Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 20 of 20

Thread: F1 Valve and Cam Question

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    5,456
    well this is an old thread and new info are hard to come by in terms of specifics....
    University of Toronto Formula SAE Alumni 2003-2007
    Formula Student Championship 2003, 2005, 2006
    www.fsae.utoronto.ca

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    75
    As far as I can asscertain from recent journals on the sunject, F1 engines have always had camshafts, an entirely camless engine cannot operate fast enough and is nowhere near reliable enough for the speeds required in F1.

    The pnuematic spring system works as a conventional spring would to shut the valve as the camshaft moves around, but does so without the 'float' common with conventional springs at high rpm. The pnuematic system effectively slams the valves open very aggressively, far more so than any metal spring could ever hope to achieve.

    Totally camless engines are coming, but I think they are a long way off in terms of being commercially viable. To limiting restrictions at present regarding the favoured soleniod operation are the size and power requirements. Typically a solenoid will be optimised for one thing, travel, speed or force. An engine requires all three of these to be maximised, which is a tall order for anything that is to fit in the space of a conventional camshaft system, especially with the current 12-14v limitation on power.

    Fully hydraulic/pnuematic systems I do not know so much about, but I gather they also carry their own limitations, particularly with regards to force and speed.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Gold Coast, Australia
    Posts
    581
    Basically....Springs have rebound at higher duty cycles, pneumatic equivalents don't (well it is negligible) so more accurate valve operation is possible at very high RPMs.
    Kozy...I wouldn't say the valve slams open, rather that it opens and closes as designed, by the camshaft grind, at higher RPMs.
    Last edited by revetec; 02-27-2008 at 03:10 PM.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Quote Originally Posted by revetec View Post
    Kozy...I wouldn't say the valve slams open, rather that it opens and closes as designed, by the camshaft grind.
    yeah the open is always driven by the cam profile. THe close however is determined by the strength of the spring and at high revs can leave the profile and will bounce. F1 use penumatics to close and cam to open.
    Ducati love Desmodronic whcih pushes in both directions -- and hence it's drawback too
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Gold Coast, Australia
    Posts
    581
    Ah yes...but until valve bounce occurs (usually 500rpm before it is audible) the camshaft totally determines closing rates.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •