SLR SL 65 AMG
V8 < V12
5.5 Liter < 6.0 Liter
617 HP |13 hp is nothing| 604 HP
575 lb-ft Torque < 738 lb-ft Torque
ok 13 hp is nothing so i still think sl 65 amg better discuss
SLR SL 65 AMG
V8 < V12
5.5 Liter < 6.0 Liter
617 HP |13 hp is nothing| 604 HP
575 lb-ft Torque < 738 lb-ft Torque
ok 13 hp is nothing so i still think sl 65 amg better discuss
depends. i like the mclarens looks better, looks sharper and more aggresive. the sl65......its sharp, but it just doesnt have that "supercar fee" when you see it
"I'd hate to die twice. It's so boring" - Richard Feynman, last recorded words.
the SLR weighs much less, at 3897.6lbs, than the 4564 of the sl65 amg
i have to say i like the SLR more. The SLR is also alot faster than the SL6r at 0-60. The SLR does it in 3.8 seconds and the SL 65 does it in 4.1 seconds
My Photography: flickr.com/photos/a-m-photo/
"The best way to predict the future is to invent it."
also don't forget that the SL65 amg is limited to 155mph, while the SLR doesn't have one, and reaches 208mph
Last edited by Sweeney921; 02-08-2005 at 07:35 PM.
The Acura RSX type S is better than the Lotus Exige S2 because it has more power and a bigger displacement
i have seen both in person, each at a dealer and on the road, and the looks of the sl65 are very aggressive, but i must say the slr is up there with the 10 most gorgeous cars i have ever seen- the slr is stunningly beautiful and it sounds nice too
IF ANYBODY KNOWS ANY INFO REGARDING FERRARI ENZO SERIAL NUMBERS/ (COLORS IN) LOCATIONS/ ANYTHING AT ALL THAT IS RELATED TO THIS....PM ME WHAT YOU KNOW. THANKS
"The Ferrari is the girl you bring home to your parents. The Lamborghini is the wild slut you sleep with on the weekend." -Road & Track
brazilians are hot
same, slr just wins it. top 10? i wouldnt say that, but it is pretty nice looking. id take a zonda tho.Originally Posted by gbrown37
"I'd hate to die twice. It's so boring" - Richard Feynman, last recorded words.
And more weight! = more features = better car, duhOriginally Posted by Niko_Fx
Its not the size that counts, it is what you do with it.Originally Posted by omarsuperman
The SL65 has more torque, but more weight, and a more GT orientated set up.
The SLR is significantly lighter, much more firmly set up, and eclipses the SL65 completely in terms of performance.
The SL65 is basically a £60,000 SL350 with a different engine and gearbox, and more weight.
Does that justify the extra £85,000 on the price?
£85,000 for an ENGINE and GEARBOX?!
That is $160,000.
Rip off.
The SLR may look like a rip off at 2.2x the price of the SL65 but you get:
A carbon fibre monocoque chassis
carbon fibre body panels
chassis and handling set up by McLaren
bespoke carbon ceramic brakes
bespoke michelin tyres
bespoke Mobil 1 lubricants
etc, etc
The SLR, a comfey GT cruiser, is tenths slower than the Porsche Carrera GT - a full on race-derived supercar - the SL65 is seconds slower.
Thanks for all the fish
Ive heard the 65 handles like shat...
UPC's most heavy Bawls drinker. :D
Hahaha, you're right! It doesn't have that supercar fee does it? It's significantly cheaper than the SLR and much more suited to daily driving. The SLR is a supercar and isn't meant to be compared to the SL65 which is a GT. The SLR is my choice if you have the money, but with the comfort of the SL65, you would never need to buy a house.Originally Posted by CdocZ
The SLR is my favorite car, and the SL65 isnt
Seriously, imo the SLR is superior in every aspect but mostly because i love the design of the car and i dont care if it is slower than the Enzo or the Carrera GT, speed isnt so important, because if you think that a car is awesome only due to its top speed you must be really really stupid!
And some people think its ugly as hell but i guess that everyone deserves to have a different opinion so i dont blame them.
So boys and girls, the lesson is that everyone has the right to judge a car, because we all are free to have any opinion that we suport however we have to recognize that the SLR is a car with great potencial
Simple maths: SL55 is considered a better than the 65. If you consider the SL65 better than the SLR, than the SL55 is better the SLR.
Money can't buy you friends, but you do get a better class of enemy.
What makes you say that the 55 is better than the 65? I'm not saying it isn't, just explain why you say that...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)