It is a Maserati Quattroporte...and traction control will avoid spoiling rubber in the way you apparently like it. It does the EVO track in Bedfordshire in 1 minute 28.3 seconds. For comparison, a Bentley Continental GT took 4 seconds more, a Chrysler 300C Hemi managed 1.34.6.....
"I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams
"I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams
This may surprise you, but many people aren't concerned that the Maserati was 4-6 seconds faster on a track than a Bentley or a 300C. At $100,000+, it cost a lot of money to get that extra 4-6 second faster speed!
And a Maserati is not a muscle car by American definitions because a muscle car does not have an extremely high price (muscle cars were/are affordable).
'76 Cadillac Fleetwood Seventy-Five Limousine, '95 Lincoln Town Car.
'76 Cadillac Fleetwood Seventy-Five Limousine, '95 Lincoln Town Car.
"I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams
Best:
Black
White
Blue or Red depending on car.
Worst:
Silver
Green
Lighter shades of blue.
At $100,000, it doesn't really matter how well it accelerates or handles (for the majority of people who can't afford to buy one, that is). And if 4-6 seconds faster is "handling much better," what would 2 second faster be? Much, much better?
And the one you posted- I think it would look better in black!
'76 Cadillac Fleetwood Seventy-Five Limousine, '95 Lincoln Town Car.
'76 Cadillac Fleetwood Seventy-Five Limousine, '95 Lincoln Town Car.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)