Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 74

Thread: Best Front-Engine Car Ever

  1. #46
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,552
    Quote Originally Posted by nota
    ...
    In my book, pointing out anything is entirely 'acceptable' as long as it is true & accurate. And yes there are cars with engines entirely ahead of axle centreline
    Engine placed entirely ahead of the front axle is news to me, especially the longitudinally mounted Gregoire MetA mentioned, live and learn...

    As for FWD cars, the engine kinda straddles the axle-line, canted over it. Or do FF cars actually hang most of the engine mass in front of the axle centerline.

    What's a good source of engine placement? Road & Track magazine used to provide a outline drawing of the cars with their roadtests but lately have stopped doing it.
    "Racing improves the breed" ~Sochiro Honda

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Quote Originally Posted by PerfAdv
    As for FWD cars, the engine kinda straddles the axle-line, canted over it. Or do FF cars actually hang most of the engine mass in front of the axle centerline.
    "most" cant the engine backwards to got some of it over the diff.
    The general layout is engine , gearbox to one side and diff to rear of gearbox, thus putting the block in front of the axle line. Trygin to get it further back compromises the height and handling much more than the few inches of for-aft difference
    What's a good source of engine placement? Road & Track magazine used to provide a outline drawing of the cars with their roadtests but lately have stopped doing it.
    I know it's a bummer, I tried to find the QP
    Like you said car mags USED to do lots it but dont' see many now !!
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  3. #48
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,552
    Quote Originally Posted by Matra et Alpine
    Perf ? You sure the new Maser isn't' front-mid ?
    I can't find any pics of the engine bay BUT that transmission tunnel is HUGE so the 'box is obviously pushed way back which might suggest that it's front-mid.
    Quote Originally Posted by Automobile magazine
    Mounted far enough back in the engine bay for an equitable 47/53 percent front/rear weight distribution, it's mated to a six-speed sequential manual gearbox that has an automatic mode.
    I thought it might have been front-mid but couldn't find any evidence. As front-mid is so touted as a technologically advanced feature I figured they'd at least mention it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Matra
    It might just be that Maserati dont' feel the need to feed the fanboys with the "front-mid" hype knowing the car will sell itself
    Got any engine bay pics or cutaways ??
    There also is no mention of front-mid even on the Maserati site. It very well be that Maserati don't want to bring attention to this type to technical detail. Their website is very uninformative seemingly catering to the Art gallery/cocktail party set and not technical enthusiasts.

    Quote Originally Posted by Matra
    It's always possible to do other things to get weight distribution better - but usually at a cost. My A610 has the power steering and air con and battery located in the front wings beneath the headlights and the radiator and ECU in between -- with the ENGINE at the back. Got the weight issues of the GTA resolved BUT is a repair/maintenance nightmare !! ( one only the French would undertake )
    I remember reading when the last Camaro was redesigned the engine was stuffed as far back as possible and as a result changing the sparkplugs hidden under the dash required a special tool.
    "Racing improves the breed" ~Sochiro Honda

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    4,031
    Quote Originally Posted by Coventrysucks
    If people acknowledge that there is a very distinct difference between a "rear" engined car, and a "mid" engined car, where in both instances the engine is behind the driver, then why is there such resistance to accepting that the same distinct difference exists between "front" and "mid" where the engine is ahead of the driver?

    If you think that calling a front-mid engine layout "mid engined" too fussy and pedantic, surely all rear-mid layouts should strictly be refered to as "rear engined"?
    That's it, Coventry

    Likewise with Traction Avant example, whether 'frontal' or 'rearward' imo a mid is a mid is a mid. Apart from Talbo(t) another vehicle model that springs to mind might be the long-running Lotus Clubman. Under the Matra mantra earlier Clubmans are front engined - yet newer ones (of the same basic design) are now mid engined! This makes little sense

    So to those who keep insisting, I pose this question: exactly WHEN in did this transmogrification occur? (precise day not required, month/year will suffice)

    ps: as for my 'pedant' remark I was refering to self
    Last edited by nota; 01-20-2006 at 12:19 PM.

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328
    Quote Originally Posted by PerfAdv
    Engine placed entirely ahead of the front axle is news to me, especially the longitudinally mounted Gregoire MetA mentioned, live and learn...
    All Audi's are still built on this principle, and many French cars such as the Panhard, had it as well. Here is a pic of the Devin Panhard racer, (Laguna Seca 2005)
    Attached Images Attached Images
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  6. #51
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    California
    Posts
    3,552
    Quote Originally Posted by henk4
    All Audi's are still built on this principle, and many French cars such as the Panhard, had it as well. Here is a pic of the Devin Panhard racer, (Laguna Seca 2005)
    In modern Audis it isn't as apparent but visualizing how Quattro is setup, engine placement in front of the axle is a necessity.

    The Panhard's front overhanging placement is so extreme it reminds me of the Morgan Supersports. Not a good placement in even minor frontal crash, for engine health.
    "Racing improves the breed" ~Sochiro Honda

  7. #52
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328
    Quote Originally Posted by PerfAdv
    In modern Audis it isn't as apparent but visualizing how Quattro is setup, engine placement in front of the axle is a necessity.

    The Panhard's front overhanging placement is so extreme it reminds me of the Morgan Supersports. Not a good placement in even minor frontal crash, for engine health.
    no problem, these engines were air cooled

    and here is the Gregoire engine...
    Attached Images Attached Images
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  8. #53
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    4,031
    2cv ?

  9. #54
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rozenburg, Holland
    Posts
    27,328
    Quote Originally Posted by nota
    2cv ?
    Remember we disucssed the stick shift of the 2CV? It was there because the gearbox is in front on the engine....(Just like the R4 )
    "I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting, but it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously." Douglas Adams

  10. #55
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    95616
    Posts
    5,357
    at the risk of sounding like a fanboy, the Nissan Skyline GT-R is a good front engine car. Unfortunately, the weight is its weakness.
    I'm dropping out to create a company that starts with motorcycles, then cars, and forty years later signs a legendary Brazilian driver who has a public and expensive feud with his French teammate.

  11. #56
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Quote Originally Posted by nota
    Under the Matra mantra earlier Clubmans are front engined - yet newer ones (of the same basic design) are now mid engined! This makes little sense
    Correct because nothing has changed and any sensible reader would criucify a marketing release that made that suggestiong. Front is front. Front-mid is front to sell to the pseudo-techno-nerds who dont' knwo any better perhaps
    So to those who keep insisting, I pose this question: exactly WHEN in did this transmogrification occur? (precise day not required, month/year will suffice)
    I suggest it was when a marketing person was trygin to make a good sellign name for the excellent design idea ( possibly already implemetned by many others ) as something SPECIAL and saw the buyer as msot interested in mid-engine sportscars. Trying to woo them he/she wanted to use the "mid" word

    As said before etymology is fun but very seldom can you identify the first use. I suggest this one could be tracked down though if we track back those makers who needed to sell against Ferrari with their models
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  12. #57
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,654
    Shelby 427, AAR Cuda, 340 T/A Challanger, C5 Z06.
    UCP biggest mustang lover

  13. #58
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    United States of America
    Posts
    4,875
    I would choose the 575M SuperAmerica as my most-preferred.

    The Best is probably the SLR McLaren, but I'd take the Maranello.
    2007 Acura TL Type-S (AEM V2, R-V6 Race/J-Pipe, ATLP Quad Exhaust)
    2011 BMW 328i Coupe

  14. #59
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    3,560
    The Classic 900 and iirc earlier Saabs had a engine almost entirely ahead of the axles. Saab believed 60/40 weight distrubtion was better on the snow. If I mine ever sees snow I will report back on this.

    Of my favorites I thing the AM DB4 GT would have to be right at the top of the list.
    Chief of Secret Police and CFO - Brotherhood of Jelly
    No Mr. Craig, I expect you to die! On the inside. Of heartbreak. You emo bitch

  15. #60
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    UNI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Posts
    10,644
    Mk1
    Ford Escort Mk1
    Engine:
    2200cc 16v All Steel JRE (John Read Engines) Vauxhall XE
    Doug Kiddy Crank
    Arrows Rods
    JE Pistons
    Dry sumped
    Jenvey direct to head throttle bodys
    Motec management

    Producing: 282bhp | 206lb/ft

    Gearbox:
    Glebe 5 sp. dog box

    Axle:
    FFTT Atlas axle with alloy brace
    4.6:1 CWP. on Motor Sport LSD
    4link plus watts linkage

    Brakes:
    Front:
    315mm discs with Radial Mount AP Calipers
    Rear:
    300mm with Billet Wilwood Dynalite Calipers

    Suspension:
    Front:
    Adjustable Ride Height 300/70 "Short" Bilstein Struts
    "In Situ" Adjustable Track Control Arms
    "In Situ" Adjustable Compression Struts
    Anti Roll Bar
    Track Width is increased by 70mm
    Electric Power Assisted Steering coupled to a Tilton High Ratio steering rack
    Rear:
    Shocks are turreted Leda 2 way adjustable remote reservoir taking 2 1/4" diameter springs

    The body shell is the key to this car as every effort has been made to keep the mass of the car central, i.e. the engine and box has been moved back 14" to just behind the cross member. This has also allowed the the engine and box to be mounted lower in the shell.

    The fuel tank swirl pot punps and filters have all been mounted between the 4 link boxes and then covered with a custom alloy fire wall.

    Specification also includes custom alloy dash with SPA rev counter and an array of Racetech instruments, custom alloy switch console, alloy gear lever and gear knob, heated screen, poly carb windows, plus lots more, all parts new.









    Or Mk2 escort








Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Top 10 Worst Value Cars Ever
    By h00t_h00t in forum Car comparison
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 04-24-2008, 03:29 AM
  2. Mercedes-Benz SLR Mclaren vs Ford GT
    By McLareN in forum Car comparison
    Replies: 111
    Last Post: 03-22-2007, 02:08 PM
  3. Mercedes-Benz Bionic car concept 2005
    By drakkie in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-08-2005, 02:13 PM
  4. Oldsmobile Toronado of Jay Leno 1966
    By McLareN in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 12-27-2004, 07:30 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •