Are you thinking of the mid engined V6 Clio ?Originally Posted by TVR IS KING
A totally different beast and not ever likely to return (sadly)
Are you thinking of the mid engined V6 Clio ?Originally Posted by TVR IS KING
A totally different beast and not ever likely to return (sadly)
"A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'
The grill makes the car look Renault.
"Renault" being used as an adjective.
All about the t-tops
Yes but WHY does it have to have such a fat ass?Originally Posted by Meta
ah you clearly dont' get the Renault "shake your ass" ads thenOriginally Posted by spi-ti-tout
It's a part of Renaults current "look"
"A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'
I think so.Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine
Lol.
The original..Its on GT3...something liek...Cliosport 1.6 or something...
That was kool.
This kinda isnt....
All about the t-tops
The V6 was what I had in mind when clicking on this thread aswell... *sigh* Wishful thinking i guess, and still my hot hatch of choise:
http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=31695
- Are YOU listed? -
Originally Posted by Pando
and guess what .. this new one might well do a better time than the Clio V6 on track .. 100% percent sure of it
"In UCP I TRUST".
The ads were made to justify the look which appearently has no reason and looks uglyOriginally Posted by Matra et Alpine
Whereas the V6 looks so much more aggressive and pointy this one looks like my grandmother's car. You'd buy it for style, not speed.Originally Posted by dimlight
Originally Posted by spi-ti-tout
You pay 3 times more for style .. hehe .. personally.. i love this new Clio.
"In UCP I TRUST".
"promote" not "justify".Originally Posted by spi-ti-tout
THe "ass-end" look was first developed on the Avantime.
I'm one who LIKES it in real life. ( But it fails when applied to the Espace !! )
HAve you seen one or just pics ??
eh ? The Clio RS is going to see many a "sports car" off around the tracksWhereas the V6 looks so much more aggressive and pointy this one looks like my grandmother's car. You'd buy it for style, not speed.
The styling is VERY European modern and similarities with new Pugs and Seats isn't lost on most of us. Even the new Civic is taking design clues from France !! ( 'cept seemignly the Brits were involved in the new Clio )
"A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'
However you want to put itOriginally Posted by Matra et Alpine
There were a few in the neighbourhood before the Arabs put a ban on themOriginally Posted by Meta
Get some GLASSES you old fartOriginally Posted by .....
I never said the RS didn't have speed I said the Clio looks like your proper track bastard
And my grandmother likes new designs, so there!
Last edited by spi-ti-tout; 03-01-2006 at 02:32 PM.
ooooh, usign grown up language ???Originally Posted by spi-ti-tout
WOW.I never said the RS didn't have speed I said the Clio looks like your proper track bastard
Go back adn read the quote I was commenting on and THEN you can come back and apologise
"You'd buy it for style, not speed"
I will accept by PM to save you having to admit to being an idiot in public
"A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'
sorry but I don't think one is in order for anythingOriginally Posted by meta
what is apparent to me might not be to you
notice I never actually said anything on the performance
I said the key factor you'd buy it for is styling because it looks '(insert words like chic, in, etc here)', the speed bit doesn't blend in much considering that.
Wow, you're good enough to join rr.com !!!Originally Posted by spi-ti-tout
You did NOT SAY "KEY FACTOR" you made that up.
You may have WANTED to type that but you didn't.
you DID say you woudl NOT pick the car for speed.
Again somethign you're trygin to wriggel out of.
you either typed sh!te that you didnt' mean or you're lying your ass off to avoid being too embarrassed.
Learn a lesson -- it's easier to put ones hand up and say "that's not what I meant" than it is to try to make out you said somethign else. The latter works in the playground coz most folsk won't remember the earlier conversation> It's a STUPID defence on the 'net coz everyone can go back and see what was ACTUALY TYPED
ROFLMAOTGTESS
"A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'
Must you be explained everything?Originally Posted by Meta
Yes I did not type key factor EXACTLY. "I said the key factor you'd buy it for is styling because it looks '(insert words like chic, in, etc here)', the speed bit doesn't blend in much considering that." was written to EXPLAIN to you something that appearently you can't understand.
"You'd buy it for style, not speed"
Pretty obvious what key factor is I think
not at allyou DID say you woudl NOT pick the car for speed.
quote: "You'd buy it for style, not speed"
I did not comment on the actual aspect of performance
whether it has speed or not is irrelevant as I'm commenting on the style
in other words
I would OVERLOOK / not bother with performance (for the style)
very convenient way of opening the "choice porthole" for meyou either typed sh!te that you didnt' mean or you're lying your ass off to avoid being too embarrassed.
I will settle my own things thank you
"what is apparent to me might not be to you"Learn a lesson -- it's easier to put ones hand up and say "that's not what I meant"
take into consideration you're not getting something, because the time stated above means my bed is waiting night all
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)