View Poll Results: which car do you like more?

Voters
48. You may not vote on this poll
  • Bugatti Veyron 16.4

    20 41.67%
  • Mclaren F1 LM

    28 58.33%
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 70

Thread: Bugatti Veyron 16.4 vs Mclaren F1 LM

  1. #46
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Settle, North Yorkshire, UK
    Posts
    11
    xj220.

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Redneckville, AL
    Posts
    623
    The Mclaren is a champion at Circuit de la Sarthe. In 95 it won outright finishing ahead of all prototypes. In 97 it won its class and was 2nd overall. There is no comparison for me.

  3. #48
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    4
    to compare f1 with veyron is not right! if we have to do it acording what? can you go with f1 400+kph with your friend or your girlfriend with ,climated and luxerious ambiance? or rainy day and full of bump in the city roads? at the comperation f1 is good only cornerin in one condition if it have all season tire on like bugatti (which is none) modifications in same conditions -volum- it can't be beaten 3liters against 16 liters exm: while you having 900hp from F1 with twin turbo you can have 4800 hp from bugatti?? the reason for 1001 hp is endurance so the owner has not have to repair engine every week!! bugatti is expensive but still very cheap next to have an f1 ..it is heavy because you can drive all around the world from vindy to very hot countries so he has to fallow the traffic line depandable way ..The shape is ugly ok! but if you look CLOSLY shape is perfect for all round because the engineer did not choose an old bugattiEB 110 shape OR karmen ghia-porche-mercedes gtr ..
    Under bonnet technology is lot more than OUTSİDE body the F1's are perfect and unreachable only in their trucs(because they made for it) they are perfect for road holdin --cornering and accelerating only in the special trucs.. Anyway neither you or me afford to pay 2 million for a car --i presume?--instead lets get ROD SAUBERY's vette for 200.000$ it is 2 times faster than F1 and bugatti if we can sacrifise few things!?
    but even than on the long run bugatti takes more point

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    4
    One more thİnk veyron İs four wheel drİve

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    4
    But my self İ prefer my 450hp evo vi for the cİty and long run thank you all

  6. #51
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    4
    to compare f1 with veyron is not right! if we have to do it acording what? can you go with f1 400+kph with your friend or your girlfriend with ,climated and luxerious ambiance? or rainy day and full of bump in the city roads? at the comperation f1 is good only cornerin in one condition if it have all season tire on like bugatti (which is none) modifications in same conditions -volum- it can't be beaten 3liters against 16 liters exm: while you having 900hp from F1 with twin turbo you can have 4800 hp from bugatti?? the reason for 1001 hp is endurance so the owner has not have to repair engine every week!! bugatti is expensive but still very cheap next to have an f1 ..it is heavy because you can drive all around the world from vindy to very hot countries so he has to fallow the traffic line depandable way ..The shape is ugly ok! but if you look CLOSLY shape is perfect for all round because the engineer did not choose an old bugattiEB 110 shape OR karmen ghia-porche-mercedes gtr ..
    Under bonnet technology is lot more than OUTSİDE body the F1's are perfect and unreachable only in their trucs(because they made for it) they are perfect for road holdin --cornering and accelerating only in the special trucs.. Anyway neither you or me afford to pay 2 million for a car --i presume?--instead lets get ROD SAUBERY's vette for 200.000$ it is 2 times faster than F1 and bugatti if we can sacrifise few things!?
    but even than on the long run bugatti takes more point

  7. #52
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Devon, England
    Posts
    223
    No challenge, the McLaren F1 every time. The Veyron is unbeatable in a straight line, but round a racetrack a 60,000 Nissan GTR could beat it.

    The McLaren has agility.

  8. #53
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    102
    Quote Originally Posted by TheScrutineer View Post
    but round a racetrack a 60,000 Nissan GTR could beat it.
    funny

  9. #54
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Kyushu
    Posts
    6,039
    Quote Originally Posted by TheScrutineer View Post
    The Veyron is unbeatable in a straight line, but round a racetrack a 60,000 Nissan GTR could beat it.
    that's true, with the exception that you are completely wrong.
    Honor. Courage. Commitment. Etcetera.

  10. #55
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Modena
    Posts
    9,826
    Just to quote an over abused source, on the Top Gear track the Veyron was faster than the GT-R by a good 1.4 secs margin.
    Just because the GT-R is ridiculously fast around the 'Ring it doesn't mean it's that fast everywhere else.
    I actually suspect the Nissan folks focused a bit too much on the absolute performance and 'Ring time than in other important side of a car.
    KFL Racing Enterprises - Kicking your ass since 2008

    *cough* http://theitalianjunkyard.blogspot.com/ *cough*

  11. #56
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,337
    No matter how fast the Datsun goes, it's still a Datsun. And no matter how capable the Volkswagen is, it still is a Volkswagen.
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  12. #57
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    brisbane - sub-tropical land of mangoes
    Posts
    16,254
    Quote Originally Posted by cmcpokey View Post
    that's true, with the exception that you are completely wrong.
    LOL.
    i suppose it depends what track it is... and what the veyron races in a straight line hahahaha
    Andreas Preuninger, Manager of Porsche High Performance Cars: "Grandmas can use paddles. They aren't challenging."

  13. #58
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    └A & Connecticlump
    Posts
    5,245
    Quote Originally Posted by BİGBROTHER View Post
    to compare f1 with veyron is not right! if we have to do it acording what? can you go with f1 400+kph with your friend or your girlfriend with ,climated and luxerious ambiance? or rainy day and full of bump in the city roads? at the comperation f1 is good only cornerin in one condition if it have all season tire on like bugatti (which is none) modifications in same conditions -volum- it can't be beaten 3liters against 16 liters exm: while you having 900hp from F1 with twin turbo you can have 4800 hp from bugatti?? the reason for 1001 hp is endurance so the owner has not have to repair engine every week!! bugatti is expensive but still very cheap next to have an f1 ..it is heavy because you can drive all around the world from vindy to very hot countries so he has to fallow the traffic line depandable way ..The shape is ugly ok! but if you look CLOSLY shape is perfect for all round because the engineer did not choose an old bugattiEB 110 shape OR karmen ghia-porche-mercedes gtr ..
    Under bonnet technology is lot more than OUTSİDE body the F1's are perfect and unreachable only in their trucs(because they made for it) they are perfect for road holdin --cornering and accelerating only in the special trucs.. Anyway neither you or me afford to pay 2 million for a car --i presume?--instead lets get ROD SAUBERY's vette for 200.000$ it is 2 times faster than F1 and bugatti if we can sacrifise few things!?
    but even than on the long run bugatti takes more point
    The McLaren has one seat more than the Veyron.
    "Kimi, can you improve on your [race] finish?"
    "No. My Finnish is fine; I am from Finland. Do you have any water?"

  14. #59
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Wishing I was in Moscow, Idaho
    Posts
    2,585
    Quote Originally Posted by f6fhellcat13 View Post
    The McLaren has one seat more than the Veyron.
    Which means it is possible to take twins on a date. Never underestimate that little bit of usefullness.
    Big cities suck

    "Not putting miles on your Ferrari is like not having sex with your girlfriend so she'll be more desirable to her next boyfriend." -Napolis

  15. #60
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,486
    Quote Originally Posted by wwgkd View Post
    Which means it is possible to take twins on a date. Never underestimate that little bit of usefullness.
    I can get quads in my four-banger.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Bugatti Veyron 16.4 vs SSC Ultimate Aero
    By Gtek-i in forum Car comparison
    Replies: 357
    Last Post: 10-30-2010, 06:16 PM
  2. Bugatti Veyron W16 Engine
    By r1ckst4 in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 05-22-2008, 02:48 PM
  3. Bugatti Veyron vs a Formula 1 car
    By imran_hodekar in forum Car comparison
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 04-11-2006, 09:50 AM
  4. Bugatti Sends Veyron 16.4 Into Production
    By WyleECoyote in forum Multimedia
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 10-27-2004, 07:31 PM
  5. Bugatti Veyron 16.4 OR Ferrari F50 GT
    By Olly89 in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 07-23-2004, 08:37 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •