Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23

Thread: What my ultimate supercar would be like

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    258

    What my ultimate supercar would be like

    Briefly:

    1. The driver would be seated in the centre, head positioned exactly in the middle of the wheelbase and body positioned exactly along the centreline of the car (a la McLaren F1). There could be two seats aft of the driver as well.

    2. The car would be mid-engined of course, with a longitudanal 7 spd DSG gearbox taking drive directly to the rear wheels. The engine and gearbox would be, racecar-style, part of the supporting structure.

    3. Speaking of the engine, I'd like a 6.0 V12 with roundabout 670bhp, without any forced induction please. This way it would have a specific output of more than 110 bhp/ litre, which is pretty snazzy I'd say. Being a BMW fan, I'd like it to have an M5 V10 with 2 extra cylinders grafted on somehow and just ever-so-slightly tuned to kick out a bit more.

    4. The entire car's structure will be constructed of Carbon-Kevlar, Carbon-Reinforced-Plastic, Titanium and Magnesium. It would naturally also have a honey-comb-mesh tub as well. Brakes would be Carbon-ceramic units with optional ABS assistance.

    5. The car would have adaptive aerodynamics (only the bare minimum), giving you more when cornering and less when straight-lining. A huge diffuser would ensure stability at high speeds.

    6. Weight must be kept down, with a target of less than 1050 Kg. This would give you about 0,5KW/ Kg, which would put a smile on anyone's face I think.

    7. The looks of the car has to be form following function. No unneeded bits of bodywork here.

    8. Concerning extras, achieving the targeted weight would eliminate fancies like air-con, ICE etc., but I'd like some air-con in their nevertheless. No need for expensive audio equipment, the engine would provide all the music I need!

    9. Lastly, all my dreamcar would need is an extremely twisty and deserted road...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    258
    Wow, sorry, thought I was posting this in the Supercar-related forum...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    5,606
    More or less same thing, it is technical anyway.
    "The thunder of 1001bhp would send a sonic boom through his carbon fibre shell, crack it in half and leave a wet puddle on the fancy leather seat."

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Rice, Virginia
    Posts
    1,870
    Quote Originally Posted by dcsbeemer
    The engine and gearbox would be, racecar-style, part of the supporting structure.
    dont burn up the clutch...well, im sure with the DSG gearbox it wouldnt be a problem, but if it were standard....woo
    pondering things

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    USA+CH
    Posts
    1,412
    yes....if only there was a lightweight carbon-chassis car with a V12 and central seating

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    258
    Yeah, I know my description sounds an awful lot like a Mac F1, but that car is consigned to history...

    Besides, the cornering Gs of the Mac wasn't that much impressive, imagine how incredible that car would've been being capable of atleast 1.1 Gs through the twisties!

    Also, even with a shortcoming here and there, the Mac is widely regarded as (still) being the best supercar ever built. Why deviate from a winning recipe? Use it, improve where you can, leave the rest as is.

    And why not a V12? It's smooth, is a classic supercar engine, and it sounds incredible! We could probably go for a forced-induction V8, but that's not special enough... Of all the great supercars that have forced-induction (except maybe the latest gen ones), I've almost always read that the designers would've opted for a larger capacity naturally-aspirated V12. This must be for a reason don't you think? And why no larger than 6.0? Simply because I believe anything larger would result in too much of a weight-penalty, inhibating dynamic ability. Witness the continuesly postponed release of the Veyron for proof of that...

    Unless you think that 670bhp isn't enough. For me, that's plenty, and I fail to see the use of anything more powerful. Beyond a certain amount of power (not saying it's precisely 670bhp), you'll need all these woosy electronic driving aids. In most cases, this isn't only needed to compensate for the driver's inability to control the power, but also from keeping the car's drivetrain from tearing itself into little metallic pieces.

    So yes, maybe I've just described what a modern Mac F1 would be like. Shoot me for basing my dreamcar on one of the greatest ever.

    If anyone thinks they can do so much better, why don't you enlighten me with your thoughts?

    Friendly challenge

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Northern New Jersey
    Posts
    16,602
    I don't need much for my dream car, basically it would consist of a 1992 Honda Civic EX, some primer, fiberglass bodykits, white and red paint for the type R look, and a few stickers.
    Rockefella says:
    pat's sister is hawt
    David Fiset says:
    so is mine
    David Fiset says:
    do want

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Sydney, Down Under
    Posts
    8,833
    Quote Originally Posted by Rockefella
    I don't need much for my dream car, basically it would consist of a 1992 Honda Civic EX, some primer, fiberglass bodykits, white and red paint for the type R look, and a few stickers.
    *cough*rice*cough*

    you should look at the australian Joss supercar

    http://www.joss.com.au/joss.html

    Aerodynamic body, 950kgs, bout 500hp outta a big arse V8
    Faster, faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death...
    – Hunter Thompson

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    258
    Oh yeah, that Joss is impressive! Not crazy about the engine though, but very nice!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Sydney, Down Under
    Posts
    8,833
    it may not be advanced but it punches hard and sounds great, its the aussie coming through
    Faster, faster, faster, until the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death...
    – Hunter Thompson

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Ozland
    Posts
    912
    Why a big arsed V12?
    Those things are damn heavy, and it would have to be mounted right behind the driver, and other things like the fuel tank would need to be placed say...under the bonnet for optimal weight distribution.
    A big part of the handling you desire is getting the car balanced, a huge lump of metal in an otherwise extremely lightweight chassis is the antithesis of balance.

    You can emulate the power and even torque curve of your V12 in a much smaller and lighter FI engine.

    Why is a V12 special anyhow?? almost all supercars run them these days, do something different.
    Last edited by P4g4nite; 07-22-2005 at 08:12 AM.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Quote Originally Posted by P4g4nite
    under the bonnet for optimal weight distribution.
    Which then makes pushing the car more difficult as the front corner weights change as the fuel level drops

    Matra had the "right" idea (!).
    They put the fuel tank over the mid-engine so the impact on corner weigth was almost equal. 'course it meant you NEVER wanted to think about a crash or an engine fire
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Ozland
    Posts
    912
    I was being slightly sarcastic about the under bonnet thing although..
    Some race cars have twin fuel cells, front and rear, so the weight balance stays the same as they empty.

    The point is that if you have a huge engine you need to make some big allowances to get the weight sorted out right.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Quote Originally Posted by P4g4nite
    IThe point is that if you have a huge engine you need to make some big allowances to get the weight sorted out right.
    Not so much if it's mid.
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,772
    The car you describe is pretty much just a McLaren F1 LM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Australia builds a sub 4 second supercar
    By fpv_gtho in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 10-31-2006, 01:40 AM
  2. Logistics behind Chinese V8 Supercar round
    By fpv_gtho in forum Racing forums
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-31-2005, 06:32 PM
  3. Brabus Ultimate 101
    By DarkPhenix in forum Multimedia
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-07-2005, 08:28 AM
  4. Ultimate budget supercar
    By VtecMini in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-19-2004, 09:16 PM
  5. Ultimate Supercar Comparison!
    By werty in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 04-07-2004, 12:51 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •