It came out to 18 pages A4, with mostly size 12 font and 1.5 line spacing.
Technically I'm required to use double spacing but I refuse on the principle that double spacing is just a monumental waste of paper/trees.
Super Moderator
It came out to 18 pages A4, with mostly size 12 font and 1.5 line spacing.
Technically I'm required to use double spacing but I refuse on the principle that double spacing is just a monumental waste of paper/trees.
uәʞoɹq spɹɐoqʎәʞ ʎɯ
Super Moderator
Ouch, the topic?Originally Posted by Jack_Bauer
It came out to 18 pages A4, with mostly size 12 font and 1.5 line spacing.
Technically I'm required to use double spacing but I refuse on the principle that double spacing is just a monumental waste of paper/trees.
Super Moderator
Discussing the merits of reception studies of film spectatorship, and how it answered the failings of 1970s semiotic and structuralist approaches to film theory.
Trust me, it's even more dull than it sounds!
uәʞoɹq spɹɐoqʎәʞ ʎɯ
Super Moderator
Lmao, that must have been brutal.Discussing the merits of reception studies of film spectatorship, and how it answered the failings of 1970s semiotic and structuralist approaches to film theory.
Trust me, it's even more dull than it sounds!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote