So, you are saying that he has to buy an SUV because he can't fit in a car, but he has a car that he comfortably fits in.Originally Posted by rev440
So if he has a car that he fits in, he doesn't "need" an SUV for that reason.
It wasn't as if he had no other option and he was forced into SUV ownership.
Originally Posted by rev440Do you think a Focus is equivalent to an Expedition?Originally Posted by me
Not at all.Originally Posted by Geneticfreak
If people in Scandanavia had a genuine need for these vehicles, companies such as Volvo and Saab would have been building affordable SUVs for many decades to fulfill that need.
They don't because there is no "need".
If you slide off the road?Originally Posted by Geneticfreak
Just because you don't drive on the track, it doesn't mean other people don't.Originally Posted by Geneticfreak
Funnily enough having a fast car is somewhat of an advantage.
Why not indeed?Originally Posted by Geneticfreak
Why mask the genuine reasons for buying one with all this "I'm big and it snows and I need to tow stuff" crap that are the usual arguments people bring up?
The actual phrase you are looking for is:Originally Posted by Geneticfreak
"Jack of all trades, master of none"
Oddly enough, no one builds sports cars that heavy because its a stupid idea...Originally Posted by Geneticfreak
A sports car with 1/2 the power and 1/3 the weight will easily run circles round it all day long though...
An SUV that weighed as much as a sports car, that would be a good idea.