Originally Posted by
NuclearCrap
That's when it comes to comparing Athlon to Pentium 4 or Athlon X2 to Pentium D. These days a 3.0Ghz X2 6000+ struggles to match the 2.4Ghz Core 2 Duo E6600. It's also proven that a E6300 underclocked to 1.6Ghz can beat a 2.0Ghz X2 3800+.
Your reading the Intel note book upside down... The dual core AMD's have beaten there counter parts nu meres times in the past and still do..
Last time i checked a independent tester done both dual cores and P4's with FX series cpu's.. What came out on top??? 70% of test done the AMD x2 was top or top 3. Epically when it came to multimedia it came out in front.
My nephews
Didn't shame my old XP2500-m Clocked to 2.4gh/z with small 512 ram. It speed wise felt the same, Smoothness it was much more superior task after task it handled the pressure and was sharp over and over again, Mine would start to slow till it builds back. That was the difference i felt.
"Just a matter of time i suppose"
"The elevator is broke, So why don't you test it out"
"I'm not trapped in here with all of you, Your all trapped in here with me"