Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: Toyota Tundra - Engineering an Ad

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    IA
    Posts
    467

    Toyota Tundra - Engineering an Ad

    Machine Design recently had an interesting article on creating the Toyota Tundra commercials where the truck is put through a series of impressive obstacles.

    Commericals for those who haven’t seen them;

    Seesaw: YouTube - Toyota Tundra See Saw
    Ramp: YouTube - Toyota Tundra Ramp
    Pully: YouTube - Toyota Tundra "Pulley" and "Making of"
    Wrecking Hammer: YouTube - Toyota Tundra ad by Saatchi & Saatchi

    Source: Engineering an ad
    Quote Originally Posted by Machine Design
    Every once in a while, a series of television commercials comes along that is more interesting and compelling than the programs it is sponsoring. Case in point: the recent spots touting the Tundra pickup truck from Toyota. Each commercial lets has truck demonstrating its prowess on a piece of oversized playground equipment.
    Many viewers think the ads are doctored, with perhaps a touch of computer-aided chicanery, but companies responsible for the commercials and the truck insist that what you see really happened.
    Here’s a peek behind the scenes.

    THE TEMPLATE

    The creative team at Saatchi & Saatchi LA, a major advertising firm, had a simple task: convince American TV viewers that Toyota’s Tundra is a tough, rugged truck that can handle anything the average pickup driver might throw at it. So they talked to truck owners and drivers and asked them what characteristics are most important for a truck. The answers weren’t too surprising; power, braking, acceleration, stability, and towing were among the most popular,“We knew what we wanted to highlight, the attributes real truckers are interested in,” says Erich Funke, creative director at Saatchi & Saatchi LA. “So we decided to do a series of commercials that would do just that.”

    Because Toyota was planning a series of three or more commercials, the advertising agency wanted them all to have a similar look and feel, so they developed a template, a list of common features. “The ads would have to be authentic, real demonstrations that proved a point about the truck,” says Funke. “They also had to be filmed in a location that was rugged and rough, a place where the living was hard. At first, we wanted to shoot the ads at locations all across America. But the budget only allowed us to do so much, and the farther you travel, the more it costs. We ended up with locations mostly in the West. We also wanted to base the ads in part on the seven simple machines, the inclined plane, wheel and axle, lever, pulley, wedge, and screw.”

    SEESAW

    The first concept the ad team came up with was to have a truck tow a heavy load up an inclined ramp. The ramp would lead up and onto a seesaw, and when the truck drove over the fulcrum, its weight would push the seesaw down onto another ramp. Finally, the truck and loaded trailer would come to a halt while still on the ramp.

    After getting internal approval at Saatchi & Saatchi, the ad team double-checked with some engineers to make sure the plan was doable. With a thumbs-up from the engineers, the team presented it to Toyota, who fully bought into the plan. Next, they hired a production house to film the commercials, who went on to engage an engineering-consulting group. Together, the expanded team worked out the details, such as how high the fulcrum would be, what angle for the ramps, and how big a load the truck should pull. These answers had to be checked with Toyota engineers to make sure the Tundra could handle the task. (It could.)

    The team constructed a computer model of the proposed contraption and simulated the event. They also built a scaled-down physical model so Toyota managers could see what they were getting into.
    The next step was building the giant seesaw in the lonely locale they had chosen: Lone Pine, Calif., at the base of the highest mountain in the Lower 48 states.
    “The length of the two ramps and seesaw was 540 ft, with the seesaw making up 240 of those feet,” says Bruce McCloskey, a freelance production designer involved with the ads. “The fulcrum was about 60-ft tall, a number chosen by director Andrew Douglas because he thought it would look impressive.”

    The roadway slanted up (and down) at a 27.5° angle. “A testing facility determined the Tundra could climb such an incline, but it was by no means the uppermost limit,” says McCloskey. The final structure used over 350,000 lb of steel — 165,000 lb in just the seesaw portion. At the fulcrum, the seesaw rested on an 8-in.-diameter steel tube. There were no bearings, only gravity held the moving portion in place, and only the weight of the truck, along with the 10,000-lb load it was towing, would move the seesaw into the down position. There were decelerators, however. A series of 12-in. rubber dampers cushioned the shock as the seesaw came down on the far ramp. The final structure, a four-week construction job, could be seen from 4 miles away.

    Shooting the 30-sec commercial took three days and a crew of about a hundred. A safety crew did deploy some proprietary (and secret) precautionary devices, but they were never used, according to Funke. And the driver was always in radio communication with the film crew and the rest of his safety team.

    After the shoot, the structure was taken down and as much of it as possible reused in the next spot. “That gave us a common look between all the commercials,” says Funke. “But both Toyota and our company are very green-minded and we don’t like the idea of waste.” The crew also removed every piece of trash they had brought with them, leaving locations just as barren and lonely as when they found them.

    RAMP

    For the second ad in the series, a Tundra accelerates along an 800-ftlong ramp cantilevered off the edge of a cliff, going 0 to 60 mph before the driver hits the brakes, bringing it safely to stop — about 4 in. from the edge. To add more excitement, a pair of sliding steel doors positioned across the roadway begins closing as soon as the Tundra trips a photoelectric eye. If all went according to plan, the truck would have 8 in. of clearance on the left and right when it passed the closing doors. “And they were not breakaway doors,” says McCloskey, “They were all steel, in a steel frame, and ran along a guide in the roadway. They definitely would have stopped the truck.”
    To prepare the site, an abandoned iron mine, the crew used several earthmovers to remove boulders and level the ground. They also decided to elevate the roadway 3 ft on steel trusses rather than put it flat on the ground. “If we put it on the ground, we would’ve had to do some digging and extra engineering to get the road cantilevered out over the drop,” says McCloskey. “Putting it up on the trusses made it look more like a planned demonstration, and using the same steel from the previous event just helped make both ads look similar.“

    Despite the potential danger in all the ads, Funke and McCloskey insist the Tundra was a stock, off-the-showroom-floor model. “For each spot, three people from the surrounding community, usually a judge, film commissioner, and an attorney, watched the entire filming,” says McCloskey. “They also signed affidavits attesting that there was no trick photography and that the truck really performed just as we show in the ads. And those affidavits are on file in our L.A. offices.”

    Pulley

    To show the Tundra has real pulling power, a third spot has the truck on a roadway cantilevered out over a 180-ft cliff in an old rock quarry. A cable hooked to the truck’s towing hitch snakes through some pulleys and clamps and over the side of the cliff. A standard metal shipping container hangs suspended on the other end of the cable. For the commercial, a crewmen releases the clamp, letting the 6,400-lb container fall a bit, giving the truck a jolting backward tug. The truck then pulls forward, yanking the container up and over the side of the drop-off.

    ““We talked about using large pulleys, or block and tackle, which gives the truck a mechanical advantage,” says McCloskey. “But the creatives at Saatchi & Saatchi decided that anything that made it easier for the Tundra to pull the container up would be cheating. So we went with a simple pulley that would make it a one-for-one pull.”

    The production team did run into a problem with this spot: the location wasn’t exactly what they wanted. “We had spent two days scouting locations for this spot,” says McCloskey. “And after flying from New Mexico, to Arizona, and up and down California, we finally found the Sierra Rock Quarry, which seemed to have the sheer drop we needed. But once we got on site and started construction, we discovered the bottom wall of the quarry stuck out farther than we had anticipated. That meant we had to increase the amount of roadway sticking out over the cliff by 10 ft to keep the container from hitting it. The extra road also meant we had to add more steel to the roadway to counterbalance the container and add more concrete to the ballast that kept it all stable. And we had to do all this in a week.”
    "In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not."

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    IA
    Posts
    467
    Continued...

    Quote Originally Posted by Machine Design

    Wrecking hammer

    The fourth, and maybe the most impressive spot so far, involves two swinging pendulums, each with a 9,000-lb I-beam at the end. A pair of 93-ft towers held the cross members on which the pendulums swung. The production team laid a 1,500-ft asphalt roadway directly beneath and between the supporting towers. This put the road directly in the path of the swinging steel beams when they were released from their holding position 72-ft up. The truck would roar down the roadway, hitting 50 mph. At some well-calculated point, a clamp would open and the first I-beam would begin swinging, coming close to the moving truck, Not much later, the second I-beam would begin to swing free. There were no brakes on the pendulums; no way to slow or stop them.

    The truck just barely misses being struck by the first beam, comes to an abrupt stop, then has less than a second to accelerate out of the away before the second I-beam smashes into it. To make things more difficult, the Tundra is towing a trailer loaded with 10,300 lb.

    There’s been some carping about this ad and the seesaw spot by folks on the Internet saying the truck really wasn’t towing 10,000 lb, and that the ads deliberately mislead by including the 6,000-lb weight of the truck in the overall 10,000-lb figure. But Funke and McCloskey are adamant; the trailers carried 10,000 lb or more, so the truck’s engine is really moving over 16,000 lb. (And they have the affidavits to back them up.)

    There’s also been some complaints that the trailer used in these two spots is outfitted with electric brakes, so the trailer’s providing the stopping power, not the truck. “But in keeping with safe driving, you need electric brakes on trailers to drive legally on the streets,” says Funke. “Had we not used them, someone would say Toyota is implicitly endorsing the idea of not using trailer brakes. Besides, our commercials had to be in keeping with how real truckers use their trucks.”
    "In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not."

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Germany / CA
    Posts
    373
    I must say, pretty impressive. I know I had my doubts watching these ads on TV, I figured there was some loophole in the "Actual Demonstration" text they run at the beginning of each commercial. I would like to know what kind of roll cage/ further driver protection they provided, I know I sure as hell wouldn't drive towards a huge swinging pendulum in a truck with standard safety features.
    Reutlingen/ San Francisco

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    2,056
    and when will the common person who buys these trucks ever use this? i'm sick of these adds, seen them too many times. it's cool to see it in person but on TV eh....
    Gone:
    09 Ducati Monster 696
    09 Audi Q5 3.2
    03 Infiniti G35 Sedan
    07 Honda Civic Coupe LX 5spd

    Current:
    10 BMW 335d
    12 Audi Q5 2.0t
    10 VW Jetta TDI
    11 Ducati Monster 796

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    1,331
    They don't say how many trucks they went through nor do they specify if there was a driver in the truck for each of the ads. That all being said if I were buying a full-size pick-up truck I'm 90% sure I'd buy the Tundra.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    2,697
    I think these ads were very creative, you have to give credit to the marketing company who came up with the idea.
    2011 Honda Civic Si

    ATHEIST and damn proud of it.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    East Coast of the United States
    Posts
    12,007
    I guess they are true then?

    I dunno, somehow I still think they're misleading.

    Either way, nice article find!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,508
    Neat stuff but it does explain part of why the add campaign was SOOO expensive. Toyota spent as much on Tundra advertising as GM spent on creating the Kappa platform. GM got a complete (if limited in scope) platform for the price of the add campaign.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    IA
    Posts
    467
    Quote Originally Posted by culver View Post
    Neat stuff but it does explain part of why the add campaign was SOOO expensive. Toyota spent as much on Tundra advertising as GM spent on creating the Kappa platform. GM got a complete (if limited in scope) platform for the price of the add campaign.
    I don’t work in the Toyota marketing department but I willing to make three guesses:

    1) There is a lot of prejudice to overcome in the America truck market
    2) Toyota may consider the American truck market bigger than GM considers the American roadster market
    3) Toyota believes in their final solution more ;-)

    It would be nice to know definitively though.
    "In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not."

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    5,456
    Definitely the first, if not all 3. It's hard to win over people on pickup trucks in US. Most deep rooted pickup buyer(one that has bought like last 3 Silverados, or something like that) isn't likely to switch brand....so they need something really impactful to attract buyer....

    I mean we are talking about the same people who will boo Toyota at NASCAR races and throw beercans at winning drivers that aren't Dale Jr.....
    University of Toronto Formula SAE Alumni 2003-2007
    Formula Student Championship 2003, 2005, 2006
    www.fsae.utoronto.ca

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    IA
    Posts
    467
    Quote Originally Posted by Alastor View Post
    I don’t work in the Toyota marketing department but I willing to make three guesses:

    1) There is a lot of prejudice to overcome in the America truck market
    2) Toyota may consider the American truck market bigger than GM considers the American roadster market
    3) Toyota believes in their final solution more ;-)

    It would be nice to know definitively though.
    To add to my second point I just learned that the Ford F-150 has been the best selling vehicle in the U.S. for last 25 years and is currently the top selling vehicle of all time at almost 30,000,000 units sold.
    "In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not."

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    95616
    Posts
    5,357
    Quote Originally Posted by Alastor View Post
    I don’t work in the Toyota marketing department but I willing to make three guesses:

    1) There is a lot of prejudice to overcome in the America truck market
    A bit of an understatement. Apparently, there are still people who consider them to be evil foreigners who killed our people during Pearl Harbor and that buying Toyota = stealing money from America.

    Even if they are built in America and the big 3 have plants in Mexico and Canada.
    I'm dropping out to create a company that starts with motorcycles, then cars, and forty years later signs a legendary Brazilian driver who has a public and expensive feud with his French teammate.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    10,227
    Quote Originally Posted by RacingManiac View Post
    I mean we are talking about the same people who will boo Toyota at NASCAR races and throw beercans at winning drivers that aren't Dale Jr.....
    Those people are the reason I cheer for Toyota in NASCAR. Hell, I don't like any current Toyotas except the TF108 and the Tundra.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,508
    Quote Originally Posted by Alastor View Post
    I don’t work in the Toyota marketing department but I willing to make three guesses:

    1) There is a lot of prejudice to overcome in the America truck market
    2) Toyota may consider the American truck market bigger than GM considers the American roadster market
    3) Toyota believes in their final solution more ;-)

    It would be nice to know definitively though.
    I would also point out that when Toyota went after the car market it was ripe for plucking. The US domestic trucks are very good and aren't sadly lacking like many of the car offering were. Also, the reliability differences that helped drive people into foreign cars back in the day just are as big (if at all) when comparing the current crop of domestic vs foreign trucks. Basically Toyota needs to make a big splash just so people notice that their "full size" truck is no longer a 5/6th scale nice but forgettable truck. Basically, how do you get a bunch of people who have nothing against buying a Toyota but are happy with their Ford/Chevy/Dodge/Nissan to look at a Toyota? Much of it isn’t bias against Toyota so much as no good reason to switch.

    GM and Ford face the opposite bias when trying to sell cars. Even if the new Malibu is just as good and reliable as a Camry they need to convince Toyota buyers to give them a chance even though they are happy with their Toyotas.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Kyushu
    Posts
    6,039
    Quote Originally Posted by Alastor View Post
    To add to my second point I just learned that the Ford F-150 has been the best selling vehicle in the U.S. for last 25 years and is currently the top selling vehicle of all time at almost 30,000,000 units sold.
    that is a true statement, but only on a technicality. the chevy silverado, and the gmc whatever they call it, are the same truck, but for sales figures they count as 2 different trucks. the combined of the two are well over that of the ford. so there have been more GM trucks sold, but more F150s than either of the brands individually.
    Honor. Courage. Commitment. Etcetera.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Really useful performance listings...
    By Egg Nog in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 04-18-2021, 05:13 PM
  2. all cars all years 0-60 and 1/4mile time
    By matheus in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 04-26-2015, 06:29 PM
  3. Gran Turismo 5
    By Sauc3 in forum Gaming
    Replies: 1020
    Last Post: 05-19-2014, 03:16 PM
  4. GT4 whole car list!!!!
    By Mustang in forum Gaming
    Replies: 247
    Last Post: 07-07-2010, 08:06 AM
  5. Hide-Out Index
    By Sauc3 in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 06-20-2008, 02:43 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •