lol, why do you ask? Do you expect people to vote for it?Originally Posted by my porsche
Member
lol, why do you ask? Do you expect people to vote for it?
My other signature has a V12
Fanatic
Thanks for posting that, Colin- really sheds light, doesn't it?
I'm still sticking with the last option.
Fanatic
MP thats way more drastic an editing technique than any of us would ever be prepared to apply.
Furniture
It's not that drastic... Image>adjustments>selective color.
Not drakkie apparently. since he had one orange car and entered a puke colored one.
No i know it wouldn't get votes i was just showing how with my shitty PS skills i can change a red car to a purple one pretty simply.
Last edited by my porsche; 05-16-2007 at 04:09 PM.
He came dancing across the water
With his galleons and guns
Looking for the new world
In that palace in the sun
On the shore lay Montezuma
With his cocoa leaves and pearls
Fanatic
I kinda liked the purple effort, particularly the 'burst effect around the edges...
Fanatic
I meant its drastic compared to what I'm saying the rules in the comp should allow.
Furniture
oh no i didn't mean it as in 'hey should i enter this one' i just meant to point out how easy it is to edit and no one be the wiser.
here's the original, btw.
Last edited by my porsche; 05-16-2007 at 07:31 PM.
He came dancing across the water
With his galleons and guns
Looking for the new world
In that palace in the sun
On the shore lay Montezuma
With his cocoa leaves and pearls
Fanatic
It would be detrimental to DSLR users who shoot using RAW mode, as there is no processing applied to the files, hence:
That's only valid if you shoot in JPEG mode.
Furniture
Which I do, I don't feel like messing with RAW nor spending the $100 on a good converter when i could put the $100 towards my new dvd player for my truck.
He came dancing across the water
With his galleons and guns
Looking for the new world
In that palace in the sun
On the shore lay Montezuma
With his cocoa leaves and pearls
Fanatic
But then why not set your processing parameters in the camera? Also RawShooter Essentials is free, very good, and is easy and quick to use.
Furniture
Because you have alot better controls and better results doing sharpening/contrast/etc on PS.
I'll look into RAWShooter.
He came dancing across the water
With his galleons and guns
Looking for the new world
In that palace in the sun
On the shore lay Montezuma
With his cocoa leaves and pearls
Enthusiast
aye haven't seen that debate before
i'm of the opinion that digital era photography evolved in comparison to the analogue times and it is so much different; one of the differences is that computer editing is INTEGRAL part of photography now, hence i think it should be allowed. some people don't know much about editing pics - me included - it's their loss, it's the same as making a bad composition or choosing bad lighting
12 cylinders or walk!
Furniture
I still think the rules are fine as they are now, with a little bit of contrast, cropping, B&W conversions and resizing as the only allowable edits.
He came dancing across the water
With his galleons and guns
Looking for the new world
In that palace in the sun
On the shore lay Montezuma
With his cocoa leaves and pearls
Super Moderator
lolz ur funniez.
I got the point, but the way it came off as it's like saying Jackson Pollack was a great painter, but does that mean all artwork should be made with random paint splatters? It's too bad your point sucks.
Member
Just following your lead.
My point is that editing or post processing, has been as much a part of photography as taking the photo itself for as long as photography has existed - more so with digital photography. And yet it on ultimatecarpage.com it is considered cheating. I don't see the logic.
My other signature has a V12
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote