Originally Posted by
PoRsChEnUt
Using the basic thinkwise of every (non homosexual) man, and his behaviour, its easy to help you with your choice.
- Men always exaggerate, if they say they have 200hp, they have almost 80hp, if they say they can lift 150kg, they can hardly benchpress 60kg and so on and on. Using this first simple man rule, you problably have 1,8485 girl adoring you. (4 girls / average man exaggeration number, or simply known as M.E.N)
- Men are Lazy, face it, you are not going to drive 100km or to paris for a girl. Depending on the girl ofcourse, but using the M.E.N. Index the girl 100km from you isnt very goodlooking, but basicly looking. Looking means she is not interested in you and that she is still searching for mister right. You dont want a girl who actually doesnt want you, and waits for something better to come along, so ditch the basic income (= rich after M.E.N.) girl, who isnt actually interested. The girl from paris, you said yourself, she lives to far away. So that leaves us with -0.1515 girls.
- Men cant count that well, so going on with -0.1515 girl, we will look at the other "candidate" The girl playing not Hard To Get. When a girl plays not hard to get, there is something wrong with her. It is unfeminine behaviour, so there must be a third leg or a missing clitoris she is not telling you about. My advice, stay away, you dont want any of that. It might be a cool gimmick in the beginning, but it always leads to putting it away in your closet (remember your transformer collection?) And the "acceptable" comment about her looks, makes me worry about her looks after M.E.N. corrections
that already brings us at -1.00 girl. And we got the B girl left, she sounds interested, (after M.E.N.) normal looking, normal character (girls like being teased and they tease back when interested) I would go for this one, but, we still have our -1.00 girl left, which after adding girl B, you still come out on 0 girls interested in you.
so basicly, you are either not speaking the truth, or you are a female in which case my whole logic needs to be revised
Reply With Quote
