Please see the tongue in cheek tone of this thread and not kill me!
http://www.crash.net/news_view~t~Mon...~id~125018.htm
Please see the tongue in cheek tone of this thread and not kill me!
http://www.crash.net/news_view~t~Mon...~id~125018.htm
...and the debate was about...?
http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=31695
- Are YOU listed? -
MF1...great marketing
Audi humbles Porsche. A new dawn starts today.
Being nice since 2007.
I was saying the V8s would really affect the driving stlye in F1. The tongue-in-cheekness comes from the fact that I was talking about the world champ. Rather than the the backmarkers.Originally Posted by Pando
The aero is different, the weight balance is different, the tyres are different, the chassis is different, the suspension is different. It's not JUST the V8 versus V10 and if he were to drive a restricted V10 then he would have EXACLY the same complaint about the power.
So still not sure WHAT the debate was about then
HE is lamenting the loss of power !!
"A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'
I know, I know! Hence my explanation of the tounge-in-cheek-ness.
It was from a discussion we were having on here a while back.
I'm thinking if the FIA keeps taking things away from F1 the GPWA will start in 2008
I predict the GPWA would be as succesful as A1GP
"A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'
Ferrari said that their reason for signing an extension of the Concorde Agreement and not joining the GPMA is they want to be called a privateer and not a manufacturer
"We have got a different philosophy of driving and a different philosophy for the car."
Said the experienced veteran, with almost 1 year's F1 driving experiance after moving from, what, F3000?
Thanks for all the fish
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)