Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 42 of 42

Thread: Most Important supercar ever

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Coldenflat
    Posts
    4,557
    Quote Originally Posted by Fleet 500
    In general, back then, "Super Cars" were those that ran the 1/4 mile in the 13-second bracket or better.
    So a 1970 Camaro RS SS 396 was a supercar, or very very close? Sounds kind of wierd to me.
    "I'd hate to die twice. It's so boring" - Richard Feynman, last recorded words.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    San Fernando Valley, Calif.
    Posts
    6,794
    Quote Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine
    I think that's the US usage of the term.

    For the rest it's MUCH MUCH more than just performance, hence the Miura becomes one of the first listed
    Yes, it definitely is a U.S. term.
    '76 Cadillac Fleetwood Seventy-Five Limousine, '95 Lincoln Town Car.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    San Fernando Valley, Calif.
    Posts
    6,794
    Quote Originally Posted by CdocZ
    So a 1970 Camaro RS SS 396 was a supercar, or very very close? Sounds kind of wierd to me.
    That would probably be classifed as a muscle car, but as you said, very very close because with low enough gears (numerically high), they would run low-14s/high 13s with no modifications.
    The Super Cars were the top guns from each car make- the 454 Chevelles, 427 Fairlanes, 428 Mustangs, 427 Yenko Camaros, Hemicudas, 440-6 packs '69 Road Runners, '70 Buick GSX 455 Stage 1s, Olds 455 4-4-2s, Pontiac 455 SD Trans Ams...
    All of these could run well into the 13s, some could run in the 12s.
    '76 Cadillac Fleetwood Seventy-Five Limousine, '95 Lincoln Town Car.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Purdue, Indiana
    Posts
    1,499
    I'd say that the Muira would be the most important supercar for being the first mid-engine supercar (I think).

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    2,452
    Quote Originally Posted by aNOBLEman
    I'd say that the Muira would be the most important supercar for being the first mid-engine supercar (I think).
    I agree by saying the Muira was the most important supercar, it was a massive step forward in the evolution of sports cars. One thing special about the car is it's 60 degree transversely mounted engine. That is what helped make the car special in it's day.
    My Photography: flickr.com/photos/a-m-photo/
    "The best way to predict the future is to invent it."

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Detroit
    Posts
    2,176
    I would kinda say the Vector, because it was proof that America had more up it's sleeve that slow, uygly useless gasguzzlers, and bad haircuts. (-JC)
    I have found a new love in the form of a tristar.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,037
    Quote Originally Posted by aNOBLEman
    I'd say that the Muira would be the most important supercar for being the first mid-engine supercar (I think).
    did you read the other posts before yours?
    Audi humbles Porsche. A new dawn starts today.

    Being nice since 2007.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    486
    Nay, it is the FIAT Itala (1904).
    10 litres of fun put in 4 cylinders =50bhp.
    The other most powerful cars had 20bhp or less.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Elswick, England (Home of the world famous Bonds' Ice Cream!)
    Posts
    442
    Quote Originally Posted by Vaigra
    The Miura..for being the first mid-engined supercar...if i remember correctly lol
    I'll agree with that. Every supercar that's been created is brilliant (well nearly all anyway) but there's only a few that have been important. The Miura was a revolution in supercar building.
    UCP's No.1 Koenigsegg & Aston Martin fan!
    UCP's Biggest Feeder fan!

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    San Fernando Valley, Calif.
    Posts
    6,794
    Quote Originally Posted by Prius
    I would kinda say the Vector, because it was proof that America had more up it's sleeve that slow, uygly useless gasguzzlers, and bad haircuts. (-JC)
    What were the "slow, ugly, useless gas guzzlers?"
    '76 Cadillac Fleetwood Seventy-Five Limousine, '95 Lincoln Town Car.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Purdue, Indiana
    Posts
    1,499
    Quote Originally Posted by Prius
    I would kinda say the Vector, because it was proof that America had more up it's sleeve that slow, uygly useless gasguzzlers, and bad haircuts. (-JC)
    If you say that then I say the S7TT because it's American and it's WAY better than any Vector...and more reliable.

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Detroit
    Posts
    2,176
    Quote Originally Posted by Fleet 500
    What were the "slow, ugly, useless gas guzzlers?"
    what the big three specilized in, while america was rolling out SUVS and mundane, slow sedans, someone mixed it up and accually made a fast american car.
    I have found a new love in the form of a tristar.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Australia builds a sub 4 second supercar
    By fpv_gtho in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 10-31-2006, 01:40 AM
  2. What makes a supercar a supercar?
    By botomfeeder in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 89
    Last Post: 06-11-2006, 07:34 PM
  3. 2005 Australian V8 Supercar Championship News and Preview
    By motorsportnerd in forum Racing forums
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-11-2005, 07:57 PM
  4. Replies: 53
    Last Post: 06-14-2004, 10:52 PM
  5. V8 Supercar Championship Round 4 - Hidden Valley
    By motorsportnerd in forum Racing forums
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 05-29-2004, 03:03 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •