View Poll Results: What will your choice be?

Voters
45. You may not vote on this poll
  • The Petrol V8

    22 48.89%
  • The Diesel unit

    23 51.11%
Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 103

Thread: Petrol Vs Diesel

  1. #46
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328
    Originally posted by fpv_gtho
    it can depend. it could vary between bugger all to the sound of a beehive
    I would prefer the bugger all sound, whatever that is. Anyway, if I want to hear engine sounds the diesel gives you more, but strangely enough uninformed passengers in my car always have difficulties in accepting that it's a diesel they are (not) hearing.
    On another note why are people fitting out cars with these very expensive sound systems which make it impossible to hear engine noises anyway especially when they turn op the bass in such a manner that you can hear them coming from miles away.

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    ACT,Canberra Australia
    Posts
    6,086
    Originally posted by Egg Nog
    Yes, I realised what you said, but typically you should try to give some reasons why you say it.

    You don't like the idea of hydrogen-powered or alternative fuel cars. Why?
    Well the system has been reasoonbly unsecsessful in its testing fromlasti heard (i dont follow it hardly at all)ive heard stories about the possible explosions that could occur when the cars crash (wether their true or not is another matter) and just a general disturst for the idea.

  3. #48
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,772
    Originally posted by Falcon500
    Well the system has been reasoonbly unsecsessful in its testing fromlasti heard (i dont follow it hardly at all)ive heard stories about the possible explosions that could occur when the cars crash (wether their true or not is another matter) and just a general disturst for the idea.
    1. When Nickolaus Otto invented the first four-stroke Internal Combustion Engine, he got it right the first time. Good thing too, because otherwise he would've given up.

    2. For some reason people worry about hydrogen exploding people its a flammable substance. Oh wait a second, so is gasoline... the risks are very similar to those "risks" that we take driving around every day.

    Also, Hydrogen dissipates much faster than gasoline (and isn't environmentally harmful), so in the event of a spill hydrogen is remarkeably more safe.

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    1,336
    Also, Hydrogen dissipates much faster than gasoline (and isn't environmentally harmful), so in the event of a spill hydrogen is remarkeably more safe.
    i was reading about a test one proposed hydrogen fuel tanks and they took a full one and shot a high velocity incinidary round at it and after the initial explosion of impact and slight combustion the gas escaped so quickly it put itself out and dissipated into the atmosphere befor any serious damage. correct me if im wrong but hydrogen is less dense than helium at one atmosphere
    UCP's Most Hardcore Burro!

    Being human explains everything but excuses nothing

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,772
    Originally posted by megotmea7
    i was reading about a test one proposed hydrogen fuel tanks and they took a full one and shot a high velocity incinidary round at it and after the initial explosion of impact and slight combustion the gas escaped so quickly it put itself out and dissipated into the atmosphere befor any serious damage. correct me if im wrong but hydrogen is less dense than helium at one atmosphere
    Yes, hydrogen is the least dense of all known elements. I beleive helium is about .6 the density of air, while hydrogen is about .2 or .3

    Anyhow, thank for backing me up here.

    EDIT: I am a stupid chemist Read below if you want some decent information. Mine were estimates, and they were wrong. Thanks fvp_gtho

  6. #51
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    well to give a clue about the density of hydrogen, helium and oxygen, theyre atomic weights are 1, 4 and 16 respectively, although i dont know what "air" would be................

  7. #52
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Hammy
    Posts
    46
    i dont think "air" is a scientific element lol
    Dont Drink and Drive home Drift and Slide Home

  8. #53
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    yeah, air like sea water, is something u can only be sure whats in it by testing all of it
    I am the Stig

  9. #54
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    St Marys Western Sydney
    Posts
    20,953
    to give an indication, air is about 21% oxygen and 78% nitrogen
    I am the Stig

  10. #55
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    India
    Posts
    8

    Petrol Obviously

    Petrol Enignes are any day better because cars fly with petrol instantly no matter what the power , displacement or torque of the car. But, Diesel Engines need a very high performance units and also high performance diesel and still lag behind petrol cars atleast in terms of acceleration and smoothness but, in the long run Diesel proves to take the car to a higher top speed.

  11. #56
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,772
    Quote Originally Posted by ravi_mody
    Petrol Enignes are any day better because cars fly with petrol instantly no matter what the power , displacement or torque of the car. But, Diesel Engines need a very high performance units and also high performance diesel and still lag behind petrol cars atleast in terms of acceleration and smoothness but, in the long run Diesel proves to take the car to a higher top speed.
    What?!??

    That was basically the most illogical string of facts ever. Can you try to explain exactly what you mean?

  12. #57
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    75
    Same here, i didnt get what you ment, so whats better (from your point of view)?

    Personally i am not going to lay forward my opinion, first im gonna have to do more research into Disel engines.
    “Nothin like da feelin of da pedal 2 da metal”

  13. #58
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    9,465
    My friends parents own a 98 Ford Mondeo Turbo Diesel 1.8, and actually has much less engine noise than my mums 96 petrol Toyota Corona, isn't smoky, and altho having a classic diesel sound, it does sound very refined and actually quite nice! They also have a 86 Ford Falcon LPG, and thats, err, bit noisy...

  14. #59
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328
    Quote Originally Posted by Spastik_Roach
    My friends parents own a 98 Ford Mondeo Turbo Diesel 1.8, and actually has much less engine noise than my mums 96 petrol Toyota Corona, isn't smoky, and altho having a classic diesel sound, it does sound very refined and actually quite nice! They also have a 86 Ford Falcon LPG, and thats, err, bit noisy...
    And you have to realise that the 1998 mondeo is still a conventional turbo diesel, so no common rail system, which turns every diesel into a pussycat.

  15. #60
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    9,465
    You need to make your sig "UCP's Most Hardcore Diesel Fanboy"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Woah! Fast/Smoggy Ford F-350 Diesel!
    By Egg Nog in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 12-28-2003, 02:40 AM
  2. discovery series 3
    By motorhead in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 06-12-2003, 07:31 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •