Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 33

Thread: Beck Engineering LM800

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Sydney, Down Under
    Posts
    8,833
    I don't know why these companies with sequential gearboxes in their cars can't offer them without the computer controlled hydraulic stuff, just with a clutch pedal and shifter. It can't be that hard to drive a Manual sequential box around can it?
    Faster, faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death...
    – Hunter Thompson

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    531
    Quote Originally Posted by 2ndclasscitizen
    I don't know why these companies with sequential gearboxes in their cars can't offer them without the computer controlled hydraulic stuff, just with a clutch pedal and shifter. It can't be that hard to drive a Manual sequential box around can it?
    True sequential gearboxes are pretty raw. Koenigsegg abandoned theirs because they couldn't make it streetable. The kicker is that many of these so-called sequentail systems are nothing more than computerised 3 shaft manuals. Ferrari is a good example; the only difference between their manual and sequentail gearboxes is who has control, you or the car. It's just a fad; a marketing ploy designed to lure those who want the cache of driving something fast, but are too lazy, or can't be bothered to actually drive!

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Scotland, UK
    Posts
    1,163
    This lines of this car looks very similar to the Orca SC7. It looks like it's just re-marketed.

    http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame...hp&carnum=2336

    Anyway, it looks really raw and un-refined, which is good for some people.

    EDIT: It IS the same car, as the Orca was launched by Rene Beck (sounds familiar?), according to Wooter's comments on the UCP page of the Orca. If he spent some more money to make the car look like a decent super-car, he might have some chance against the other supercars (Pagani, Koenigsegg, Enzo etc). But now, he just targets a really small market: The supercar enthusiasts that only care about the driving experience and not the looks.
    Last edited by lightweight; 01-18-2007 at 06:00 AM.
    Minimising losses can maximise net gains

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,734
    Quote Originally Posted by bruxell

    Yay Lotec fans!
    or fan anyway
    How can men use sex to get what they want?
    Sex is what they want. - Frasier

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Kyushu
    Posts
    6,039
    anybody else see a BMW on the back end....?

    either way, im not really digging it.
    Honor. Courage. Commitment. Etcetera.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    2,038
    Quote Originally Posted by cmcpokey
    anybody else see a BMW on the back end....?

    either way, im not really digging it.
    If you mean that the rear looks like the front of a poorly made origami Bimmer, then yes.
    Go n-ithe an cat thu, is go n-ithe an diabhal an cat

    When you go Home, Tell them for us and say 'For your tommorrow, We Gave Our Today.'

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Kyushu
    Posts
    6,039
    thats exactly what i meant
    Honor. Courage. Commitment. Etcetera.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    100
    What an ugly looking thing: design looks like a Lemans car from the nineties (porsche 962 and the likes)... Since looks counts very much in the sales or not of such a car, I believe this is another deadborn project...

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    GB
    Posts
    1,693
    Just for clarity, when a car weight is usually stated in magazines and webpages, isn't that normally with only the bare minimum liquids and no driver?

    Cos bearing in mind this thing has a 120 litre fuel tank, that's around 120kg + the 80kg for the driver, deduct that from the 900kg stated and we're near 700kg. That strikes me as very light for a car with 650 ponies to toy with. 900nm is about 660ft lb, which sounds like a lot, too. Anybody know the origin of the engine?

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,489
    Quote Originally Posted by bruxell
    Ferrari, Lamborghini, Porsche, Pagani, Koenigsegg, TVR, Lotus, Corvette…
    You'd struggle to fine a modern Ferrari with a gear stick, Lamborghini is incresingly going flappy paddle too and Porsche is probably going to introduce PDK for the next generation of sportscars... In my opinion the manual is more or less dead when it comes to sportscars, it might last a little longer, but unfortunately the future are clutchless transmissions.
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,489
    Quote Originally Posted by VtecMini
    Anybody know the origin of the engine?
    Twin Turbo Audi V8.
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    East Coast of the United States
    Posts
    12,007
    Quote Originally Posted by bruxell
    Ferrari, Lamborghini, Porsche, Pagani, Koenigsegg, TVR, Lotus, Corvette…
    I'd love to have an FXX or even an Enzo with a manual...

    Yes, the others offer manuals, but they've been slanting towards SMG's lately.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Warsaw
    Posts
    4,448
    Quote Originally Posted by NSXType-R
    I'd love to have an FXX or even an Enzo with a manual...

    Yes, the others offer manuals, but they've been slanting towards SMG's lately.
    that would destroy it same as it would destroy a muscle car to put the f1 paddles innit

    it'd be like putting a manual gearbox to the f1 car imagine driving that... no sense at all
    12 cylinders or walk!

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,489
    Quote Originally Posted by dydzi
    that would destroy it same as it would destroy a muscle car to put the f1 paddles innit

    it'd be like putting a manual gearbox to the f1 car imagine driving that... no sense at all
    Why not? If you want to drive, why limit yourself to a flappy paddle gearbox?

    Newer isn't always better.
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    East Coast of the United States
    Posts
    12,007
    Quote Originally Posted by dydzi
    that would destroy it same as it would destroy a muscle car to put the f1 paddles innit

    it'd be like putting a manual gearbox to the f1 car imagine driving that... no sense at all
    Transmissions can be built to withstand that torque or power. Trucks have way more torque than an exotic like that and still manuals exist. They're just too lazy to develop one. How hard could it be?

    The Pagani Zonda has a manual and that has loads of power and torque.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Ford US announces massive plan regarding Ford Australia
    By fpv_gtho in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 112
    Last Post: 05-18-2006, 07:46 PM
  2. GDT Speedster
    By Vaigra in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-10-2006, 03:53 AM
  3. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 11-18-2004, 11:58 AM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-21-2004, 08:27 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •