Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 46

Thread: Mustang or Camaro

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    6,153
    Quote Originally Posted by NoOne
    The 1969 ZL1 COPO Camaro being only 69 made with the all aluminum ZL1 427 rated at 430hp (actual output closer to 565hp), this was COPO order # 9560 as opposed to the 1969 COPO Camaro with the cast iron 427 (the L-72) rated at 425hp COPO order # 9561.

    The ZL1 was dropped in favour of the L-72 due to costs and availability.

    Some pictures here http://www.icehouse.net/camaros/mycopo3.htm
    Hadnt heard of that little gem. Im with you . You know your shit!
    "A string is approximately nine long."
    Egg Nogg 02-04-2005, 05:07 AM

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    35
    Well i dont really like american muscel cars but i would chose an mustang if i had to
    -I live my life a quater mile att a time.
    -It dose“t mater if you win by an inch or an mile, wining“s wining.
    -It dosen“t mater if your car goes 0-60 in 5s if you can“t drive it to the max.
    -I fell the need......the need for speed.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Hamilton Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,860
    Quote Originally Posted by mechanixfetch
    didn't the COPO Camaro run 10.4 second 1/4 miles off the floor? The COPO Camaro was I believe also created without the consent of knowledge of the top Brass and was created in the experimental car plant. I also read that they came with special headers in the trunk just incase the buyer didn't realise he was getting a race car that was sneaked onto the street.
    I've heard that the ZL1 was a 10 second car ... as soon as you put the drag slicks on it.

    Different sites have slightly varying stories on how it was produced without specific consent of upper management, I've seen it said that it was known about but management turned a blind eye, that the cars were assembled after hours and the most likely story was that it was going to head the factory race team.

    As the link I supplied states, 50 cars were ordered, supposedly all going to racers and not for street use, but when word spread among the dealers a total of 69 were made before going to the much cheaper and tamer (figure of speach) L72 (cast iron) engine.

    I believe the headers were installed on the engine, there would be no mistaking this as a race car, the cost of the car itself carried a $4100 premium for the engine package, $7300 in 1969 was a lot for a car, especially when across the road at the Chrysler dealership you could get a serious street/race car in the $4500 Hemi Dart. Serious as in they pulled all the stops and created a devastating car that the prospective owner had to sign a disclaimer for. A really great article on this car HERE.


    I sometimes feel that I was born 20 yrs too late ... not that it would matter, as I'd still be broke.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Hamilton Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,860
    Quote Originally Posted by crisis
    Hadnt heard of that little gem. Im with you . You know your shit!
    Awesome car !!!

    1 part memory + 2 parts research.

    I knew the car existed, I remembered it was 69 cars (69 cars in 1969) and I remembered it was a 10 second (¼ mile) beast that had no cause to fear any of the street hemi cars (hemi Dart is not a street hemi car ... 600+ hp, approx 500 at the rear wheels with locomotive league torque and weighing in under 2200lbs).

    I did have to research as to why there were only 69 cars made when I knew there were over a 1000 COPO camaros built (the balance were cast iron 427's), this led to the discovery of 2 different COPO order #'s and a link with great pics and even more info.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    nr Edinburgh, Whisky-soaked Scotland
    Posts
    27,775
    Quote Originally Posted by NoOne
    I sometimes feel that I was born 20 yrs too late
    Same here, but in my case it's tuned Imps, Escort Mexicos, Chevette 2300HSs and A110s and the ubiquitous Mini

    Cheap(ish) cars in their days and rally-prepped ones with MSA papers are holding crazy prices today
    "A woman without curves is like a road without bends, you might get to your destination quicker but the ride is boring as hell'

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    Posts
    7,833
    BOTH





    flying without wings

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    missouri, stl
    Posts
    978
    Id take a COPO or Yenko camaro,
    but really i'd want (as u'd know if u read a number of my post) The COPO all aluminum 427 lz1 (pretty much the same settup as the camaro)..........CORVETTE, sry but the 67 is just too beutiful
    < 1 - 2 - to the bass >

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Posts
    1,595
    Between the Camaro and the Mustang, I perfer the Camaro, especially a '69 Camaro ZL1. As far as any pony car, definitely a Hemi Cuda is my favorite.
    VIVA FERRARI!!!!!!

    "Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy!" ~ Benjamin Franklin

    If everything's under control, you're going too slow ~ Mario Andretti

    "We can't stop here! This is bat country!" ~ [U]Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas: A Savage Journey into the Heart of the American Dream[/U]

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    3

    Been There Done That

    Personally I would Take the mustang...... I kinda already have 3 Camaros...... Not to mention a partial ownership of 6 1970 chevelles that my best friends Dad owns. (showing off)

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    6

    Mustang by a long shot

    MUSTANG- a great old sports car, brilliant handling, quick acceleration, nice models and plenty of power.(little on the heavy side)
    The new 2004 mustang is a brilliant recreation of the old mustang, and is also a brilliant car.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2
    Oy! Yikes.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Hamilton Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,860
    Quote Originally Posted by speedyone
    MUSTANG- a great old sports car, brilliant handling, quick acceleration, nice models and plenty of power.(little on the heavy side)
    Heavy? Well maybe compared to many Euro and Japanese cars of the time, but definitely not for North American musclecars:
    1964 Mustang with a small block V8...(2850 lbs)
    1969 Mustang with a small block V8...(3100 lbs)
    1969 Mustang with a big block V8.....(3300 lbs)
    1969 Camaro with a small block V8....(3200 lbs)
    1969 Camaro with a big block V8.......(3450 lbs)
    1970 'Cuda with a small block V8.......(3400 lbs)
    1970 'Cuda with a big block V8..........(3600 lbs add another 60-80 lbs for Hemi)
    (weights rounded to the nearest 50 lb)

    Mustangs performed well because they were lighter than their immediate competition, which is just as well because aside from the BOSS 302's 302 cid small block and the Shelby GT350's 289 cid small block, Ford engines were really poorly designed for real performance, having too large ports in the heads to breathe properly (in regards to port velocity not port volume), and not enough cam to compensate. Classic examples are the 351 Cleveland, 390,428 and 429, I left out mention of the 427 SOHC(also known as the cammer) as it was not really a passenger car engine, more of a race engine that found its way into more Galaxies than Ford would like to admit.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    ACT,Canberra Australia
    Posts
    6,086
    Your right about the cammer enguine...fairlane where popular with them too ....the majority became drag ledgend in thier own rights and where bought stripped out and even had fibreglass pannels and stuff...butnow that off subject.....
    The mustangs where about a similar weight to our Falcons over here about 1400 kilos...the thing that bugs me the most about most yank cars is far too many are automotaic...so hard to find a stock manualone...damn lazy nation they are...

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    6,065
    It's not that we're lazy, we just have so many stupid people in our country.
    "We went to Wnedy's. I had chicken nuggest." ~ Quiggs

  15. #30
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    3
    I would take a 1969 z/28 Camaro over any ford anyday, my dad use to have a 69 z/28 with a 383 stroker motor in it. It had 505 HP and like 590 ft pound torque. It was red with black stripes.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Really useful performance listings...
    By Egg Nog in forum Technical forums
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 04-18-2021, 05:13 PM
  2. saleen s7 and mustang
    By rt/10 in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 04-10-2004, 03:27 PM
  3. 9.9 Sec Mustang
    By Niko_Fx in forum General Automotive
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-29-2004, 04:22 PM
  4. Mustang Cobra or Camaro SS?
    By mechanixfetch in forum Car comparison
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-17-2004, 03:38 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •