Originally Posted by
drakkie
How much lives would be saved ?
Think about it, when you have guns available to people, it becomes easy to use. In anger one can easily grab their gun instead of using fists/whatever in which case you have a much larger chance to survive
Also not every government does the right things with it, for example the USA and Israel, but it would save quite some home-kills anyway...
How bad one may be(have) EVERYONE has the right of life.
Guns have been banned in my country, and the death rate of the country by guns which is about half the population and area of carlifonia is almost twice,
not counting death by swords, knives and plain old neck cracking.
i say that better have a self defence option than live in fear that some pyscho bloke might use a gun for the wrong reason.
P.s.
By the way what kind of ga(x+1) pansy would suggest something like that, even in america at least. In england which has the strictest gun control, gun crime has actually increased
Originally Posted by
Benedict D. LaRosa, November 2002
What about the experience of other countries? In 1997, just 12 months after a new gun law went into effect in Australia, homicides jumped 3.2 percent, armed robberies 44 percent, and assaults 8.6 percent. In the state of Victoria, homicides went up 300 percent. Before the law was passed, statistics showed a steady decrease in armed robberies with firearms. In 1998, in the state of South Australia, robbery with a firearm increased nearly 60 percent. In 1999, the assault rate in New South Wales rose almost 20 percent.
Last edited by kigango123; 02-26-2007 at 12:56 PM.
Once fanboyism infects you it impares all your judgement.
It's like being drunk, you lack common sense and everyone laughs at you.