Audi RS4 vs. Ferrari F430

[Guara0007]

They never were number one on my list......

[McReis]

As someone said long time ago, Ferrari is the most arrogant car company these days, a feeling enhanced by their "supporters". Of course I'd like to try all their range, but if I had to have one everyday I'd rather have a Maserati or an Aston Martin.

Arrogance is not necessarily a bad thing if well supported with facts and achievements. Just like Jose Mourinho.

[IWantAnAudiRS6]

Wich is...???

I would bet my neck as any of you who said would chose the Audi, were in fact in the position of chosing, would immeditely fall for the Ferrari keys. Don't be offended but I think you all say that because the choice it's not for real. It's like comparing Avril Lavigne to Elizabeth Hurley. They both look good, but one of them is a teen and the other a real woman.

It's funny you should say that.

I have a crush on Avril Lavigne, and after seeing both cars yesterday, I'd still take the Audi

[McReis]

I have a crush on Avril Lavigne, and after seeing both cars yesterday, I'd still take the Audi

Sure you do. In case of doubt just check your username.

[Ferrer]

Arrogance is not necessarily a bad thing if well supported with facts and achievements. Just like Jose Mourinho.

How can a Ferrari 575M Maranello be possibly better than say a Lamborghini Murcielago? It sounds and looks worse...

[McReis]

How can a Ferrari 575M Maranello be possibly better than say a Lamborghini Murcielago? It sounds and looks worse...

I was a fan of you posts... should I regret it? Because that post doesn't make much sense. They may be alternatives, but they are very different cars, hardly comparable.
And if I could choose, I'd still go for the 575. It's is older in conception than the Murcielago's, and it does something Lamborghini never tried: a usable car. A high-performance front engined car is not something easy to do.

[Ferrer]

I was a fan of you posts... should I regret it? Because that post doesn't make much sense. They may be alternatives, but they are very different cars, hardly comparable.
And if I could choose, I'd still go for the 575. It's is older in conception than the Murcielago's, and it does something Lamborghini never tried: a usable car. A high-performance front engined car is not something easy to do.

Obviously my previous post was a joke

[McReis]

Obviously my previous post was a joke

I'll sleep better tonight then.

[Ferrer]

I'd still prefer the Lambo though, it has that something you just don't find on modern Ferraris anymore...

[Equinox]

i'll go with Ferrari... even if they were Arrogant, they deserve to be, unless they produce that SUV someone posted before

they have a rich history and if you owned a Ferrari i bet you would be arrogant to... bragging about the fact you have a Ferrari while your freind has a Honda... or worse a smart car!

[Ferrer]

i'll go with Ferrari... even if they were Arrogant, they deserve to be, unless they produce that SUV someone posted before

they have a rich history and if you owned a Ferrari i bet you would be arrogant to... bragging about the fact you have a Ferrari while your freind has a Honda... or worse a smart car!

There's life outside Ferrari. Only in Italy you can choose between Alfa Romeo, Lancia, Lamborghini, Pagani, Maserati and Fiat (I think I haven't forgotten anyone... ). Fiat aside, all of the other manufacturers have worthy cars and/or a history as rich (if not richer) as Ferrari. In my opinion you'll only choose Ferrari without looking or even considering anything else, if a) you can't see past the badge, or b) you're only interested in the figures. Frankly I'm not a) neither b), and I always try to search that extra something, I call it character.

[The_Canuck]

There's life outside Ferrari. Only in Italy you can choose between Alfa Romeo, Lancia, Lamborghini, Pagani, Maserati and Fiat (I think I haven't forgotten anyone... ). Fiat aside, all of the other manufacturers have worthy cars and/or a history as rich (if not richer) as Ferrari. In my opinion you'll only choose Ferrari without looking or even considering anything else, if a) you can't see past the badge, or b) you're only interested in the figures. Frankly I'm not a) neither b), and I always try to search that extra something, I call it character.

I wouldn't say Pagani has more history then Ferrari but i agree with what your saying.

[Ferrer]

I wouldn't say Pagani has more history then Ferrari but i agree with what your saying.

That's why I said "worthy cars and/or a history as rich". Pagani has no history to speak of, but amazing cars and Lancia has a very rich history but quite "not very worthy" cars right now. Maserati has arguably both.

[The_Canuck]

That's why I said "worthy cars and/or a history as rich". Pagani has no history to speak of, but amazing cars and Lancia has a very rich history but quite "not very worthy" cars right now. Maserati has arguably both.

Ahh yes i missed that... Wish there were "worthy" Italian cars here...in good numbers

[Ferrer]

Ahh yes i missed that... Wish there were "worthy" Italian cars here...in good numbers

Well as demonstrated in another thread you seem to have plenty of Alfa Romeos, then there you have your interesting italian cars...