Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 34

Thread: Porsche Boxster Spyder

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Scotland, UK
    Posts
    1,163

    Porsche Boxster Spyder

    FACTS
    • 0-62mph: 4.8sec
    • 316bhp 3.4-litre flat-six engine (10bhp up on the Boxster S)
    • 1275kg (not specified if dry or kerb)
    • 45,000
    • PDK option
    • Built to order, limited-run special edition
    • Unveiling at the Los Angeles motor show in December, with sales following in February 2010


    EVO ARTICLE
    A legendary name from Porsche’s back catalogue is back. Say hello to the Boxster Spyder, a modern day incarnation of the firm’s speedster body-style.

    Porsche is keen to big up the car’s lightweight characteristics, the Spyder dropping 80kg from the conventional Boxster S roadster it’s based on. At 1275kg, though, it still weighs more than twice that of its distant 550 Spyder ancestor.

    It’s the lightest current Porsche on sale, however, and with a 316bhp 3.4-litre flat-six engine (10bhp up on the Boxster S) sitting in the middle it should be plenty quick enough. It does the 0-62mph dash in 4.8sec, nearly half a second quicker than the S, and hits 166mph.

    The latter’s only with the roof off, mind. We wouldn’t advise trying it with the canvas top on, as even Porsche comes close to admitting it’s a bit of a token effort. They say, for instance, that the Spyder ‘has been developed first and foremost for driving in the open air’. Looking closely at the roof-up picture, it certainly doesn’t look the most snug or secure solution to sealing a car.

    As well as the obvious, there are further tweaks to distance the Spyder from its Boxster siblings, including sharper sports suspension to suit its more purist attitude.

    The Porsche Boxster Spyder will be unveiled at the Los Angeles motor show in December, with sales following in February 2010. Expect a UK price of around 45,000, with the company’s PDK twin-clutch gearbox on the options list. The Spyder is not a limited-run special edition, but will be built to order, Porsche anticipating low production numbers to reflect the car’s specialist nature.
    EVO - Porsche Boxster Spyder

    YOUTUBE TEASER
    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPgC5_03n_U"]YouTube - Constrained?[/ame]

    MY OPINION
    Yet another pointless special edition that will sell like a hotcake. Unfortunately Porsche in 30 years will use this Spyder as the "inspiration" for a future Spyder version of the then contemporary Porsches...
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by lightweight; 11-04-2009 at 06:36 PM. Reason: Added Content
    Minimising losses can maximise net gains

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    brisbane - sub-tropical land of mangoes
    Posts
    16,252
    has the same problem as the 911 cabriolet now.


    looks like a beached humpback whale.
    Andreas Preuninger, Manager of Porsche High Performance Cars: "Grandmas can use paddles. They aren't challenging."

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Calgary AB
    Posts
    1,580
    Great classic tainted by stupid special edition

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,416
    The name is a bit stupid. But as a concept it is interesting and the weight figure isn't too bad either.
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Auckland, NZ
    Posts
    1,191
    The roof looks like a tarpaulin tent.
    www.flickr.com/photos/maestro_ng

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    1,331
    Waaaaant. Want baaaaad.
    "The Metric System is the tool of the Devil! My car gets 40 Rods to the Hogshead and that's the ways I likes it!" -Grandpa Simpson

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Way Down South
    Posts
    2,709
    Quote Originally Posted by clutch-monkey View Post
    has the same problem as the 911 cabriolet now. looks like a beached humpback whale.
    Agreed. Too many fussy details to be considered attractive. Why not style the car with less, keeping to the design
    brief of the original 356 Speedster? Remove another 250kilos while doing so...

    And really, the "top" is laughable. Might as well use side curtains, too.
    '62 356S Notchback Hotrod
    '64 VW Microbus 21 Deluxe
    '67 911S Das Geburtstagsgeschenk
    '68 911T Targa Sporto
    '68 Mercedes 280 SL
    '62 BMW 700 Sport
    '63 BMW 700 Cabriolet
    '72 BMW 3.0CSL
    '72 BMW 3.0CSA
    '70 914/6 GT

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,486
    Boxter-Spyder? But I thought the Boxter-Boxter was already a spyder.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Near the middle of the middle of middle England.
    Posts
    370
    I think it looks okay. But then again it's a Boxster...
    Buying a car and not driving it is like buying a meal and not eating it.

    "Oh sh*t, we're going..25!!" - A dear friend of mine.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,416
    1275kg is the kerb weight. By comparison standard Boxster S is 1335kg.
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Scotland, UK
    Posts
    1,163
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrer View Post
    1275kg is the kerb weight. By comparison standard Boxster S is 1335kg.
    So the difference more or less stems from the ditching of the roof mechanism...

    Racing engineering at its finest
    Minimising losses can maximise net gains

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    33,416
    Quote Originally Posted by lightweight View Post
    So the difference more or less stems from the ditching of the roof mechanism...

    Racing engineering at its finest
    Some savings are also made by removing the radio, the climate control and having aluminium doors.
    Lack of charisma can be fatal.
    Visca Catalunya!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    5,458
    2800lb isn't bad....but really they didn't lose too much weight....

    Looks ok though, I do find it look better than normal Boxster....
    University of Toronto Formula SAE Alumni 2003-2007
    Formula Student Championship 2003, 2005, 2006
    www.fsae.utoronto.ca

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Scotland, UK
    Posts
    1,163
    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NReyG8X3kfg"]YouTube- Unleashed. The new Boxster Spyder.[/ame]

    Just In
    Minimising losses can maximise net gains

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    1,331
    Quote Originally Posted by csl177 View Post
    Might as well use side curtains, too.
    That'd be awesome!

    I'm so confused: everyone is always bitching about weight (me included) and how much they hate the Cayenne and Porsche's recent cars and (half of you) complain about the engine being in the rear, and when Porsche launches a lighter, sportier mid-engine car all everyone does is crap on it. Am I really the only one who's doing to defend this car?

    PS: I'm having fantasies of Porsche doing this with a 911.
    "The Metric System is the tool of the Devil! My car gets 40 Rods to the Hogshead and that's the ways I likes it!" -Grandpa Simpson

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. all cars all years 0-60 and 1/4mile time
    By matheus in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 51
    Last Post: 04-26-2015, 06:29 PM
  2. Gran Turismo 5
    By Sauc3 in forum Gaming
    Replies: 1020
    Last Post: 05-19-2014, 03:16 PM
  3. Really useful performance listings...
    By Egg Nog in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 06-20-2013, 10:45 PM
  4. Hide-Out Index
    By Sauc3 in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 06-20-2008, 02:43 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •