View Poll Results: SL 65 AMG or SLR McLaren?

Voters
52. You may not vote on this poll
  • Mercedes SL 65 AMG

    16 30.77%
  • Mercedes SLR McLaren

    36 69.23%
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 35 of 35

Thread: Mercedes SL65AMG vs. Mercedes SLR McLaren

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,190
    The SLR. At last I can buy an ultracar that won't piss me off. I can ride in comfort to an epic soundtrack and know that I have got that engineering to assure me that it will start on a cold morning and get me there with no hesitations.
    On a Good day, Chris Bangle designs the Fiat Coupe.
    On a Bad day, he designs a BMW.

    R.I.P Richard Burns.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    7,272
    If you are talking about price try looking at it from another perspective:

    The SL65 is probably more than 75% the same as an SL350. The only differences are the engine, gearbox and a few anciliaries.

    Yet it costs £85,000 more than the SL350, £50,000 more than the SL55 even.

    Talk about a rip off!

    With the SLR you get a car that is largely unique, apart from the engine and gearbox.
    Most of the other major componentry is unique to the SLR, including things like lubricants and tyres.
    Thanks for all the fish

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,266
    Quote Originally Posted by Coventrysucks
    If you are talking about price try looking at it from another perspective:

    The SL65 is probably more than 75% the same as an SL350. The only differences are the engine, gearbox and a few anciliaries.

    Yet it costs £85,000 more than the SL350, £50,000 more than the SL55 even.

    Talk about a rip off!

    With the SLR you get a car that is largely unique, apart from the engine and gearbox.
    Most of the other major componentry is unique to the SLR, including things like lubricants and tyres.
    you make a good argument there, but the thing is, how often are you going to push the slr to the limits ?? seriously

    the sl65 is plenty fast for the road, as is the 55

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    TUJUNGA, CALIFORNIA U.S of A.
    Posts
    4,208
    ill go for Mercedes SL 65 AMG for $179,000, im pretty sure it drives nice and fast,as far as $455 vs SLR??! no thinks..
    Some Rulers Are Immortalized In Marble Others,
    In Carbon Fiber.{Hard Core Audi Fan}Ich Fahr Omnibus!
    """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    258
    AND THE WINNER IS... THE SLR!

    With 31 votes to 13 (at the time of writing), the SLR comprehensively beats it's cheaper brother.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Mercedes McLaren P8
    By bum-man in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 10-16-2008, 09:27 AM
  2. Mercedes-Benz SLR Mclaren vs Ford GT
    By McLareN in forum Car comparison
    Replies: 111
    Last Post: 03-22-2007, 02:08 PM
  3. Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren
    By John in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 102
    Last Post: 11-11-2005, 01:05 PM
  4. Ferrari Enzo or Mercedes Mclaren SLR?
    By FerrariMad in forum Car comparison
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 04-07-2005, 02:01 AM
  5. Replies: 31
    Last Post: 09-07-2004, 03:36 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •