Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 46 to 48 of 48

Thread: NASCAR Driving Techniques Exposed

  1. #46
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    NJ/Florida
    Posts
    355
    oval racing may very well be difficult but put one of those guys in an f1 car and see what happens, it would be like when hammond tried it on TG
    -Fundamentals are a crutch for the talentless.

    -I thought the blacks in Baltimore were bad, shit, they’re nothing compared to these fags you got here in San Francisco…haha.

    -Kenny Powers

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    95616
    Posts
    5,357
    Quote Originally Posted by jump15vc View Post
    oval racing may very well be difficult but put one of those guys in an f1 car and see what happens, it would be like when hammond tried it on TG
    Jeff's Formula One Detour

    Jeff Gordon tried Montoya's BMW F1 car a few years ago and did pretty well.
    I'm dropping out to create a company that starts with motorcycles, then cars, and forty years later signs a legendary Brazilian driver who has a public and expensive feud with his French teammate.

  3. #48
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,508
    Quote Originally Posted by jump15vc View Post
    oval racing may very well be difficult but put one of those guys in an f1 car and see what happens, it would be like when hammond tried it on TG
    It would be a new experience. Things happen faster in an F1 car and the physical demands are higher. That does somewhat shift what the driver needs to be able to handle. In Nascar you see many older drivers because the game is more mental or at least the physical demands are lower. That simply means that more drivers who are mentally and skill wise capable of the challenge can compete. Now we could say that the lack of physical capabilities is a reason why F1 drivers are "better" than NASCAR. I believe there is some truth to that but be careful with that line of reasoning. We could potentially design cars that on some tracks would cause drivers to simply pass out. At that point the "winning" driver would be decided almost exclusively by being the last driver not to pass out. It would be a test of stamina only. Furthermore, the addition of say a G-suit might alter the outcome.

    I also suspect that if we were to look back at previous Grand Prix and Indy winners over the decades we might find that when speeds were lower at least some of what made a winning driver was different. When the physical demands were lower was the average age of a Grand Prix driver older than today? Of course in the old days with less safety in the cars and tracks you likely needed a different mind set.

    Anyway, in the end I think we can conclude that F1 and Nascar are two different types of driving (both in terms of the cars and the typical circuit). As such, the skills needed to be tops in each while similar are not identical and success in one would not guarantee success in the other.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 20
    Last Post: 01-05-2008, 02:55 AM
  2. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-06-2006, 07:39 AM
  3. If you hated Speed TV before
    By CSL in forum Racing forums
    Replies: 80
    Last Post: 01-23-2006, 11:10 AM
  4. Driving techniques
    By Cedric in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 06-21-2003, 01:29 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •