Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: New type of CV Joint

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    4,031

    New type of CV Joint

    For those 'bent' on power transmission ...



    Thompson Couplings Ltd - Home

    Quote Originally Posted by "About the Thompson Coupling" page

    The Thompson Coupling is the world's first and only Constant Velocity Joint which:

    Has all loads carried by roller bearings
    Has no sliding or skidding surfaces whatsoever
    Can tolerate axial and radial loads without degradation
    Has no torque limitation, constructed to any torque level
    Does not require special lubrication
    Does not require a dust boot
    No wearing components except replaceable bearings and trunnions
    Is suitable for automotive tail or propeller shaft applications
    Is a true Constant Velocity Coupling as distinct from a cv joint
    Is less bulky than a double coupling or double Cardan joint.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    • File Type: jpg 1.jpg (17.0 KB, 120 views)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Damned impressive.
    The cage loks a bit big for car use. WOnder if it can be reduced in size.
    VERY interested to see it, woudl be superb in a race car
    Ideal for replaceing Lotus Europa's and early single seater troublesome drive shafts

    Go the Aussies -- again !!!!
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    328
    Amazing!!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    CL Illinois
    Posts
    270
    yeah i learned about these in auto 2 last year because my auto teacher felt that they were the next best thing and really thinks they will begin using them in cars.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    643
    Saw this on ‘New Inventors’ last night. Looked very impressive in its abilllity to operate on various angles.
    "Some days, you just can't get rid of a bomb!"
    "Life is short, drive fast!" - Lamborghini
    "How's that for a slice of fried gold?"
    "I'll take the case!" - Harvey Birdman

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Fort Rucker, AL
    Posts
    3,092
    This is the kind of stuff I want to make when I graduate, awesome engineering!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    For Tax Purposes, Cayman Islands
    Posts
    14,579
    I'm annoyed this didn't win the New Inventors Invention of the year - some conehead thing? come now.

    This is the wave of the future, although it does not bode well for understeering cars
    <cough> www.charginmahlazer.tumblr.com </cough>

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,200
    Certainly interesting.


    But you still need two of these per halfshaft...
    Power, whether measured as HP, PS, or KW is what accelerates cars and gets it up to top speed. Power also determines how far you take a wall when you hit it
    Engine torque is an illusion.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Quote Originally Posted by hightower99 View Post
    Certainly interesting.


    But you still need two of these per halfshaft...
    are you suggesting that solid axle is best ?
    Makes steering a FWD hard

    Of course, by removing 2 cv joints then you double the reductino in losses !
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Sydney, Down Under
    Posts
    8,833
    Quote Originally Posted by IBrake4Rainbows View Post
    I'm annoyed this didn't win the New Inventors Invention of the year - some conehead thing? come now.
    That conehead thing is going to save riders from helmets are built only to pass a test, not stop your brain squishing against the inside of your skull.

    As for this, I have no idea about CV joints so I'm staying out of it, but if you lot thing it's good, then go Aussie.
    Faster, faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death...
    – Hunter Thompson

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    For Tax Purposes, Cayman Islands
    Posts
    14,579
    The big issue the panel had w/ the conehead was that the angle of the cones was set in stone a long time ago - while he's done a lot of research into it it might pay to sort of vary the cone depending on the application.

    I've no doubt it could save lives - I just think it's a little more specialised to create a liner than to create a whole linkage system.

    Who knows - Stackhats might just end up being safer
    <cough> www.charginmahlazer.tumblr.com </cough>

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Volkswagen Karmann Ghia Type III
    By McReis in forum Classic cars
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 10-25-2020, 01:43 PM
  2. Porsche Type 64 Aerocoupe 1939
    By Revo in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 08-19-2019, 06:51 AM
  3. Honda S2000 Type R
    By lightweight in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 02-02-2007, 05:39 PM
  4. Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF)
    By NuclearCrap in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 05-10-2006, 02:04 AM
  5. CV joint help
    By Jason77 in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 04-11-2005, 05:48 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •