As a very simple molecule - much simpler even than the idealized C8H18 and C6H6 of octane and benzene, respectively, that make up gasoline - you don't have to worry as much about unwanted polluting elements such as sulfur creeping into your fuel. See the prices of sweet vs. sour crude oil for another example of this playing out and their acceptability for refinement into diesel and gasoline. The sour stuff is diverted off into fuel oil (bunker fuel in maritime parlance, I believe) which can be burnt twelve nautical miles (or whatever international waters is) from anything approaching consequences...
Anyway, you get closer to the idealized hydrocarbon oxidation reaction and thus get far closer to only water and carbon dioxide in your exhaust. As a cyclist - being a cyclist is like being vegetarian: you have to tell everyone - the difference when I blow my nose after a commute behind diesel-burning and natural gas-burning buses is marked...
I'm sure your organic chemistry is much more finely-honed than mine; the nonsense chemistry they taught me as an aerospace engineer is pretty dim in the rearview mirror at this point. So you should probably be explaining this to me instead of the other way 'round.
EDIT: Also I think stoic is richer for CNG (the air fraction is smaller), so NOX is less of an issue, but I'm not sure.
Last edited by f6fhellcat13; 03-05-2021 at 07:41 PM.
"Kimi, can you improve on your [race] finish?"
"No. My Finnish is fine; I am from Finland. Do you have any water?"