Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 30 of 30

Thread: Ford #1 in Canada for June

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Modena
    Posts
    9,826
    Quote Originally Posted by NSXType-R View Post
    Then it'll only help the image of the company. Not a bad idea to do it without the help of the government. I mean, people are rightly annoyed that we help prop up a company that many people didn't want to help.

    It shows that you're somewhat competent.



    Tesla, of all companies? I consider them to be a vaporware company- behind on their promises, even worse with the delivery of their product.

    And electric cars are not the way to go, at least with the technology we have. Production of electricity has to change, as well as the storage of it.
    I think Tesla's electric technology isn't a reference for the actual state of art in the field. They used old batteries and a pretty standard motor. Venturi's and other prototypes from Japan are way more advanced, but also far away from production, at least a mass production.
    More than Tesla, I hate Musk and his motormouth's BS.
    KFL Racing Enterprises - Kicking your ass since 2008

    *cough* http://theitalianjunkyard.blogspot.com/ *cough*

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Tesla's decision to go with "laptop batteries" is very sound when you look at $/kw.
    Getting better density or capacity is still ultra expensive.
    The choice of re-use of Lotus designs shows a great vision of not getting carried away with own capabilities and concentrate on pulling toegther KNOWN items to make a new solution.
    Their battery redundancy design is quite neat
    So IMHO they used the engineering time to get it working and manufacturable and saleable more than a one-off prototype with substantial subsidy and unknown manufacturing.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Modena
    Posts
    9,826
    Quote Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine View Post
    Tesla's decision to go with "laptop batteries" is very sound when you look at $/kw.
    Getting better density or capacity is still ultra expensive.
    The choice of re-use of Lotus designs shows a great vision of not getting carried away with own capabilities and concentrate on pulling toegther KNOWN items to make a new solution.
    Their battery redundancy design is quite neat
    So IMHO they used the engineering time to get it working and manufacturable and saleable more than a one-off prototype with substantial subsidy and unknown manufacturing.
    Surely the Roadster is a good product (which may be different from a good car, whatever), still Musk sounds like an ass 9/10 of the times I heard an interview of him or read an article about it.
    KFL Racing Enterprises - Kicking your ass since 2008

    *cough* http://theitalianjunkyard.blogspot.com/ *cough*

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    5,456
    What I don't particularly like about the whole Tesla deal is that all the presses and "owners" (ie Letterman) are touting it as something that the "small guys triumph over the big corporate" and got something done. The amount of work that was done was nothing revolutionary, and when you can stick a $100K+ price tag on something that is not really 100% finished you get a ton of leeway that bigger company that makes tens and thousands of cars can't get away with. And then on top of that you get their people trash talking about GM's approach with Volt with the plug-in and IC engine to charge the batt for extended range, on top of the whole deal of trying to shunning the Detroit's infrastructure(and people) for supporting a mass production automotive environment for California. All just kinda adds up to a pretty ill-conceive concept for someone's science experiment as opposed to an actual product....

    It also doesn't boast well for the US Federal government to buy into the hype and gave them a ton of money for it, when actual companies like A123(major battery supplier) who applied for government grant did not receive a dime.....

    I look on with interest expecting to see a pretty spectacular failure in the near future....
    University of Toronto Formula SAE Alumni 2003-2007
    Formula Student Championship 2003, 2005, 2006
    www.fsae.utoronto.ca

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    East Coast of the United States
    Posts
    12,007
    Quote Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine View Post
    Tesla's decision to go with "laptop batteries" is very sound when you look at $/kw.
    Getting better density or capacity is still ultra expensive.
    The choice of re-use of Lotus designs shows a great vision of not getting carried away with own capabilities and concentrate on pulling toegther KNOWN items to make a new solution.
    Their battery redundancy design is quite neat
    So IMHO they used the engineering time to get it working and manufacturable and saleable more than a one-off prototype with substantial subsidy and unknown manufacturing.
    I wonder how Fisker is doing? Have they unveiled anything? How come the hybrid thingy they unveiled recently haven't gotten any reviews?

    Quote Originally Posted by LeonOfTheDead View Post
    Surely the Roadster is a good product (which may be different from a good car, whatever), still Musk sounds like an ass 9/10 of the times I heard an interview of him or read an article about it.
    Quote Originally Posted by RacingManiac View Post
    What I don't particularly like about the whole Tesla deal is that all the presses and "owners" (ie Letterman) are touting it as something that the "small guys triumph over the big corporate" and got something done. The amount of work that was done was nothing revolutionary, and when you can stick a $100K+ price tag on something that is not really 100% finished you get a ton of leeway that bigger company that makes tens and thousands of cars can't get away with. And then on top of that you get their people trash talking about GM's approach with Volt with the plug-in and IC engine to charge the batt for extended range, on top of the whole deal of trying to shunning the Detroit's infrastructure(and people) for supporting a mass production automotive environment for California. All just kinda adds up to a pretty ill-conceive concept for someone's science experiment as opposed to an actual product....

    It also doesn't boast well for the US Federal government to buy into the hype and gave them a ton of money for it, when actual companies like A123(major battery supplier) who applied for government grant did not receive a dime.....

    I look on with interest expecting to see a pretty spectacular failure in the near future....
    That's what I said- Tesla is a lot of vaporware.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Wishing I was in Moscow, Idaho
    Posts
    2,585
    Quote Originally Posted by RacingManiac View Post
    What I don't particularly like about the whole Tesla deal is that all the presses and "owners" (ie Letterman) are touting it as something that the "small guys triumph over the big corporate" and got something done. The amount of work that was done was nothing revolutionary, and when you can stick a $100K+ price tag on something that is not really 100% finished you get a ton of leeway that bigger company that makes tens and thousands of cars can't get away with. And then on top of that you get their people trash talking about GM's approach with Volt with the plug-in and IC engine to charge the batt for extended range, on top of the whole deal of trying to shunning the Detroit's infrastructure(and people) for supporting a mass production automotive environment for California. All just kinda adds up to a pretty ill-conceive concept for someone's science experiment as opposed to an actual product....

    It also doesn't boast well for the US Federal government to buy into the hype and gave them a ton of money for it, when actual companies like A123(major battery supplier) who applied for government grant did not receive a dime.....

    I look on with interest expecting to see a pretty spectacular failure in the near future....
    But the US government ALWAYS has to buy into green hype or they're labled as "the cause of global warming" by their opponents. Anyone who trys to take a reasonable approach instead of chasing fads which often turn out to be pretty wrong gets bashed for not caring or being to scared to do anything about it.

    Am I the only one that sees the similarities between Hennesey performance and Tesla?
    Big cities suck

    "Not putting miles on your Ferrari is like not having sex with your girlfriend so she'll be more desirable to her next boyfriend." -Napolis

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    5,456
    I think Hennesey at least made demo cars that can deliver on the performance claim, whereas Tesla can't quite even do that....
    University of Toronto Formula SAE Alumni 2003-2007
    Formula Student Championship 2003, 2005, 2006
    www.fsae.utoronto.ca

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    in a house
    Posts
    1,264
    Quote Originally Posted by LeonOfTheDead View Post
    It's not Ford topping Toyota, but rather Toyota playing so bad. Ford has improved but not as much as Toyota is "declining".
    how is toyota declining?
    it was actually me who killed vasilli zaitsev, heinz thorwald, carlos hatchcock, and simo hayha

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, Milky Way Galaxy, Universe.
    Posts
    2,287
    Quote Originally Posted by blingbling View Post
    how is toyota declining?
    i actually thought of the same thing as well.
    Buddy: 1998-2009
    Mah boi, UCP is what all true warriors strive for!
    PINGAS!!!!

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,488
    Being down 18% last month is quite a decline don't you think?
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    5,456
    Toyota's credit rating have also been downgraded by US banks. They are cited to be reacting slower than expected to the worse than expected downturn.

    They are expecting to lose 5.5 billion GBP this year, this is based on the claims from the news relating to Fuji Speedway dropped from hosting Japanese GP because Toyota don't want to pay for it anymore(Fuji is currently on an agreement to host Japanese GP on a rotating basis between it and Suzuka, starting last year, Suzuka is hosting this year's race).
    University of Toronto Formula SAE Alumni 2003-2007
    Formula Student Championship 2003, 2005, 2006
    www.fsae.utoronto.ca

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    East Coast of the United States
    Posts
    12,007
    Quote Originally Posted by blingbling View Post
    how is toyota declining?
    I don't think Honda is doing that great either. But none of them are doing well.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, Milky Way Galaxy, Universe.
    Posts
    2,287
    Quote Originally Posted by NSXType-R View Post
    I don't think Honda is doing that great either. But none of them are doing well.
    explain.
    Buddy: 1998-2009
    Mah boi, UCP is what all true warriors strive for!
    PINGAS!!!!

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    501
    Toyota's problem for the future is that until now their whole gameplan was to just stay ahead of the Big 3.......which wasn't very hard up until a few years ago. But now that's changing, and their complacency could cost them big in the times to come. Reliability aside, they are going to start suffering more if they don't find a way to remove the "driving appliance" label from most of their car lineup. I honestly think the only thing holding them up from a bigger tumble right now is their reputation amongst the auto consumer population. But that will only hold up so long.
    "Wise man say: Forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza."

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    East Coast of the United States
    Posts
    12,007
    Quote Originally Posted by cargirl1990 View Post
    explain.
    I don't know specifics, but Honda dropped in sales a bit, just like Toyota did.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Really useful performance listings...
    By Egg Nog in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 04-18-2021, 05:13 PM
  2. GT4 whole car list!!!!
    By Mustang in forum Gaming
    Replies: 247
    Last Post: 07-07-2010, 08:06 AM
  3. Ford S-Max
    By Colin17 in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-01-2010, 04:00 AM
  4. Ford Mondeo Concept 2007
    By Vaigra in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-05-2006, 12:57 AM
  5. Ford Mustang (5th gen) Shelby GT 2007-
    By Matt in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-16-2006, 06:02 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •