant decide...luv the lambo for being a lambo; ive always loved the viper; and the m6 is the most intruiging because i know nothing about it...
m6 or viper first i think, then the lambo...
BMW E63 M6
Dodge Viper SRT-10
Lamborghini Gallardo
Member
cant decide...luv the lambo for being a lambo; ive always loved the viper; and the m6 is the most intruiging because i know nothing about it...
m6 or viper first i think, then the lambo...
wat the hell do i put as a siggy?!?!?!
Fanatic
M6's are a prime example to Asimov's I, Robot...
Vipers are drag cars...
Gallardo's are European tuned cars with a nice, big engine.
TOYNBEE IDEA IN KUBRICK 2001 RESURRECT DEAD ON PLANET JUPITER
Novice
Lambo Gallardo for me
Enthusiast
i'll take the gallardo. it is more expensive than the 2. at 640,000 dhs (manual) its a lot cheaper than the F430 coupe and cabrio, Bentley GT & DB9.
Enthusiast
Those specs i posted are not my own interpretation. I took the specs from the current issue of SportAuto.Originally Posted by my porsche
They drove all of the three cars and also took them to the wind tunnel.
They also checked the weight and tested the acceleration of the cars.
I'll post a pic of the measured data sheet tomorrow.
You can only get smarter by playing a smarter opponent.
Enthusiast
M6 for me. Simply cuz its a BMW.
2011 Honda Civic Si
ATHEIST and damn proud of it.
Enthusiast
These acceleration numbers are wrong bmw claims 4.6s for the M6 and the dodge viper srt-10 3.9s
Enthusiast
Yeesh, comes down to the Lambo and the BMW for me. I think I will go with the BMW because I think that it will probably more useable in day to day driving and all.
Enthusiast
Viper for me, I would LOVE to throw twin garrett's on there..........
Enthusiast
Top Gear claimed the 0 - 60 time for Gallardo to be 4.3
why the hell people always get different 0-60 times? i dont know which one to believe...
I choose the raging bull from germany
"Rejection is better than regret. It's better to try and know you did your part, than to spend the rest of your days wishing you had tried"
Fanatic
Dunno if you're implying its a tie between the M6 And Gallardo or you're just stupidTop Gear claimed the 0 - 60 time for Gallardo to be 4.3
why the hell people always get different 0-60 times? i dont know which one to believe...
I choose the raging bull from germany
Enthusiast
Who cares what they claim? The numbers i posted were actually tested.
The 3.9 s for your Viper are very unlikely to be true. I'm sure you want to see your Viper to kick ass...
I can only offer 0-100 km/h times.Top Gear claimed the 0 - 60 time for Gallardo to be 4.3
why the hell people always get different 0-60 times? i dont know which one to believe...
I choose the raging bull from germany
Last edited by andy.muc; 06-19-2005 at 03:50 AM.
You can only get smarter by playing a smarter opponent.
Enthusiast
Here's the scaned page of the numbers they got in the test.
I can scan the whole article if somebody's interessted.
You can only get smarter by playing a smarter opponent.
'64
Because there are a large number of variables that affect a 0-60 run.
Are the cars on the same tyres?
Are the tyres at the same temperature?
Are the tyres at the same wear levels?
Is the track surface warmer?
Is the air temperature the same? (cooler air is denser and therefore gives more power to the engine)
Is the test done at the same elevation? (again - air density)
Is the test done on the same track surface?
Is the test done with a full tank of fuel?
Is the surface competely flat, of is it fractionally uphill or downhill?
By the time you add up all the slight differences you can have quite a margin of error.
Thanks for all the fish
Member
m6...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote