Why F1 is boring

[forza_autodelta]

in F1 , there's just 20 cars for big tracks , here they're near 30 for little tracks , always turning and favorizing fights

[GT2addic]

30 cars in little tracks? It will be too hard to overtake and too few overtaking.

[UCR]

Right get em racing in antartica, that'll sort this shite out.

[forza_autodelta]

30 cars in little tracks? It will be too hard to overtake and too few overtaking.

why , the 30 cars are in 30/40 seconds , this is spectucular , AND I PREFER THIS SHITE TO THESE ****ING PIECE OF CARBON CALLED FORMULA ONE which are just able to cover 60 laps without other drivers at less than 100 meters of each others

[h00t_h00t]

If F1 had 40 cars it would still be 40 cars following each other around approximetly 100m apart, its the aerodynamics than do it.

[aNOBLEman]

They need to get rid of driver aids. Although there have been some nice outbraking maneuvers this year.

[Piacki_117]

I didn't find that the F1 was boring this year

[Coventrysucks]

There needs to be a decent trade off between technology and driver skill.

You can't let technology rule F1 as you'll end up with one team coming up with a good technology package that can't be beaten.

See season 2004 for what that would be like = Boring

You can't let driver skill rule F1, because although it tends to produce better racing (GP2, F3000 etc, etc) it doesn't have the same sort of cache as F1 because you don't have the ammount of investment that the big manufacturers provide.
You won't get investment from manufacturers if they can't build their own cars.

The touring car formula seems to work quite well, as seen in BTCC, ETCC, WTCC, DTM, V8 Supercars.

Different manufacturers with different cars, but limited in some aspects - i.e. they all use the same rear wing, tyres, brakes etc.