Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: This Explains everything

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Rancho Santa Fe, CA
    Posts
    98

    This Explains everything

    REPUBLICAN
    VS.
    DEMOCRAT
    PHILOSOPHIES




    Fundamental Beliefs
    Within the two major political parties, sharp differences exist on the specifics of various national and local issues. This occasionally causes people to wonder what holds Republicans and Democrats together--what prevents fragmentation into innumerable splinter parties.
    The answer is that the two party system relies on adherence to fundamental beliefs. As an American voter, you should examine these philosophical principles carefully.
    The main theme of Democrat philosophy is the expansion of the "general welfare" clause of the Constitution to bring within the scope of the powers of the Federal Government everything interpreted as dealing with the general welfare of the people. The New Deal, the Fair Deal, New Frontier, and Great Society are all essentially concepts of federal paternalism--direction and control of the lives of all citizens from Washington. To implement this philosophy effectively the concept of three coordinate branches of the Federal Government is rejected in favor of domination by the Executive.
    The Republican philosophy is firmly based upon acceptance of the concept of restraint of power: 1) the limited, delegated powers of the Federal Government set forth in the Constitution; 2) the balance of power among the three coordinate branches of the Federal Government; 3) the freedom of the States and their people to promote their own welfare within the spirit and letter of the Constitution, with only such assistance or regulation by the Federal Government as may be necessary in the best interests of all the people, or essential under the Constitution.

    The Two Party System--Room for a Wide Diversity of Views
    The genius, and the long life and success of the two party system in the United States, is that both great parties have provided accommodation within their ranks for a wide diversity of views. This has been possible because both parties agree upon certain objectives, e.g., the "welfare of the people," but disagree upon the means of reaching those goals. Thus, when an election brings a change of party in control of the government, there is not a revolution. The party out of power becomes the loyal opposition until it again is in the ascendancy.
    The function of the minority during this period is to: 1) point out errors and deficiencies of the party in power; 2) develop and present to the voters the plans and basic beliefs that will be brought into government if the voters select them [the opposition] to lead.

    Republican Record--Individual Initiative
    The long period of Republican leadership saw the West settled, transcontinental railroads built, a strong, sound financial system established, and our natural resources developed. It was a period of enormous complexity and growth, during which, with few brief interruptions, the Republican Party guided the Nation. Education, public health, conservation, banking, recreation, antitrust laws, and maximum development of strong, responsible government at state and local levels characterized the major thrusts of Republican efforts.
    REPUBLICAN PARTY philosophy is rooted in a belief in individual rights and responsibilities. Maximum power to determine their destiny should lie in the hands of the people and governmental power and resources should be kept close to the people, rather than monopolized from a distance by officials in Washington, D.C. Local government, local education and community life belong to the people themselves.
    DEMOCRAT administrations have pushed for more and more centralized power in Washington, with only secondary consideration for the rights of individuals and communities. This has meant increasingly tighter federal control and regimentation, often at the hands of unelected bureaucrats, and an erosion of grassroots government across the country.
    It is significant that today some Democrats are talking more and more of returning to a concept Republicans have never abandoned--that state and local governments are best suited to solving our major problems.
    For over a hundred years Republican administrations have kept faith by meeting the Nation's needs without abandoning our basic belief in the kind of government that permits the greatest flowering of individual initiative. The Republican Party demonstrated--by performance--government competence on a high scale, compassion for the interests of all in the community, the less fortunate as well as those who have prospered under our free society; and, most of all, Republicans did these things in furtherance of the belief that the primary purpose of government is to free each individual to develop the very best that is in him--all of his abilities and talents--so long as he prevents no one else from doing the same thing. This should be the goal of government everywhere.
    Domestic tranquility and unity are Republican hallmarks. No shadow of responsibility was attached to the GOP for encouraging, aligning with, or supporting the dissident forces which divided our country during the sixties. Our laws provide rules which all must respect, and they also provide restraint and penalties for those whose behavior is a threat to the freedom and rights of others.
    The preservation of our Nation and the security of our citizens depend upon the Constitution, the laws and the courts, and respect for them is the responsibility of every citizen.

    Financial Responsibility And Elimination of Over-Government
    Democrats promote an economic order dependent upon, and controlled by, Federal Government planning and regulation. They embrace as "new" the idea of a powerful central government taking our tax money to spend in our behalf, and regulating much of our lives. Far from being "new", this idea is the old European Monarchic idea which our founders rejected in the beginning. The Democrats believe that government, given enough money, can solve everything.
    Republicans believe in fiscal responsibility, and a searching scrutiny of every new spending program as to its need and cost. Democrats plunge into visionary, untested experiments, unmindful of the danger of inflation as a result of government extravagance and debt, and unwilling to reassess and adjust the programs to changing times. Once started, a Democrat program is rarely retrenched.

    Foreign Policy
    Republicans believe that only a strong America can remain a free America. Further, Republican philosophy stresses that it is absolutely essential to maintain a strong national defense posture in order that we may at all times negotiate from a position of strength, not weakness, in our continuing efforts toward world peace and friendship.
    National security and world respect are matters with which Republicans are familiar and comfortable. They have been well understood. Maintaining a strong military posture in a dangerous world is just good sense. Americans do not feel guilty about being strong. Republican administrations have sought cooperation with other countries and have refrained from meddling. These policies have produced and maintained respect and peace. by contrast, the Democrats have muddled into conflict all over the world.
    The fact remains--in comparing the success of Republican and Democrat foreign policies--that U.S. involvement in all of the world conflicts of this century has occurred under Democrat leadership--none under Republican direction.
    The best thing to do in a car short of sex is to go faster than everyone else on the road.

    life is short,
    PARTY NAKED!

    If it wasn't for physics and law enforcement, I'd be unstopable!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328
    Quote Originally Posted by Schmallz
    Republican administrations have sought cooperation with other countries and have refrained from meddling. These policies have produced and maintained respect and peace. by contrast, the Democrats have muddled into conflict all over the world.

    I could not keep my eyes dry when I read this
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Quote Originally Posted by henk4
    I could not keep my eyes dry when I read this
    I had to stop and go lie down after ....
    The Republican philosophy is firmly based upon acceptance of the concept of restraint of power
    Seemingly it only measn the restraint of everyeon ELSES power and none of theirs.

    class piece of writing .... does anyone actually belive ANY of it ??
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Disturbing the Peace
    Posts
    1,457
    well judging by his avatar it is probably the redneck that started this thread that wrote this article, probably for '"sum essay fancy piece of wrightn or sumthn'

    bit harsh, but feel like taking a leaf out of Cotterik's book at the moment...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    4,031
    Quote Originally Posted by Schmallz
    The fact remains--in comparing the success of Republican and Democrat foreign policies--that U.S. involvement in all of the world conflicts of this century has occurred under Democrat leadership--none under Republican direction.
    Pick a century - any one will do

    http://www.xs4all.nl/~stgvisie/VISIE...ntielijst.html

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    land of the Desert Extreme Challenge Rally
    Posts
    5,499
    Is there anyway you could un-biase it?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    437
    This seemed biased towards the republicans it seems to me...
    "It's better to drive a slow car fast, than a fast car slow"
    - ...?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    7,272
    Quote Originally Posted by Schmallz
    Americans do not feel guilty about being strong.
    Says it all right there doesn't it.

    Think having a small army and spending billions of $ elsewhere is a good idea?

    Well then, you're just a commie-loving, homosexual, liberal, un-American, Democrat!

    Only good, hard working patriots know that supporting a huge army is the only way to be... AMERICAN!
    Thanks for all the fish

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Somewhere in South America
    Posts
    1,281
    "This explains everything"

    And I thought I was going to find answers to philosophical questions such as is there a god, or the explenation of evolution of the universe... well, not today. Just managed to read the title and two lines before ADD took over.
    Zag when they Zig

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Gran Canaria, Spain
    Posts
    3,525
    Lol, that text was far to long and boring to be posted in the jokes thread but it had its highlights. Did you find it on RR.com?

    edit: ah, nevermind...
    http://www.accs.net/users/wolf/only111.htm
    written by National Federation Of Republican Women
    Last edited by Pando; 02-24-2006 at 08:40 AM.
    http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=31695
    - Are YOU listed? -

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Anderson Indiana
    Posts
    819
    What unadulterated crap...

    The only useful thing about this whole diatribe is that it shows how far the Bush administration has strayed from what are supposed to be "Republican" principles.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    95616
    Posts
    5,357
    where the heck did you get this? Im a democrat, people
    I'm dropping out to create a company that starts with motorcycles, then cars, and forty years later signs a legendary Brazilian driver who has a public and expensive feud with his French teammate.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Nike ONE Concept 2005
    By Vaigra in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 12-21-2005, 06:14 PM
  2. Clarkson explains some differences between the USA and Europe
    By Coventrysucks in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 107
    Last Post: 10-21-2005, 08:06 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •