Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 46 to 52 of 52

Thread: valve shrouding

  1. #46
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    3,560
    Please post pics when it melts into the engine - I can GARRENTY that JB Weld does NOT have a glass transition temp capable of use close to a combustion chamber.
    Chief of Secret Police and CFO - Brotherhood of Jelly
    No Mr. Craig, I expect you to die! On the inside. Of heartbreak. You emo bitch

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    BODY FILLER ? YOU SERIOUSLY WOULD PUT BODY FILLER NEAR A petroleum based gas/fluid ???

    Thank you and good night hightower99

    OK, folks if there is still anyone even thinking for 1/2 second of following this advice. There is the final nail in the coffin of his "expertise".
    On Bondo's home page you can look up their MSDS handling sheets that gives the warnings. Their body filler is "incompatible with oxiders". All modern fuels have oxidiser additives to promote better burn and less nasty emissions !!!
    So the MANUFACTURER says not to do it. ht. You're just making this up now and got caught with your pants down. BYeeeeeeeeeeeeee
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  3. #48
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,200
    BODY FILLER ? YOU SERIOUSLY WOULD PUT BODY FILLER NEAR A petroleum based gas/fluid ???
    no I wouldn't
    the Bondo body filler is for the shaping process! I only ever suggested that JB weld be used and kept in the system. However Loctite's Metal set has about the same quality. I forgot to write "for shapeing" in the list header.

    Please post pics when it melts into the engine - I can GARRENTY that JB Weld does NOT have a glass transition temp capable of use close to a combustion chamber.
    I haven't heard of a single case of JB weld melting to glass state when used in intake porting... ever! And this porting technique doesn't have the epoxy too close to the combustion chamber anyways. on most cars it would be about a ½ inch away from the intake valve seat. By the way JB Weld is resistant up to 260 Deg Celsius and it will not melt to glass untill about 316 Deg Celsius (note: it takes 10 minutes of exposure to 316deg heat to melt it to glass)
    Power, whether measured as HP, PS, or KW is what accelerates cars and gets it up to top speed. Power also determines how far you take a wall when you hit it
    Engine torque is an illusion.

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    3,560
    Quote Originally Posted by ht
    I haven't heard of a single case of JB weld melting to glass state when used in intake porting... ever!
    If I was stupid enough to fill my engine ports with epoxy and it melted into the engine do you think I would run around and tell everyone?

    Quote Originally Posted by ht
    nd this porting technique doesn't have the epoxy too close to the combustion chamber anyways. on most cars it would be about a ½ inch away from the intake valve seat.
    That’s why you have previously recommended building up the back of the valve seat?

    Quote Originally Posted by ht
    By the way JB Weld is resistant up to 260 Deg Celsius and it will not melt to glass untill about 316 Deg Celsius (note: it takes 10 minutes of exposure to 316deg heat to melt it to glass)
    Again showing a lack of knowledge of material properties.

    In this area (cut and paste from their site) I'd expect "resistant" to mean that the TTG is achieved here (260C) and that the 316C temp to indicate the decomposition point. That the site quotes nice round numbers also makes me very suspicious of these.

    As with all Epoxies this can vary GREATLY depending on if a perfect combination is achieved and that it is perfectly mixed. You would want to test (prior to use) the effect (it can be pretty large, +-20C) of humidity at the time of mixing.

    Please learn what marketing turns engineering descriptions into before you start quoting it as solid engineering, using terms it is now showing you don’t understand.

    How do you propose that the epoxy used lasts a reasonable amount of time given the thermal stresses as the Aluminium head will have a thermal expansion of ~13% and the epoxy normally runs in the 0-2% range (not sure of the effect of the metal in JB Weld on expansion rates, or internal stresses created by theses thermal expansion issues?

    Quote Originally Posted by ht
    I forgot to write "for shapeing" in the list header.
    Please try and limit your forgetfulness - if anyone is willing to try this they need all the protection they can get.
    Chief of Secret Police and CFO - Brotherhood of Jelly
    No Mr. Craig, I expect you to die! On the inside. Of heartbreak. You emo bitch

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,200
    Quote Originally Posted by Cyco
    If I was stupid enough to fill my engine ports with epoxy and it melted into the engine do you think I would run around and tell everyone?
    You mean if I followed Motoman's system and found that it didn't work... Me I would tell the tale, and I am pretty sure that anyone else would too. (Except for you of course)



    Quote Originally Posted by Cyco
    That’s why you have previously recommended building up the back of the valve seat?
    Umm what? I never recommended building up the back of the valve seat... The epoxy in the finished shaped piece will be about ½ inch from the valve seat...



    Quote Originally Posted by Cyco
    Again showing a lack of knowledge of material properties.
    How's that then?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyco
    In this area (cut and paste from their site) I'd expect "resistant" to mean that the TTG is achieved here (260C) and that the 316C temp to indicate the decomposition point. That the site quotes nice round numbers also makes me very suspicious of these.
    Umm you don't need to expect anything it is all there 260C is what it can take indifinately without any damage to whatever you have used it for. (ie it does not turn to glass at this temperature) It does start turning to glass at 315.5555555556C (600F) and they note that it will take one package of it 10 minutes at that temperature to fully turn fluid and glass like!

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyco
    As with all Epoxies this can vary GREATLY depending on if a perfect combination is achieved and that it is perfectly mixed. You would want to test (prior to use) the effect (it can be pretty large, +-20C) of humidity at the time of mixing.

    Please learn what marketing turns engineering descriptions into before you start quoting it as solid engineering, using terms it is now showing you don’t understand.

    How do you propose that the epoxy used lasts a reasonable amount of time given the thermal stresses as the Aluminium head will have a thermal expansion of ~13% and the epoxy normally runs in the 0-2% range (not sure of the effect of the metal in JB Weld on expansion rates, or internal stresses created by theses thermal expansion issues?Please try and limit your forgetfulness - if anyone is willing to try this they need all the protection they can get.
    Perfect combination You mix it 1:1 it isn't hard to do that! and 20C at the high limits it says will not effect overall usefullness. I can only quote what the manufacturer says in there papers. And tell you that it has been used in this fashion many times without failure.

    Cyco you must be smoking something because the thermal expansion of aluminium is (25 °C) 23.1 µm/(m·K) That is nowhere near 13% that is much smaller than 0.001% so I think the epoxy will do just fine!
    Power, whether measured as HP, PS, or KW is what accelerates cars and gets it up to top speed. Power also determines how far you take a wall when you hit it
    Engine torque is an illusion.

  6. #51
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    3,560
    Quote Originally Posted by ht
    Quote Originally Posted by Cyco
    Again showing a lack of knowledge of material properties.
    How's that then?
    Right here in the following statement is a good example:

    Quote Originally Posted by ht
    Quote Originally Posted by Cyco
    In this area (cut and paste from their site) I'd expect "resistant" to mean that the TTG is achieved here (260C) and that the 316C temp to indicate the decomposition point. That the site quotes nice round numbers also makes me very suspicious of these.
    Umm you don't need to expect anything it is all there 260C is what it can take indifinately without any damage to whatever you have used it for. (ie it does not turn to glass at this temperature) It does start turning to glass at 315.5555555556C (600F) and they note that it will take one package of it 10 minutes at that temperature to fully turn fluid and glass like!
    So a very brief vauge description (with very round numbers , published in F - not the conversion YOU have made into C to try and hide this) gives you absolute confidence? Yet another example of lack of knowledge, or is it a desire to decive?

    Quote Originally Posted by ht
    Perfect combination You mix it 1:1 it isn't hard to do that!
    hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha (sorry) That would yet another example, we are talking about squzing goop out a tube, and expecting to be able to squeeze EXACTLY the same amount (to the molecule - that is perfect combination) of a slightly runnier/thicker goop out of another tube. We must bow down to your far superiour knowledge.

    Quote Originally Posted by ht
    the thermal expansion of aluminium is (25 °C) 23.1 µm/(m·K) That is nowhere near 13% that is much smaller than 0.001% so I think the epoxy will do just fine!
    If you look at the number in imperial (13.1 µin/in-°F) its not a "technically correct" description, but one that has been used for a long time, again my apologies for this miss understanding, but please don't insinuate drug use where the issue is an unfimaliraty with the differing terminology (you are new to the area, and I out of it for a little while), is more likly the culprit.

    At this point I will take my leave from this thread, there does not appear to be much more I can add here.
    Chief of Secret Police and CFO - Brotherhood of Jelly
    No Mr. Craig, I expect you to die! On the inside. Of heartbreak. You emo bitch

  7. #52
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    6,065
    Hightower, have you posted any pictures yet of the work that you've done and the dyno sheets?
    "We went to Wnedy's. I had chicken nuggest." ~ Quiggs

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. which variable valve control system is ur favourite?
    By fpv_gtho in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 02-07-2006, 07:59 PM
  2. Radical New Valve Idea
    By deffenbaugh03 in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-14-2005, 04:22 PM
  3. variable valve lift
    By KnifeEdge_2K1 in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 12-08-2004, 09:52 PM
  4. EGR Valve
    By Anubis_4_99 in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-21-2004, 08:07 PM
  5. Stepless throttles VTEC
    By manolis in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-20-2003, 10:21 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •