Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Performance Graphs - horsepower/torque

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,552

    Performance Graphs - horsepower/torque

    http://www.rototest.com

    This site has a large collection of graphs and details about engine output and real wheel hp, as measured by their equiptment. Great resource for researching engines.

    Click "performance graphs" >> "graphs"
    "Racing improves the breed" ~Sochiro Honda

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,734
    wow pretty cool. cheers for sharing it!
    How can men use sex to get what they want?
    Sex is what they want. - Frasier

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,200
    I found that site alittle while ago. They use some of the most accurate dynos in the world and they show outputs at the crank and at the wheels. Helped me alot researching motors.
    Power, whether measured as HP, PS, or KW is what accelerates cars and gets it up to top speed. Power also determines how far you take a wall when you hit it
    Engine torque is an illusion.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    53
    Great web-site but it only has the modern models.

    Quote Originally Posted by hightower99
    I found that site alittle while ago. They use some of the most accurate dynos in the world and they show outputs at the crank and at the wheels. Helped me alot researching motors.
    Read your signature and was wondering why are porting and polishing bad in your opinion?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,200
    Well that question will probably cause a big arguement but the truth is that polishing is a flawed concept that in the real world leads to losses due to increased friction (however don't mix polishing up with smoothing which is normally benificial) Porting is normally not going to work for the better on it's own because it too is a misunderstood concept. To tune 4 stroke engines you must realise that there are 8 phases that need to be taken into account. The classical intake phase you read about in text books actually is made up of 3 different phases in real life. Intake overlap, Intake flow, and Intake charging. Porting noramlly increases the volume of the intake ports which allows for higher flow rates but lowers the velocity seen by the engine. The velocity is crucial in the last and most important phase of intake namely Intake charging (the point where the piston is passing BDC and for a short time travels upwards before the intake valve closes). To increase the amount of air closed into the cylinder is how you make more power, and therefore you have to make sure that in the intake charging phase the most air possible is being crammed into the cylinder. To increase the velocity you can remove the "dead space" that is in most intake ports this will increase velocity without lowering flow.

    The whole subject was talked about in another thread so try a search. This is just a short snippet.
    Power, whether measured as HP, PS, or KW is what accelerates cars and gets it up to top speed. Power also determines how far you take a wall when you hit it
    Engine torque is an illusion.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Quote Originally Posted by hightower99
    The whole subject was talked about in another thread so try a search. This is just a short snippet.
    Shame you decided to put only the one ( largely erroneous ) point of view, ht.

    Polishing and porting DOES help, but it's NOT simple ( which is what ht was rightly saying can do little ).

    Polishing and porting is NOT about making it BIGGER but makgin it BETTER

    Recommend you search and read the various threads we've had on porting and polishing and glean teh benefits, techniques and warnings from those.
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    3,560
    hightower99, we are still waiting to see your dyno graphs that you have been promising for sevearl months now on this.
    Chief of Secret Police and CFO - Brotherhood of Jelly
    No Mr. Craig, I expect you to die! On the inside. Of heartbreak. You emo bitch

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Quote Originally Posted by Cyco
    hightower99, we are still waiting to see your dyno graphs that you have been promising for sevearl months now on this.
    But PLEASE do it in the threads where it was asked
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    TRNC/UAE
    Posts
    43
    Please be aware,

    This is a hub dyno and so doesn't measure rear wheel hp.
    The highest transmission loss is in the wheels/tyres. Hence the low loss with the Audi RS4 of only 20% from measured hub power to flywheel for 4wd, and only approx 8% for the V10 M5.

    quote:-
    ........"ROTOTEST Chassis dyno
    The test has been conducted using a ROTOTEST Chassis Dynamometer. The dynamometer is in reality a supreme engine dynamometer fitted to each drive wheel. The Rototest dyno is of hub-type design (in contrast to roller-type, or rolling road) and is being used by many of the auto manufacturers around the world in their research and development and quality assurance."

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,266
    sid's right on the money there, sorta

    the wheel/tyres dont really rob horsepower in the same way as the transmission because tranny losses are due to friction, losses from the wheels is due to inertia, it takes torque to spin the heavy wheel and tyre and this "robs" horsepower, because the torque used to spin up the wheel and tyre wont be measured by a roller type dyno, the losses due to inertia arre proportional to the rate of acceleration, so at high speeds where acceleration is slow the loss due to the tyre and wheel weight is minimal

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    IA
    Posts
    467
    Quote Originally Posted by KnifeEdge_2K1
    sid's right on the money there, sorta

    the wheel/tyres dont really rob horsepower in the same way as the transmission because tranny losses are due to friction, losses from the wheels is due to inertia, it takes torque to spin the heavy wheel and tyre and this "robs" horsepower, because the torque used to spin up the wheel and tyre wont be measured by a roller type dyno, the losses due to inertia arre proportional to the rate of acceleration, so at high speeds where acceleration is slow the loss due to the tyre and wheel weight is minimal
    Damping in the tire sidewall could be consider a frictional loss.

    As well, isn’t power independent of acceleration? So any inertial affects shouldn’t change the steady state power generated by the engine.
    "In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not."

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Ford Shelby GT500 2006-
    By McLareN in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 74
    Last Post: 03-15-2010, 04:38 PM
  2. `Toyota to indroduce "TRD" performance division`
    By adrenaline in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 08-26-2006, 06:58 AM
  3. New Prodrive Performance Packs for Subaru
    By Vaigra in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-07-2006, 02:52 PM
  4. Ford Mustang Racing Prototype 2004
    By Matt in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-29-2004, 04:31 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •