Page 15 of 101 FirstFirst ... 513141516172565 ... LastLast
Results 211 to 225 of 1501

Thread: The Technical Questions Thread

  1. #211
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Quote Originally Posted by hightower99 View Post
    lubrication problems shared with 2 strokes makes them not suitable for racing
    What do you think those are ?
    Coz there aren't any "lubrication problems" except from the emissions generated by burning oil in the fuel mix.
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  2. #212
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Canuck View Post
    Because Two strokes are innefficiant. The End.
    2-stroke is MORE efficient than a normally aspirated 4-stroker.
    It's emissions that kills it for them and the racing world wanting to show it isn't esoteric and has bnefits for normal car in the street.
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  3. #213
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    True North
    Posts
    7,682
    Quote Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine View Post
    2-stroke is MORE efficient than a normally aspirated 4-stroker.
    It's emissions that kills it for them and the racing world wanting to show it isn't esoteric and has bnefits for normal car in the street.
    yeah I was a bit unclear, it more efficiant in terms of creating power but not emmissions wise, ie the burning of oil...

  4. #214
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    10,227
    Quote Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine View Post
    2-stroke is MORE efficient than a normally aspirated 4-stroker.
    It's emissions that kills it for them and the racing world wanting to show it isn't esoteric and has bnefits for normal car in the street.
    I'm pretty sure that it is more important to be seen as the winner in a racing world than it is to be seen having cars similar to road cars.

    Besides, there are privateer teams / engine suppliers in LMP1 in both the ALMS and LMS and they could develop two-strokes and dominate the competition could they not?

    Maybe it's some other restriction that keeps two-strokes out of the equation. I think there is a rule that says the car must be of a certain volume at a certain distance at idling throttle - maybe two strokes would be unable to pass this test or something.

  5. #215
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,200
    Quote Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine View Post
    2-stroke is MORE efficient than a normally aspirated 4-stroker.
    It's emissions that kills it for them and the racing world wanting to show it isn't esoteric and has bnefits for normal car in the street.
    Thermally?

    I don't think so because normally a 4 stroke is going to have much better expansion ratio coefficient (ie expansion ratio versus compression ratio) than any 2 stroke. Also 2 strokes have less volumetric efficiency because even though they intake air through a transfer port under pressure they have alot less time to fill the cylinder and the exhaust is normally open during a large part of the intake/compression strokes.


    2 stroke diesels are the exception because they have exhaust valves and use a direct intake port that is pressurized by supercharger.
    Power, whether measured as HP, PS, or KW is what accelerates cars and gets it up to top speed. Power also determines how far you take a wall when you hit it
    Engine torque is an illusion.

  6. #216
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,200
    Quote Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine View Post
    What do you think those are ?
    Coz there aren't any "lubrication problems" except from the emissions generated by burning oil in the fuel mix.
    Sorry I meant that 2 stroke engines and Wankel engines both consume oil per design.
    Power, whether measured as HP, PS, or KW is what accelerates cars and gets it up to top speed. Power also determines how far you take a wall when you hit it
    Engine torque is an illusion.

  7. #217
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    95616
    Posts
    5,357
    Is it possible to build a paddle-operated manual gearbox? I'm not talking about DSG, I mean paddles + clutch.
    I'm dropping out to create a company that starts with motorcycles, then cars, and forty years later signs a legendary Brazilian driver who has a public and expensive feud with his French teammate.

  8. #218
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    Should be. Most motorsport categories use something like that, although they usually have gearboxes which can be flatshifted and thus negate 90% use of the clutch.
    I am the Stig

  9. #219
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    10,227
    Quote Originally Posted by hightower99 View Post
    Thermally?

    I don't think so because normally a 4 stroke is going to have much better expansion ratio coefficient (ie expansion ratio versus compression ratio) than any 2 stroke. Also 2 strokes have less volumetric efficiency because even though they intake air through a transfer port under pressure they have alot less time to fill the cylinder and the exhaust is normally open during a large part of the intake/compression strokes.


    2 stroke diesels are the exception because they have exhaust valves and use a direct intake port that is pressurized by supercharger.
    All of this is not to say that a two-stroke couldn't be made to have OHC right? IT would be possible to have the Otto cycle with OHC yeah?

  10. #220
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,200
    Quote Originally Posted by Kitdy View Post
    All of this is not to say that a two-stroke couldn't be made to have OHC right? IT would be possible to have the Otto cycle with OHC yeah?
    You want to keep the number of valves to a minimum in a 2 stroke otherwise you negate one of it's major advantages. The best design is that used by 2 stroke diesels and yes you could use the same design and run it on petrol. These designs only have exhaust valves that are operated by a cam.

    It would not be efficient to have a typical 4 stroke design engine be run in 2 stroke mode.
    Power, whether measured as HP, PS, or KW is what accelerates cars and gets it up to top speed. Power also determines how far you take a wall when you hit it
    Engine torque is an illusion.

  11. #221
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,200
    Quote Originally Posted by kingofthering View Post
    Is it possible to build a paddle-operated manual gearbox? I'm not talking about DSG, I mean paddles + clutch.
    Why?

    Normally in a paddle shifted gearbox the paddle controls a whole range of things.

    When you press the shift up paddle it will normally release the clutch, shut the throttle valve quickly to drop the revs as fast as possible, select the next gear, engage clutch when engine RPM is matched.

    When you press the shift down paddle it will normally release the clutch, open throttle to WOT if it isn't already to raise revs, select the next gear, engage the clutch with properly matched engine RPM.

    What you are asking for is basically a sequential shifter that is mounted as paddles behind the steering wheel but that would make gear changes about as fast as sequential manual, and not nearly as fast as a semi-automated.
    Power, whether measured as HP, PS, or KW is what accelerates cars and gets it up to top speed. Power also determines how far you take a wall when you hit it
    Engine torque is an illusion.

  12. #222
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    10,227
    Quote Originally Posted by hightower99 View Post
    You want to keep the number of valves to a minimum in a 2 stroke otherwise you negate one of it's major advantages. The best design is that used by 2 stroke diesels and yes you could use the same design and run it on petrol. These designs only have exhaust valves that are operated by a cam.

    It would not be efficient to have a typical 4 stroke design engine be run in 2 stroke mode.
    Maybe the added weight and complexity would improve fuel economy, power and also you could also not have to add oil to the fuel - I think there would be many benefits to this design.

  13. #223
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,200
    Quote Originally Posted by Kitdy View Post
    Maybe the added weight and complexity would improve fuel economy, power and also you could also not have to add oil to the fuel - I think there would be many benefits to this design.
    No it wouldn't if you are talking about your typical 4 stroke engine design being somehow used in 2 stroke mode.

    Simplicity = 2 strokes biggest asset don't mess with it

    Efficiency = 4 strokes biggest asset.

    If you want to make 2 strokes more efficeint then you have to do so without increasing complexity, and you really need to deal with the emissions before it can be used in cars.
    Power, whether measured as HP, PS, or KW is what accelerates cars and gets it up to top speed. Power also determines how far you take a wall when you hit it
    Engine torque is an illusion.

  14. #224
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    372
    I am not trying to start controversy or anything. I'm being serious here.

    I would like to remind everyone that it is a good idea to research on your own what you have "learned" in this thread. There are a lot of half-truths being told...in particular by hightower99. I'm not picking on you hightower, I think it is cool that you want to know about cars. But lots of your info isn't 100% correct. Sorry if I offended anyone.

  15. #225
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Porto - Portugal
    Posts
    2,755
    Quote Originally Posted by -What- View Post
    I am not trying to start controversy or anything. I'm being serious here.

    I would like to remind everyone that it is a good idea to research on your own what you have "learned" in this thread. There are a lot of half-truths being told...in particular by hightower99. I'm not picking on you hightower, I think it is cool that you want to know about cars. But lots of your info isn't 100% correct. Sorry if I offended anyone.
    What have you found out that isn't correct?
    "Religious belief is the “path of least resistance”, says Boyer, while disbelief requires effort."

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The random picture thread
    By Mustang in forum Multimedia
    Replies: 489
    Last Post: 05-16-2014, 02:19 PM
  2. The "What car is it?" thread
    By The_Canuck in forum Miscellaneous
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 10-07-2005, 01:28 PM
  3. lukehow and Robb Mann thread
    By Matra et Alpine in forum Miscellaneous
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 12-12-2004, 06:54 PM
  4. About the enzo thread
    By werty in forum Website discussion
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 09-19-2004, 04:03 PM
  5. Changing thread name
    By Rijoh in forum Website discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-11-2004, 07:33 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •