I do have something valid to say. You are ignorant.Originally Posted by h22a
I do have something valid to say. You are ignorant.Originally Posted by h22a
what happened to no personal calls?Originally Posted by johnnynumfiv
Chief your a yank(Ignorance is you middle name)
keep pulling your lizard dick over the LS7, i'll be very content with the V10.
hmm reliable
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_RcK...elated&search=
Last edited by h22a; 12-05-2006 at 11:02 PM.
RUF CTR Yellowbird is what dreams are made of
Stop making the rest of Aussies look bad. It's a BMW engine, and the LSX is OHV. Pushrod engines = OHV engines.Originally Posted by monaroCountry
Faster, faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death...
– Hunter Thompson
Chief why do you bother even postingOriginally Posted by Ferrer
http://www.bmwworld.com/models/m5_e60.htm
RUF CTR Yellowbird is what dreams are made of
Did you even read that article? It states that BMW have learned from some of the processes used in its motorsports divisions to help develop the M5's engine (ie bogstandard press-release waffle). At no point does it suggest that it is a detuned version of the F1 V10 engine, or that it shares any components whatsoever with it. It bears no relation to the old F1 engine aside from the engine's configuration.Originally Posted by h22a
And if you carry on insulting other forum members I can assure you it will be you who won't be bothering posting anymore. Either debate civilly on the forums or not at all.
uәʞoɹq spɹɐoqʎәʞ ʎɯ
That article was full of the typical press release garbage... "Race inspired" does not equal "We took it straight off our F1 motor and put it in your street car."
[O o)O=\x/=O(o O]
The things we do for girls who won't sleep with us.
Patrick says:
dads is too long so it wont fit
so i took hers out
and put mine in
hey cheif i never instigated any insult.
Did you read the article?
The engine shares more than just its number of cylinders with the Formula 1 engine that powers the BMW WilliamsF1 team. Technology forged in the heat of motorsport has enhanced the processes and components used in this new powerhouse engine.
It might not use the same components but the technology has been carried over
RUF CTR Yellowbird is what dreams are made of
Well the LS7 has actual parts from the C5R motor. Advantage? LS7.
[O o)O=\x/=O(o O]
The things we do for girls who won't sleep with us.
Patrick says:
dads is too long so it wont fit
so i took hers out
and put mine in
Quoted from the article.Inspired by Formula One!
Translating Formula 1 technology directly into a road car maybe BMW M's most impressive feat to date.
BMW M engineers were given the task of focusing "first and foremost on engine power". They were able to tap into such aspects of F1 engine technology as how the oil supply has to be regulated at high cornering forces.
Click for a larger image
The BMW Concept M5 translates Formula 1 technology into a road car and is powered by a V10 engine — a first for BMW. The Concept M5 delivers around 373kW of power and 500Nm of torque (490bhp and 370lb/ft of torque), and is capable of completing the zero to 100km/h sprint in well under five seconds, according to the manufacturer.
Featuring many of the styling and technological advancements offered by new 5-Series models, the new M5's engine is said to be derived from BMW's race-winning Formula 1 efforts - it is commonly accepted that BMW delivers the most powerful F1 engine on the grid. While not capable of the F1 engine's stratospheric 19,000 rpm, the road car's Valvetronic engine will be able to achieve a stunning 9,000 rpm.
Another feature of the new M5 borrowing F1 technology is the new seven-speed Sequential Manual Gearbox change. The Concept M5 also uses a modified version of BMW’s Dynamic Stability Control (DSC), a purpose-designed braking system, and a new development of the company’s Servotronic steering.
Formula 1 technology is also carried over to the gearbox. The Concept M5 is equipped with a seven-speed Sequential Manual Gearbox with racing-type paddle shifters on its steering wheel — another first for BMW.
VTEC was first used by Honda in racing and F1, then it trickled into their production models. For a long time VTEC kicked ass as other manufacturers struggled to master their own versions.
No one would give you an engine that was designed to last 2 race weekends. It's just some of what they've learned.
Even Lexus is going to cash in on the F1-V10 engines Toyota raced. Their new Supercar is said to be V10 powered which is F1-derived...
"Racing improves the breed" ~Sochiro Honda
Like I said, it's just typical manufacturer sales spiel. They claim that the engine has links with the F1 engines, yet provide no evidence of this whatsoever. It's exactly the same with the gearbox. They made a big song and dance about how the "revolutionary 7-speed transmission" was derived from their F1 exploits, but again the reality is the only thing it has in common is the number of ratios and flappy paddles. It's just marketing guff, don't get sucked in by it.Originally Posted by h22a
uәʞoɹq spɹɐoqʎәʞ ʎɯ
Not anymore, they're said to be going down the V8+hybrid route.Originally Posted by PerfAdv
Faster, faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death...
– Hunter Thompson
I know it seems like quite a sweeping statement, but how much more can we reliably squeeze out of an engine? And don't forget it's at the expense of torque... the Z06 has almost equal amounts of torque and bhp, whereas the M5's engine has a serious deficit in the torque department, making it much harder work on the road- a lot of gearchange action. Then again, a more involved driver might like that...Originally Posted by 2ndclasscitizen
Probably one of the more valid statements in this thread, apart from the last part. If Chevy really hadn't bothered to tickle the LS7, then they'd have got the same power rating as a Jeep Wrangler. But they didn't- they got over 500bhp, which isn't bad, taking into consideration that a lot of Yankee beasts don't make over 50bhp/l (yes, I know the bhp/l argument is pointless, but it's true...)I can't really choose between these 2 engines. I mean, I love V8s, but I really like the thinking behind the V10. To me, it seems as though at BMW they sat down and went "We are going to buld the best damn engine we can" and then used all their engineering knoweledge and skill to do that. Whereas to me the LS7 says that GM needed a more powerful engine for the Z06 and someone just went "Just make it bigger, that'll do" The C5 Z06 didn't need a bigger engine, GM worked at the LS1, made it better and came out with the LS6.
Ops my bad OHV and OHC...................Stop making the rest of Aussies look bad. It's a BMW engine, and the LSX is OHV. Pushrod engines = OHV engines.
Originally Posted by -What-The only thing you're doing is claiming that you're putting the fire out with water when you're really tipping gasoline on it. Don't call people bitches and say they f*cking suck and arguments won't start.Originally Posted by What
Lead Driver For The UCP.com Draggin' & Driftin' Racing Team.
If only there was one.
if features and technology is what you like to brag about down the pub then the M5 V10 is your bag but i have to respect the significant gain in efficiency of these pushrod V8s over the last decade.
Originally Posted by autozine.org
autozine.org
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)