View Poll Results: which car would you rather have?

Voters
34. You may not vote on this poll
  • 2002 Toyota MR-S

    3 8.82%
  • 2006 Honda S2000

    27 79.41%
  • 2006 Mazda MX-5 Miata

    4 11.76%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27

Thread: Toyota MR-S vs Honda S2000 vs Mazda MX-5 Miata

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    White Rock BC, Canada
    Posts
    2,089

    Toyota MR-S vs Honda S2000 vs Mazda MX-5 Miata

    Toyota MR-S: 138hp, MR drivetrain, 126lb-ft torque, 1.8 liter, 0-60mph in 7.2 seconds, 210km/h top speed, 970kg CURB WEIGHT. Honda S2000: 237hp, FR drivetrain, 162lb-ft torque, 2.0 liter, 0-60mph in 5.8 seconds, 1296kg weight. Mazda MX-5 Miata: 170hp, FR drivetrain, 140lb-ft torque, 2.0 liter, 0-60mph in 7.1 seconds, 209km/h top speed, 1095kg CURB WEIGHT.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Reality
    Posts
    3,151
    S2K! Its one of those cars that doesn't often look very exciting in pictures, but in reality its astonishing. I went to the dealership the other day, and the car is much lower and much wider than I ever imagined. Its hard to get a sense of proportions when looking at pictures sometimes, not for all cars of course, but this one must be seen in person (or car). The new MX-5 is a cool car too, a huge step up from the last generation, but I'm still not impressed by it. I have to go with Honda.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    White Rock BC, Canada
    Posts
    2,089
    I voted for the MR-S because it's MR, is extremely light, and is super rare in Canada. But the S2000 looks better.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    866
    The S2000 is considerrrrably more expensive than the other two, so it's a not really a fair comparison. S2000 for performance and looks. MX-5 definitely comes second though.
    - IS250fied -

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,552
    Quote Originally Posted by fa22_raptor
    The S2000 is considerrrrably more expensive than the other two, so it's a not really a fair comparison. S2000 for performance and looks. MX-5 definitely comes second though.
    Yes.
    .
    "Racing improves the breed" ~Sochiro Honda

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    isnt it all about west virginia?
    Posts
    1,927
    Quote Originally Posted by fa22_raptor
    The S2000 is considerrrrably more expensive than the other two, so it's a not really a fair comparison. S2000 for performance and looks. MX-5 definitely comes second though.
    plus, the MR-2 has stopped production
    badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger badger

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    White Rock BC, Canada
    Posts
    2,089
    it's a shame no ones goin for the MR-S...really...it appeals to me...and i've never seen one before cause its so rare ´___`

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    True North
    Posts
    7,682
    S2000 because its got more power and better looks.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,831
    There's a reason MR-2 spiders are so rare, they're ugly. The MX-5 is very nice, but both are outclassed by the S2000 by a longshot.
    i was waiting on a moment, but the moment never came. all the billion other moments, were just slipping all away. i must have been tripping, we're just slipping all away. just ego tripping.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    here
    Posts
    84
    Bullshit they are ugly. Also do not forget about price, S2k are much more expensive than MR2.
    Former rt13.
    To see more, visit [url]http://ps-garage.com/gallery/rt13[/url]
    Thank you.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Detroit
    Posts
    2,176
    Quote Originally Posted by RT15
    Bullshit they are ugly. Also do not forget about price, S2k are much more expensive than MR2.
    Yeah, but that is because you get more with the S2000. You get a longer wheelbase, bigger trunk, and more power.
    I have found a new love in the form of a tristar.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Northern New Jersey
    Posts
    16,602
    Quote Originally Posted by Prius
    Yeah, but that is because you get more with the S2000. You get a longer wheelbase, bigger trunk, and more power.
    People who buy an S2000 are not looking for cargo room. I'll take the Miata 9 times out of 10 in daily situations : Cornering prowess > Power.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    8,068
    S2000's own, put simply

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    East Coast of the United States
    Posts
    12,007
    I'd take the S2000 also.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,489
    I like the Mazda, it's probably lighter than the S2000 and I prefer the MX-5 to the Toyota. So the MX-5 then.
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Really useful performance listings...
    By Egg Nog in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 04-18-2021, 05:13 PM
  2. GT4 whole car list!!!!
    By Mustang in forum Gaming
    Replies: 247
    Last Post: 07-07-2010, 08:06 AM
  3. Testing Forza: Video
    By Niko_Fx in forum Gaming
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 03-18-2005, 10:11 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •