ACURA TL (270hp v6) (6mt) FWD
MAZDASPEED6 GT (274hp turbo charged 4) (6mt) AWD
Its not just acceleration, it's also the handling of the vehicle, the braking and the refinement. Out of personal experience I believe the speed 6 excels in all these fields except refinement...Thats the one field I personally think Mazda could've done a better job on. Other then that the car turns on a dime, its braking power is 70-0 mph in 155 ft, and in the roadholding test on a 300-ft-dia skidpad scored a 0.87 which is very good for a sedan. Also the MZR engine makes 119 hp per liter (similar to that of a ferrari motor) and that is out of the factory without any modification needed. So it's not just acceleration that measures a cars performance it's much more. And just for the record the TL doesn't match any of these numbers.
Common sense doesn't seem so common anymore...
The Ferrari engine is also twice the capacity of the mazda's with 4 extra cylinders. All mazda did was use a small K04 turbo you can also find within the 2002 audi S4 and the GTI 1.8t and raised the boost to 15 psi to acheive the same numbers per liter similar to a ferrari motor. Advantages and disadvantages... Displacement or forced induction...Plus there are many cars out there that come turboed out the factory and they still cannot acheive such numbers, so I believe it is sumthing to take into consideration when discussing the facts about a vehicle...
Last edited by Speed6; 06-13-2007 at 12:43 PM.
Common sense doesn't seem so common anymore...
The number of cylinders is irrelevant? ... so whether a car has 4 or 8 cylinders does not make a difference? Ferrari engines make their power using a pretty big displacement along with a high compression ratio... Other car companies substitute that by using forced induction. And when comparing engines I think the number of cylinders IS indeed very relevant.
Common sense doesn't seem so common anymore...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)