Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567
Results 91 to 100 of 100

Thread: Finally, the truth about speed bumps and low speed limits

  1. #91
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,778
    Quote Originally Posted by henk4 View Post
    Is this really the case? It is unthinkable in most European countries to have the law enforced by private companies. Even the companies that check on parking meters are part of the lower government.
    NO here Pieter
    Street parking meters and ticketing for illegal parking is private company.
    Speed cameras are "partnerships" with Police, but in reality it's a private company.
    Problem is the private companies give targets to their staff, so they can be over-zealous.. It's now VERY common to be given a fixed penalty fine of £30 4 mins after a parking ticket time !
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  2. #92
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    why would I tell you?
    Posts
    108
    Somewhat relevant.

    As the Portland Mercury reports, Eric Bryant was sitting in a Japanese resturant when he saw a cop park under a no parking sign, then come inside, order lunch, and started watching the game on TV. When Bryant asked the officer about his choice in parking spots he acknowledge that he was parked in a no parking zone, but that there was nothing wrong with that as he was a cop. The officer then asked “If someone broke into your house, would you rather have the police be able to park in front of your house or have to park three blocks away and walk there?”

    According to Bryant “If he had acknowledged and corrected his error, we could have avoided this whole thing but instead, he kept watching basketball and told me he wasn’t doing anything wrong.” This bothered Eric, so he took the next step and initiated violation proceedings against Officer Stensgaard, racking up $540 in fines for the officer for “illegal parking, illegal stopping, obeying parking restrictions on state highways, and illegal operation of an emergency vehicle or ambulance” if the officer in convicted on his court date May 23rd.

  3. #93
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Wishing I was in Moscow, Idaho
    Posts
    2,585
    Quote Originally Posted by henk4 View Post
    Is this really the case? It is unthinkable in most European countries to have the law enforced by private companies. Even the companies that check on parking meters are part of the lower government.
    In the case of speed and stoplight cameras, as far as I know they are run exclusively by private companies, and most of the revenue from tickets are then given to those companies.

    The reasoning behind this was that government agencies are so ineffecient due to all the restrictions and extra checks and balances placed upon them, that they thought things would run more smoothly in the hands of private companies. And, since the companies won't work for free, they decided to give a (large) percentage of the cash to those companies. So you go into a US court same as normal, but all the evidence against you is provided by those companies.

    Friend of mine moved to an area with stoplight cameras and recieved a ticket by mail one day, despite the fact that he had been out of state with relatives on the day in question. The guy before him in court got out of his two tickets because they were 12 miles and 15 minutes apart in the middle of a large city and it was deemed impossible to have made it from one light to the other in that time period. My friend could not get out of his because the only witnesses to his location on the day in question were relatives who were considered unreliable witnesses, even though someone had proven the cameras were not working correctly only seconds before.

  4. #94
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    4,031
    Consider the implications when lower government is allowed to derive income through 'aggressive' traffic enforcement. (ie speed traps)
    A study just released from George Mason University’s economics department .. detail[s] a number of facts:

    Police officers report to a Chief of Police who is appointed by government officials.
    Government officials are elected with the major responsibilities of assessment of taxes and appointment of town officials.
    There is a positive relationship between police budgets and traffic fines.
    Police salaries for officers and sergeants increase with the size of the police budget.
    Police personnel budget increases with fine and forfeiture revenues.

    In Massachusetts, where the study was conducted, there are limitations on the revenue municipalities can raise through fees, licenses and permits, but there is no statute or regulation on fines. Furthermore, municipalities retain 50 percent of the revenues collected from traffic fines.

  5. #95
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Derby, England
    Posts
    2,192
    Quote Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine View Post
    NO here Pieter
    Street parking meters and ticketing for illegal parking is private company.
    Speed cameras are "partnerships" with Police, but in reality it's a private company.
    Problem is the private companies give targets to their staff, so they can be over-zealous.. It's now VERY common to be given a fixed penalty fine of £30 4 mins after a parking ticket time !
    Peter, do you read Evo? There was an interesting article in this month's issue detailing just how many threats a car enthusiast faces in Britain in the near future.

    It'd be interesting to follow the head of the DFT, Gordon Brown, Ken Livingstone and anyone else backing the dirty schemes mentioned in this thread around and penalise them for every instance of speeding, bad driving (including their chauffeurs) and note how polluting their chosen methods of transport are (Jag XJs and other Gov't limos are hardly "green" are they?).
    "This is hardcore." - Evo's John Barker on the TVR Tuscan S

  6. #96
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    Posts
    7,827
    Quote Originally Posted by nota View Post
    Consider the implications when lower government is allowed to derive income through 'aggressive' traffic enforcement. (ie speed traps)
    Allready been here for a while. Worst thing is that they have a minimum number of fines they have to give. Meaning that in december you are really screwed. Being 60 cm out of a parkng space, not blocking anything or anyone cost me €50

  7. #97
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    3,560
    That would be due to the size of the Alto you had more then half it out!

    How can you possibly drive so poorly you can't park it in a space?
    Chief of Secret Police and CFO - Brotherhood of Jelly
    No Mr. Craig, I expect you to die! On the inside. Of heartbreak. You emo bitch

  8. #98
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Wishing I was in Moscow, Idaho
    Posts
    2,585
    Quote Originally Posted by drakkie View Post
    Allready been here for a while. Worst thing is that they have a minimum number of fines they have to give. Meaning that in december you are really screwed. Being 60 cm out of a parkng space, not blocking anything or anyone cost me €50
    They had that here for a while but people decided it was a dumbass practice and we got rid of it. Well, officially anyways. Glad of that, at least.

    EDIT: The quotas, I mean.

  9. #99
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Derby, England
    Posts
    2,192
    Quote Originally Posted by wwgkd View Post
    They had that here for a while but people decided it was a dumbass practice and we got rid of it. Well, officially anyways. Glad of that, at least.

    EDIT: The quotas, I mean.
    Whereas here, if the local autority or Government can stick a "green" tag on an idea, anything goes!

    We now face a £950 tax on any new car that emits more than 255g/km of C02 - despite the fact that it'll barely effect C02 emissions from vehicles in general. It's about the money though - the Government stand to make billions out of this alone.
    "This is hardcore." - Evo's John Barker on the TVR Tuscan S

  10. #100
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    Posts
    7,827
    Quote Originally Posted by Cyco View Post
    That would be due to the size of the Alto you had more then half it out!

    How can you possibly drive so poorly you can't park it in a space?
    ha ha it was a street with spots along the side of it, but not continuous. Anyway, I was eager to go to the bar and see my g/f and mates, didn't notice the lines due to snow fall and parked it a little out of the spot. I came into the street, dropped it at the spot closest to me. It's like nothing special, but I still feel bloody screwed. It's not like the side or something was in another spot, because there was no 2nd spot..Whatever. Im starting to stop understanding myself. Time for beer.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •