Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 61

Thread: Jaguar XFR

  1. #46
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,315
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
    I wonder what a normally aspirated diesel with modern technology could do.
    I think the last one available was the SDI Golf. It produced 75 BHP from 1.9 liter, ECE was 5.4 liter, The 90 BHP TDi did 5.1....
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,442
    Quote Originally Posted by henk4 View Post
    I think the last one available was the SDI Golf. It produced 75 BHP from 1.9 liter, ECE was 5.4 liter, The 90 BHP TDi did 5.1....
    That didn't have common rail though (altough niether did the turbocharged variant).
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  3. #48
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,315
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
    That didn't have common rail though (altough niether did the turbocharged variant).
    the pump jet VAG engine were most of the time more frugal than the CR diesels. They were phased out because of the noise and the difficulties to meet emission standards.
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,315
    Dutch prices for the new XF versions
    XF 600 NM :72000 Euro, 0-100 5.9 secs, ECE 6.7 liter/100km
    XF 625 NM :138000 Euro 0-100 4.9 secs ECE 12.5 liter/100km
    (Another prime example of the law of diminishing returns)
    Last edited by henk4; 01-12-2009 at 01:36 AM.
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Porto - Portugal
    Posts
    2,755
    Quote Originally Posted by henk4 View Post
    Dutch prices for the new XF versions
    XF 600 NM :72000 Euro, 0-100 5.9 secs, ECE 6.7 liter/100km
    XF 625 NM :138000 Euro 0-100 4.9 secs ECE 12.5 liter/100km
    (Another prime example of the law of diminishing returns)
    Almost twice the price for a second less from 0 to 100 and a different noise, i don't believe it's worth it in this car, and the diesel suits it so much better.

  6. #51
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,442
    Quote Originally Posted by henk4 View Post
    Dutch prices for the new XF versions
    XF 600 NM :72000 Euro, 0-100 5.9 secs, ECE 6.7 liter/100km
    XF 625 NM :138000 Euro 0-100 4.9 secs ECE 12.5 liter/100km
    (Another prime example of the law of diminishing returns)
    Uh yes, because torque is everything.
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  7. #52
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,315
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
    Uh yes, because torque is everything.
    no it is not, but it does help a lot.
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  8. #53
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,442
    Quote Originally Posted by henk4 View Post
    no it is not, but it does help a lot.
    I'm sorry Pieter but I can't agree with you here.

    Saying the diesel Jag is better because you get better bang for buck is completely missing the point of a Jag.
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  9. #54
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,315
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
    I'm sorry Pieter but I can't agree with you here.

    Saying the diesel Jag is better because you get better bang for buck is completely missing the point of a Jag.
    if the point is money, yes, then I am missing the point
    btw, I can't remember the day where my revcounter showed me the number where my engine develops maximum power, but everytime I drive I notice when I am at maximum torque...
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  10. #55
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Gran Canaria, Spain
    Posts
    3,525
    Quote Originally Posted by Clivey View Post
    There are no manual XFs, period. It would massively change the character of the car, and I'm not sure if that's what Jaguar want. Besides: Apart from us "hardcore" enthusiasts, who's going to buy manual XFs? <2% of customers?

    I heard that BMW were going to make M5s available in the 'States with manual 'boxes. Anyone know if that's happened yet?
    In the good ol' days ALL M5s were fitted with manual boxes, and personally I think that's the way it should be. With the 535 available with an automatic transmission there just wasn't a need for an automatic M range. A driver's car can't be automatic, period.

    Only because of the gearbox I have no interest what so ever in the XK-range among others and that is a shame, same goes for this creation. Anyone can rant all day about how fast the gear changes are or how convenient it is in traffic, but in a car that is supposed to be the least bit exciting a manual box is a must.

    Automatics are wanted and probably needed too for people using the car to get from point A to B but as long as I find a hint of excitement in driving a car I'll avoid them like the plague. But if that day comes sportiness would most likely be a con instead of a pro and again cars like these lose their points...

    ...for me. So if they want to continue building automatic XFs, that's great - but any attempt to make them exciting results in immediate failure. Oh, and anyone who disagrees is wrong.
    http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=31695
    - Are YOU listed? -

  11. #56
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Wishing I was in Moscow, Idaho
    Posts
    2,585
    Quote Originally Posted by henk4 View Post
    if the point is money, yes, then I am missing the point
    btw, I can't remember the day where my revcounter showed me the number where my engine develops maximum power, but everytime I drive I notice when I am at maximum torque...
    That may be because you have a lot of torque, but not much power. It's the opposite in something like an S2000.
    Big cities suck

    "Not putting miles on your Ferrari is like not having sex with your girlfriend so she'll be more desirable to her next boyfriend." -Napolis

  12. #57
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,315
    Quote Originally Posted by wwgkd View Post
    That may be because you have a lot of torque, but not much power. It's the opposite in something like an S2000.
    I can assure you that any S2000 driver will be more in the max torque rev range than around max power.....
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  13. #58
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,442
    Quote Originally Posted by Pando View Post
    In the good ol' days ALL M5s were fitted with manual boxes, and personally I think that's the way it should be. With the 535 available with an automatic transmission there just wasn't a need for an automatic M range. A driver's car can't be automatic, period.

    Only because of the gearbox I have no interest what so ever in the XK-range among others and that is a shame, same goes for this creation. Anyone can rant all day about how fast the gear changes are or how convenient it is in traffic, but in a car that is supposed to be the least bit exciting a manual box is a must.

    Automatics are wanted and probably needed too for people using the car to get from point A to B but as long as I find a hint of excitement in driving a car I'll avoid them like the plague. But if that day comes sportiness would most likely be a con instead of a pro and again cars like these lose their points...

    ...for me. So if they want to continue building automatic XFs, that's great - but any attempt to make them exciting results in immediate failure. Oh, and anyone who disagrees is wrong.
    +1
    Quote Originally Posted by henk4 View Post
    I can assure you that any S2000 driver will be more in the max torque rev range than around max power.....
    There's no such thing as max torque in an S2000.

    To reach max power just leave it in first. All the time.
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  14. #59
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,442
    Quote Originally Posted by bigu View Post
    XFR is child of XF?
    It's the "I want to eat my german opposition for breakfast" version of the XF.
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  15. #60
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,442
    Quote Originally Posted by bigu View Post
    Oh, sorry for my English.
    Don't worry I was just trying to be a bit funny.
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. all cars all years 0-60 and 1/4mile time
    By matheus in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 04-26-2015, 06:29 PM
  2. Gran Turismo 5
    By Sauc3 in forum Gaming
    Replies: 1020
    Last Post: 05-19-2014, 03:16 PM
  3. Jaguar XJ Series, the History of (1968-2003)
    By Revo in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 11-27-2009, 04:33 AM
  4. Hide-Out Index
    By Sauc3 in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 06-20-2008, 02:43 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •