MR or FR

[sniper112]

Which has the best performance?

[johnnynumfiv]

This question makes no sense. It depends on the driver usually.

[ScionDriver]

I am not even sure what MR and/or FR are.

[johnnynumfiv]

There are a lot of variable about how the car performs, the engine placement is just one, and is not a decisive one at that.

[fiat850spyder]

mid rear cuz the wait is distributed equally all is in center of car

[d-quik]

^^^just because the engine is in the middle doesn't mean the WEIGHT is distributed equally...

[SIMPLETON]

Whats up with your post count d-quik? everytime I see it says 999, even after you post. Do you just keep deleting a post for every one you make?

[KnifeEdge_2K1]

mid engined is better if everything else is equal, even if it isnt the MR will usually win out because of the better weight distribution, unless the engineers decide to put a chunk of iron in the front for no apparent reason

[h00t_h00t]

FR, but only if it has back seats.

[Esperante]

Front-Mid and Front-Rear? Don't you mean Mid-Front and Mid-Rear? Front-Rear makes no sense.

[h00t_h00t]

Engine in the front and rear-wheel drive.

[Esperante]

Ah! I thought this was about engine placement only....

[targa]

how about rear-rear?

i choose RR

[Rockefella]

Front-Mid and Front-Rear? Don't you mean Mid-Front and Mid-Rear? Front-Rear makes no sense.

Front rear makes perfect sense. Think 240sx.

[johnnynumfiv]

how about rear-rear?

i choose RR

Are there any rear-rear cars? Doesn't that mean that the engine is behind the axle?