GT500
C6
Enthusiast
The GT500 has a solid rear end, like the GT, but handling is still greatly improved.Originally Posted by taz_rocks_miami
If you look at it closely, there are subtle differences with the "normal" Mustang GT. Look at the front for example. The the GT500 has an independent rear suspension, the GT a solid rear axle, thus handling should be improved in the GT500.
Last edited by taz_rocks_miami; 10-13-2006 at 05:12 PM.
Enthusiast
1.) Its a solid rear end.I would take the GT500. I wouldn't generally compare the two, but the GT500 looks meaner. It has more character than the C6, more attitude. Prolly sounds better too (not that I have heard either of them in real life, I'm just guessing). Oh, and Ford blessed it with an independent rear suspension
2.) The Corvette has had IRS since 1963.
Before you post know WTF your talking about.
Enthusiast
Where do you get your drugs? A glorified hair dressers car is a boxter, a Mustang GT500 is a balls to the wall monster.
Fanatic
Classic post
Just out of curiosity though, which did you vote for?
John says:
so i had to dump acid into the block tank today
i'm afraid to fap
cause i got it on my hands
Enthusiast
neither yet.Classic post
Just out of curiosity though, which did you vote for?
UCP'S Guardian Devil
Are you sure about that Slicks? I've read many a time that the GT500 has an independent rear.
Last edited by taz_rocks_miami; 10-13-2006 at 05:11 PM.
"NEVER ALLOW SOMEONE TO BE YOUR PRIORITY, WHILE ALLOWING YOURSELF TO BE THEIR OPTION"
Fanatic
One of the best things you've ever said.
The Mustang is a big scary monster, not an MX5/Miata.
The GT500, pleaseI want practicality for when I'm shifting people and gear. It's plenty fast anyway, you're kind of restricted to the road you drive on, so what's the point of having a negligible amount of real-world performance and less practicality?
0-60, 0-100 and the quarter mile are not accurate representations of a car's ability to perform. In-gear acceleration is much more important, as it gets you to overtake, and cruising out of harm's way. Just out of interest, what are the in-gear performance times? The important ones are 30-50mph, 50-70mph and 80-100mph.
Enthusiast
Your probably confusing 01-04 Corbas.
http://www.fordvehicles.com/cars/mus...eatures/specs/
Last edited by taz_rocks_miami; 10-13-2006 at 05:11 PM.
Member
Slap some carbon fiber on the Gt500 and it will beat the C6 anytime, i prefer the Gt500 since it seems that it will have more mods than the c6 ever had
Once fanboyism infects you it impares all your judgement.
It's like being drunk, you lack common sense and everyone laughs at you.
Fanatic
ROFLMAO
Oh man, you're a crack up.
How much carbon fibre were you planning on having? The entire body, or the engine as well?
Member
not much, i like the Gt500, even though it outweighed the c6 by a few hundred pounds, it still would be a good street car. put forced induction on it and no c6 is coming close to me.ROFLMAO
Oh man, you're a crack up.
How much carbon fibre were you planning on having? The entire body, or the engine as well?
Once fanboyism infects you it impares all your judgement.
It's like being drunk, you lack common sense and everyone laughs at you.
Enthusiast
The car does have forced induction. It outweighs the C6 by like 700lbs. You can loose alot of weight in the car fast but still some people want a actually drivers car not some ligthned track monster.
UCP biggest mustang lover
Enthusiast
There is no excuse for this, there is a picture of the engine on the first page! You can clearly see the superchager...
Novice
american engines dont really interest me at all.... id say neither and go with a lightweight audi v8
Enthusiast
*shoots himself in the face...*
Ignorance really is bliss eh?
Do your self a favor and research some things before you make comments like these.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote