Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 34

Thread: GM failure: The Shockwave

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    south beloit IL
    Posts
    875
    Quote Originally Posted by Equinox View Post
    While I do agree that the UAW is a big problem to the "big 3's"... I also have to say that the management is crap. I watched part of the hearing today, and found it funny how the CEO's all took their own private jets at a cost of thousands of dollars (Which their respective companies will probably pay for,) and then when asked if the CEO's would take a pay cut, they all refused. So while the workers are taking pay cuts, the management will not, even though they make over 10 million dollars each... Funny about that eh!

    It is hard to get sympathy when your firing workers to try and save money, while your still making millions... Plus saying if your company fails it will mean millions out of work, but at the rate the big 3 are going... Most of their workers will be out of work anyways.

    I say let them go for chapter 11 and the management be fired... Then they can work on better contracts with the UAW. Plus drop some of their brands. Personally I think Ford, GM, and Chrysler have to many models and brands that compete with each other. Like Ford has Volvo, Lincoln etc. That are in competition with each other, meanwhile they are owned by the same company.
    I 100% totally agree with that statement as well.

    I have a gm plant and a chrysler plant in my area. The GM one is closed and chrysler is having major layoffs. Tons of people losing their jobs. Its very sad to see my friends and family this way but in all reality this was inevitable with the way things were going
    My rides:
    1999 Mustang GT

    1974 Ford Country Squire (for sale!)

    1991 Jeep Cherokee

    1970 Shelby GT500

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Southeast US
    Posts
    5,582
    Quote Originally Posted by Equinox View Post
    While I do agree that the UAW is a big problem to the "big 3's"... I also have to say that the management is crap. I watched part of the hearing today, and found it funny how the CEO's all took their own private jets at a cost of thousands of dollars (Which their respective companies will probably pay for,) and then when asked if the CEO's would take a pay cut, they all refused. So while the workers are taking pay cuts, the management will not, even though they make over 10 million dollars each... Funny about that eh!

    It is hard to get sympathy when your firing workers to try and save money, while your still making millions... Plus saying if your company fails it will mean millions out of work, but at the rate the big 3 are going... Most of their workers will be out of work anyways.

    I say let them go for chapter 11 and the management be fired... Then they can work on better contracts with the UAW. Plus drop some of their brands. Personally I think Ford, GM, and Chrysler have to many models and brands that compete with each other. Like Ford has Volvo, Lincoln etc. That are in competition with each other, meanwhile they are owned by the same company.
    You're partially wrong. Wagoner has already cut his pay 50% but he did waffle on reducing it to nothing. Nardelli said he absolutely would wave his pay. The Ford CEO stammered around and never said he would or wouldn't, then again they aren't in as bad of shape as the others.

    As far as the private jets...those are offices that fly...I don't think it's entirely unreasonable even under the circumstances if you have international locations to use the jet. Everything management does needs to be done efficiently and using their own jet is more efficient than messing around at airports.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    14
    i agree that the free market needs to stay free...maybe it is time for GM to start selling off parts of itself to stay afloat?

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328
    Quote Originally Posted by bypopulardemand View Post
    i agree that the free market needs to stay free...maybe it is time for GM to start selling off parts of itself to stay afloat?
    who would want which part?
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Northampton, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    7,989
    They weren't private jets. They're corporate jets. And these guys are too busy trying to save their companies to fly United Air.
    [O o)O=\x/=O(o O]

    The things we do for girls who won't sleep with us.

    Patrick says:
    dads is too long so it wont fit
    so i took hers out
    and put mine in

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Hewleett and Packard managed to run the company fine with no personal company jets.
    The t**t Carly Fiorina came in, got herslef some private jets and that was only her third worst decision.
    Gladly rid of her and her CEOs-are-gods philosphy.

    Quiggs, you've just proved why American CEOs are now liabilities rather than assets !!!!
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Southeast US
    Posts
    5,582
    Some agreement has been reached by the politicians to float some to the Big 3.

    No details yet but I would guess they have stripped the requirements attached to the 25 billion so they can use the monies for daily operations...then they'll let Obama worry about the next hand out when he is handed the basket of crap.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Look at the flag!
    Posts
    705
    I don't know if anyone else heard... But I was just watching the news and they said the Bailout is dead.

    Here's an article I found at: Bloomberg.com: Worldwide

    GM Tumbles to Lowest Since '30s, Ford Falls as Aid Plan Falters

    By John Hughes and Jeff Green

    Nov. 20 (Bloomberg) -- General Motors Corp. fell toward its lowest since the 1930s after U.S. lawmakers deadlocked on an auto-industry bailout, raising the prospect it could run out of cash before a new Congress can come to the rescue next year. Ford Motor Co. tumbled to a 28-year low.

    Democratic congressional leaders disagreed with Republicans and President George W. Bush's administration over how to provide $25 billion in aid to GM, Ford and Chrysler LLC. Only two days remain in a lame-duck session to resurrect a compromise, though Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said today Congress might return in December to finish its work.

    ``The desire is we complete all of our actions until we come back on Jan. 6, but that may not be possible,'' the Nevada Democrat said. ``It may be necessary that we come back after Thanksgiving.''

    Reid earlier suggested the situation was dire and refused to set aside time today to debate a compromise proposed by Senator Kit Bond, a Missouri Republican. Reid said Bond's plan hasn't been put in writing and the House of Representatives is about to adjourn.

    Bond and fellow Republican George Voinovich of Ohio insisted they weren't giving up on their proposal to speed up and broaden access to $25 billion already approved for fuel- efficient vehicle development that was a compromise.

    A Democratic plan to help the automakers with funds from the recently approved $700 billion bank-rescue package stalled in the face of Republican opposition and a Bush veto threat. It may be revived next year after President-elect Barack Obama takes office in January and Democrats install a strengthened majority in both houses.

    GM, the biggest U.S. automaker, said Nov. 7 it may run short of the $11 billion minimum cash it needs to pay its bills each month by the end of this year and will fall ``significantly'' short of that level by the middle of next year.

    Cash Augmentation

    The Detroit automaker burned through $6.9 billion in cash in the third quarter and had $16.2 billion on Sept. 30. Wagoner said yesterday he expects the automaker to slow its cash use to the $3.6 billion a quarter rate of the first half of this year.

    ``We're continuing to do everything we can to augment our cash position,'' Wagoner said in an interview yesterday after eight hours of testimony split between the U.S. House and Senate over two days.
    So it looks like while the plan is not 'dead' yet... Just put on hold until after Thanksgiving or January at the latest. GM may be in big trouble now.

    Read the entire article above... It is a pretty good read.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Edit:

    Now I don't know whats going on. Article: Bloomberg.com: Worldwide

    Now there saying deal has been met

    U.S. Stocks Gyrate as Auto-Industry Rescue Offsets Jobless Rise

    By Eric Martin

    Nov. 20 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. stocks swung between gains and losses as prospects that lawmakers will agree on a plan to rescue the auto industry offset a jump in jobless claims.

    General Motors Corp. rallied as much as 43 percent, reversing a 39 percent slide that sent the largest U.S. carmaker to its lowest price since 1938, after an aide to Democratic Senator Carl Levin said a compromise has been reached. Ford Motor Co. jumped 21 percent for its steepest advance since at least 1980.
    Last edited by Equinox; 11-20-2008 at 11:39 AM.
    The statistics on sanity are that one out of every four Americans is suffering from some form of mental illness. Think of your three best friends. If they're okay, then it's you.
    -Rita Mae Brown-

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,488
    Quote Originally Posted by henk4 View Post
    who would want which part?
    I'd happily buy Saab.

    (if I had the money)
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Look at the flag!
    Posts
    705
    Quote Originally Posted by Quiggs View Post
    They weren't private jets. They're corporate jets. And these guys are too busy trying to save their companies to fly United Air.
    Corporate jet = Private jet. Even if it was a corporate jet, it was still a private jet that costs thousands of dollars. You have pilots, flight crew, fuel costs etc. I'm pretty sure when your the CEO of Ford or GM, it would not be hard to get past the security/ luggage department of an airport to fly business class or first class.

    Or, since they did not go to Washington as competitors, but rather 'allies' trying to get money... Could they not have taken just one jet between them. Instead of each taking their own jet.

    Yes they do need the jets for international travel. But going from Detroit to Washington is not an international flight (It's a flight that takes what.... A few hours.) I agree with Metra that this just shows they are more liabilities than assets.
    The statistics on sanity are that one out of every four Americans is suffering from some form of mental illness. Think of your three best friends. If they're okay, then it's you.
    -Rita Mae Brown-

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Wishing I was in Moscow, Idaho
    Posts
    2,585
    Quote Originally Posted by Equinox View Post
    Corporate jet = Private jet. Even if it was a corporate jet, it was still a private jet that costs thousands of dollars. You have pilots, flight crew, fuel costs etc. I'm pretty sure when your the CEO of Ford or GM, it would not be hard to get past the security/ luggage department of an airport to fly business class or first class.

    Or, since they did not go to Washington as competitors, but rather 'allies' trying to get money... Could they not have taken just one jet between them. Instead of each taking their own jet.

    Yes they do need the jets for international travel. But going from Detroit to Washington is not an international flight (It's a flight that takes what.... A few hours.) I agree with Metra that this just shows they are more liabilities than assets.
    Not really the same thing. Corporate jets are available to many in the company and are really more of a very fast office. It allows them to continue working with resources and privacy they wouldn't have on a commercial liner. Also, security guards hate people who say "do you know who I am?" so that they can jump ahead of everyone else and sail through checkpoints faster. Given how much they are paid, it actually saves money to give them the ability to continue working as effeciently as possible.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Southeast US
    Posts
    5,582
    The latest.

    Excerpt:

    What do we take away from all this? The Big 3 will get no assurance of federal aid before Thanksgiving, and there's still no guarantee they'll get help after the break. The ball is again back in the court of the Big 3 CEOs, who need to show up in December with detailed plans of how each would use any federal aid. The Democrats are calling for "accountability" and "viability" in their proposals, which are due to Congress by December 2.

    Aw Snap! Congressional Democrats undercut compromise bailout bill - Autoblog

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Quote Originally Posted by wwgkd View Post
    Given how much they are paid, it actually saves money to give them the ability to continue working as effeciently as possible.
    That's just CEO egotistical BS

    I flew the same jets -- and the SAME SEATS -- as every manager in HP.
    That attitude made the company "great". Idiots like John Young and then Fiorina never knew how to run a real business .... but WERE able to pamper herself ( and emply relatives !!! )

    Current CEOs and supporters woudl do well to see what actually MADE US industry world class and then compare that with the mess they've made of it.
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    14
    Not a fan of GM, glad they are being punished.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    931
    Quote Originally Posted by Quiggs View Post
    Kill the UAW.
    In order to kill the UAW the company must go into bankruptcy. As long as the government "loans" them money the UAW still has a reason to exist. I dont see why everyone fears a bankruptcy. It will allow them to sell off bad assets, focus their production on more profitable vehicles, and best of all nullifies their contracts with the UAW workers and retirees allowing them to hire non-union workers at a more reasonable wage.

    They would probably emerge a stronger and better company in the long run if we allowed this to happen instead of sending tax dollars to buy a UAW worker's boat on Lake Superior.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. GM's troubles lead to cuts in racing programs.
    By Dino Scuderia in forum Racing forums
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-30-2008, 02:17 PM
  2. GM ending employee discount promotion.
    By Quiggs in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 07-28-2005, 08:16 PM
  3. Billionare buys GM stock.
    By Quiggs in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 05-08-2005, 11:18 PM
  4. Fiat looking to force GM out of the boardroom
    By Matra et Alpine in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-18-2005, 07:46 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •