GT40, 06'Zo6 Vette and the 06' SR/T viper

[mattmacklind]

In fantasy land, I would go for the Ford GT, I think its great looking and the perfomance is pretty incredible. The Vette, for the money, and only in this regard, is more impressive. Kudos to GM for getting the Vette right, its been like 20 years. I think the new Vette, even in "regular stock". is a great car all around.

[Lets Gekiga In]

You guys are nuts taking a Corvette over the Ford GT.

Just nuts.

[pAinTrAin]

You guys are nuts taking a Corvette over the Ford GT.

Just nuts.

But the title says GT 40 so doesn't that mean the Ford form the 60's?

[Falcon500]

Well its actually good when they refer to the new gt as the gt40 in australia a GT is a falcon GT it adds more definition to what is actually being said just as a though.

And while i like all the cars mentioned my moneys on the gt (40)

[teatako]

if only the ´vette was mid engined, id take it
if only the GT didnt share engine with F-trucks, id take it
if i liked the viper, id tke it

[pAinTrAin]

if only the ´vette was mid engined, id take it
if only the GT didnt share engine with F-trucks, id take it
if i liked the viper, id tke it

So what do you like??

[teatako]

i kind of like the GT, i love the z06; theyre certainly my favorite american cars; theyre just not my absolute favourite. i like the lotus 7 replicas; i like the cobra. the ariel atom.the caparo t1 is a wet dream to me. i like small light roadsters, preferably mid-engined. i drive a smart roadster. i actually like a lot of cars. but those three the viper, the vette and GT cost way too much money and use too much space and fuel to my taste, and theres no reason i cant have fun in something smaller.ive yet to try a front engined roadster though.ive only tried a 350z. i have the theory that a front engined car creates a bit more understeer and you cant make it spin around its midpoint as u can with a mid engined car