Australia's own supercar in the 60 What could that have been,
Are you serious it had Navigation
Do you know anything about it's engine?
Australia's own supercar in the 60 What could that have been,
Are you serious it had Navigation
Do you know anything about it's engine?
"Just a matter of time i suppose"
"The elevator is broke, So why don't you test it out"
"I'm not trapped in here with all of you, Your all trapped in here with me"
it was the old 253 V8, i think with special carbs, but not that much different to the normal one, with a 4-speed transaxle. Its navigation system was based on magnetic strips in the road and it lit little arrows on the dash
Pssh, Navi is so pointless. My Fox has it; It's sitting in the glovebox right now.
It's called a "map".
Anyways, I'm going to have to second the Alfa 8c Competition, and mention the Audi Avus concept.
Would have been nice if Holden got there way and made the 253 into there new V6.Originally Posted by 2ndclasscitizen
Guess back then that kind of stuff would have been like if we had a auto pilot mode now in cars
"Just a matter of time i suppose"
"The elevator is broke, So why don't you test it out"
"I'm not trapped in here with all of you, Your all trapped in here with me"
No it isn't. It's pointless for highways and other big roads but it's VERY usefull in cities.Originally Posted by Radoman
yeah, it woulda been awesome, it would've pushed the entire engine line-up up a few steps, much more models with the 350 Chev. Pity.Originally Posted by SlickHolden
I still wish they made the 5LT OHC V8Originally Posted by 2ndclasscitizen
It's a shame i think Holden could build a supercar more Grand Tourer if they had the money to waste.
GM does it all the time waste money when they dont have any
"Just a matter of time i suppose"
"The elevator is broke, So why don't you test it out"
"I'm not trapped in here with all of you, Your all trapped in here with me"
The 1933 Dymaxion Car was intended to fly, jump-jet style, when suitable alloys and engines became available. Meantime, it did pretty well on the ground: It got about 30 miles per gallon, and could smoothly hurtle eleven passengers at 120 miles per hour--far better performance than a 1996 minivan.
Though not much heavier that a VW Beetle, the Dymaxion was nearly 20 feet long. That was too big for urban traffic, despite extraordinary maneuverability--it could U-turn in its own length. The adroit rear-wheel steering also proved counterintuitively tricky, especially in a crosswind. A fatal crash, wrongly blamed on the steering instead of the other car involved, was also fatal to investors, and the project failed.
Ten years later, Buckminster Fuller put what he'd learned to work in a much handier five-seater with a tiny engine at each wheel. This time, the front wheels steered, but all three could be steered for tight city turns and crabbing sideways into parking spaces. High speed stability was enhanced by extending the rear wheel on a boom to lengthen the wheelbase.
Cadillac Sixteen (so much classier than the vulgar Maybach)
Bugatti EB112 (so much classier than the Veyron)
speaking of cadillacs, what ever happened to the cien?
Ford GT90 !
damn good!
too good to be true :P
do u hav any pics or specs on the gt90?Originally Posted by GT40
-Fundamentals are a crutch for the talentless.
-I thought the blacks in Baltimore were bad, shit, they’re nothing compared to these fags you got here in San Francisco…haha.
-Kenny Powers
What the Corvair could have been. The Chevrolet Pininfarina Concept.
"Racing improves the breed" ~Sochiro Honda
^^ intruiging. Imho not as sexy as the '65-on factory effort
Can't wait any longer for someone to nominate as a 'could have been' these fantastic Rovers, the P6BS and P9. Mid-engined alloy V8 so an MR2 with balls. Because its such a great website I won't 'borrow' a pic, so check it out yourself
http://www.austin-rover.co.uk/index.htm?p9galleryf.htm
(more info & pic links within, found under Rover P8/P9)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)