Originally Posted by
cls12vg30
if it doesn't, and your government gets out of control, there's not much you're going to be able to do about it anyway.
'course there is.
First we can vote them out.
Second we can apply passive resistance.
Finally, we can withdraw labour and payments.
In todays world ANY government needs production to continue operating.
The days of sitting on piles of gold/oil/etc to 'live-off' are long gone !!
Note that in all of these it is hard for a government to respond to a populace.
However, if you take arms it's easy, they can use the excuse of 'justice' to quell any rebellion.
AS I said, think it through for 10 minutes and you'll realise that armed uprising against the government won't work
A gun is a tool, nothing more. It has no mind of its own.
So is a nuclear stockpile, but you're not allowed to hold one of those
Criminals have proven themselves able to get guns, drugs, and whatever else they want no matter what laws are made. And criminals being the only people with guns is unacceptable.
But easier to police and punish.
If nobody is permitted a gun then arresting anyone with a gun and punishing them is NOT debatable. As long as you can legally hold a gun an officer has to have "reasoble doubt" to stop a person.
Governments being the only ones with guns is even more unacceptable. Over the past 100 years governments have proven themselves to be even less trustworthy with that kind of power than criminals.
Fascists and dicators and 'war-lords' with guns, ffo rsure.
But I've not heard any problems with the Swiss, or Swedes, Brits, Autralians, or etc etc You realise you can list MORE countries who've NOT had problems ( since the founding of the United Nations ) than the other.
"A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'