Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 100

Thread: Finally, the truth about speed bumps and low speed limits

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,315
    Quote Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine View Post
    THe companies running the cameras make lots and lots of profits
    good for the economy...
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    San Fernando Valley, Calif.
    Posts
    6,788
    Quote Originally Posted by henk4 View Post
    If you want to ignore speed bumps buy a big Citroen
    Big?

    Is it true that an automatic car will use more fuel doing a steady 20 mph than when doing 30?
    Yes. Some do. And some don't. Some even get better mileage at 40 mph than at 30 mph. Here is an example:


    ---------------------------- MPG @ 30 mph- @ 40 mph--- @ 50 mph
    '68 AMC Javelin (290-cu-in)------ 24.5----------- 23.5------- 20.5
    '68 Ford Mustang (289)---------- 23.5----------- 24.0------- 21.5
    '68 Dodge Charger R/T (440)----- 18.0----------- 18.0------- 16.5
    '68 Buick Riviera (430)----------- 19.0----------- 19.0------- 17.5
    '68 Ford Thunderbird (429)------- 18.5----------- 18.0------- 17.0

    '68 Mercedes 250 (152-cu-in)---- 23.5----------- 22.0------- 21.0
    '68 Rover 2000 (121)------------ 34.5------------ 31.5------- 28.0
    '68 Peugeot (99)---------------- 33.0------------ 31.5------- 29.0
    '68 Volvo 144 (109)------------- 31.5------------ 31.0------- 27.0

    '68 Ford Galaxie (302-cu-in)----------- 21.0------------ 21.5------- 20.0
    '68 Pontiac Catalina (400)------- 19.5------------ 21.5------- 22.0
    '68 Dodge Polara (318)---------- 23.5------------ 23.0------- 22.5
    '68 Chevrolet Impala (307)------ 21.0------------- 19.5------- 19.5
    '68 AMC Ambassador DPL (290)-- 22.5------------- 21.5------- 19.5

    Note: the Pontiac had a very high (2.29:1) rear axle ratio which is why it got better mileage at 50 mph than at 30 mph.
    Last edited by Fleet 500; 02-04-2008 at 02:03 PM.
    '76 Cadillac Fleetwood Seventy-Five Limousine, '95 Lincoln Town Car.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,315
    thank you very much, in the mean time we have reached 2008, and technology has moved on, also that of autoboxes....
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    San Fernando Valley, Calif.
    Posts
    6,788
    Quote Originally Posted by henk4 View Post
    thank you very much, in the mean time we have reached 2008, and technology has moved on, also that of autoboxes....
    I went back to 1968 cars because I don't think the modern magazines have mpg figures for steady 30, 40 and 50 mph speeds.
    '76 Cadillac Fleetwood Seventy-Five Limousine, '95 Lincoln Town Car.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,315
    Quote Originally Posted by Fleet 500 View Post
    I went back to 1968 cars because I don't think the modern magazines have mpg figures for steady 30, 40 and 50 mph speeds.
    yep, but you might have considered that they could be of very little relevance. Do you think I would have asked the question if modern magazines would produce such figures?
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    San Fernando Valley, Calif.
    Posts
    6,788
    Quote Originally Posted by henk4 View Post
    yep, but you might have considered that they could be of very little relevance. Do you think I would have asked the question if modern magazines would produce such figures?
    I figured that the figures for those 1960s cars were better than no figures at all.
    Besides, it should apply to modern cars, too.
    '76 Cadillac Fleetwood Seventy-Five Limousine, '95 Lincoln Town Car.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,315
    Quote Originally Posted by Fleet 500 View Post
    .
    Besides, it should apply to modern cars, too.
    why???modern cars have 5-6 speed computer controlled autoboxes, and not 2 or 3 speed torque converters....
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    San Fernando Valley, Calif.
    Posts
    6,788
    Quote Originally Posted by henk4 View Post
    why???modern cars have 5-6 speed computer controlled autoboxes, and not 2 or 3 speed torque converters....
    Because the most efficient speed for most cars, old and new, is 30-40 mph.
    '76 Cadillac Fleetwood Seventy-Five Limousine, '95 Lincoln Town Car.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,315
    Quote Originally Posted by Fleet 500 View Post
    Because the most efficient speed for most cars, old and new, is 30-40 mph.
    bullshit...
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    6,153
    Quote Originally Posted by henk4 View Post
    replace "defensive" with "effective" and you will see much more progress....
    I know what you mean but I am referring to the type of course that teaches you what to do in an emergency, where to look and how to steer and brake. Driver training should be more than assing in the road rule questions and being able to park (which everyone forgets after passing the test).

    Quote Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine View Post
    Watch out their next phase is to then deploy cameras to monitor these new speeds -- and to fine everyone caught.
    THe companies running the cameras make lots and lots of profits and nothing happens to the injury/death rate !
    Fear not Matra! We have plenty of cameras. They spend more on that technology than on building better roads I rekon. And place them in 50kph zones at the end of 60kph ones or 100kph zones at the end of 110kph ones. I wonder why that is?
    "A string is approximately nine long."
    Egg Nogg 02-04-2005, 05:07 AM

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    6,153
    Quote Originally Posted by Fleet 500 View Post
    Because the most efficient speed for most cars, old and new, is 30-40 mph.
    It has more to do with the engine revs and effective torque range than the actual speed.
    "A string is approximately nine long."
    Egg Nogg 02-04-2005, 05:07 AM

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    San Fernando Valley, Calif.
    Posts
    6,788
    Quote Originally Posted by henk4 View Post
    bull...
    Then post some cars which get better fuel mileage at over 40 mph compared to 30-40.
    '76 Cadillac Fleetwood Seventy-Five Limousine, '95 Lincoln Town Car.

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    San Fernando Valley, Calif.
    Posts
    6,788
    Wait a minute... alllow me to make a correction. There are some cars that get better mileage at 50 mph than at 30 or 40 mph. Like the Pontiac I posted before:

    '68 Pontiac Catalina (400-cu-in engine, 290 hp, 2.29:1 axle ratio, 4,133 lbs curb weight)

    MPG @ steady:

    30 mph------------ 19.5
    40 mph------------ 21.5
    50 mph------------ 22.0
    60 mph------------ 19.0
    70 mph------------ 17.5
    '76 Cadillac Fleetwood Seventy-Five Limousine, '95 Lincoln Town Car.

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,431
    Quote Originally Posted by Fleet 500 View Post
    Then post some cars which get better fuel mileage at over 40 mph compared to 30-40.
    This isn't highly scientific but the trip computer in the BMW seems to get the best numbers (regarding range, so aplicable to fuel consumption) at about either around 80km/h (~50mph) in fifth or around 110km/h (~68mph) in sixth. However if you decrease the speed the range decreases too. And the same happens if you increase the speed.
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,315
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
    This isn't highly scientific but the trip computer in the BMW seems to get the best numbers (regarding range, so aplicable to fuel consumption) at about either around 80km/h (~50mph) in fifth or around 110km/h (~68mph) in sixth. However if you decrease the speed the range decreases too. And the same happens if you increase the speed.
    I'll do some experiments with my trip computer today. And not looking at the range, but looking at the actual fuel consumption at a given speed in a given gear. (like running idle in the lower three gears)
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •