Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 26 of 26

Thread: BMW trying too hard?

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    2,975
    I think the majority of the technology does go to the ability of the car in relation to the road. I still admire BMW for keeping the driver engaged without electronics and chassis rethinks/4wd. Sure idrive is annoying but it suits germans fine. what annoys me more is merc and audi copy with a similar layout (even if they make their MMI etc easier to use). The previous 5-series was verging on perfect. I'd love to have a late 535i. excelent car (Note the V8 engined M5 had the less tactile recirculating ball steering) - so many ask "how can bmw progress?" my answer is ugly/controversial styled cars and copy others.Maybe its the only way a small profit margin industry can sell. Mind you, Richy Hammond says that a dead cat with a bmw badge would sell.
    autozine.org

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Calgary AB
    Posts
    1,580
    BMW is trying to hard to make their cars hideous and confusing

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    brisbane - sub-tropical land of mangoes
    Posts
    16,251
    and overweight

    not a fan of the run crap tires either...
    Andreas Preuninger, Manager of Porsche High Performance Cars: "Grandmas can use paddles. They aren't challenging."

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    4,031
    Quote Originally Posted by Prius View Post
    Like with the iDrive. Come on, you are gonna get pissed having to scroll through three menus to change the radio station when "Hips Don't Lie" comes on.
    Hahhaa Pruis that was very funny! Life is already too complex without having to put up with that sort of shit. Thanx for the giggle


    I remember when I bought a '55 Beetle, handed the cash over ($125) and excitedly asked the seller to explain all the controls. He directed my attention to the barren metal dashboard and said in deadpan fashion: "Right, that's your lights, wipers and choke." That's all I got!

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    7,272
    Quote Originally Posted by jediali View Post
    I still admire BMW for keeping the driver engaged without electronics
    Where's the evidence for that?

    The M5 has two tonnes of electronic equipment aboard that ensures it doesn't drive like a two tonne car; which it wouldn't if they hadn't stuck two tonnes of electronic equipment aboard...

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Posts
    2,975
    Quote Originally Posted by Coventrysucks View Post
    Where's the evidence for that?

    The M5 has two tonnes of electronic equipment aboard that ensures it doesn't drive like a two tonne car; which it wouldn't if they hadn't stuck two tonnes of electronic equipment aboard...
    Hi Coventrysucks, how are you?

    Okay dokey, The M5 is fairly electronic, yes but the BMW is still a dynamically sorted vehicle. The other 5-series dont need those electronics. The e-classs has etc you cant switch off. It thinks it needs to keep braking inner and outer wheels to keep the car in control. The M5 has electronics controling the engine /gearbox but you can disable any dynamic stability control, without the car turning innefective at high speed.....or so I heard. If you want evidence countless video road teasts (TG,FG,whatcar) reveal that mercedes are dynamically short of abiity compared to equivelant BMWs. Its even reflected in their desigh attitudes. Bmw will specify a mechanical differential for the Z4m and the M3 instead of just using an artificial LSD (electronics). I dont particularly like one company over the other-just saying.

    Have an outsstanding day Coventrysucks. Hope its constructive and enjoyable. Bye.
    autozine.org

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Conrod
    Posts
    1,561
    Luxury cars used to be big, comfortable that's it.

    BMW proved that luxury can be fun, sporty, personal ownership experience.

    The formula BMW is trying is simple:

    1. What perception do you think people would have on you seeing you driving a Rolls Royce?

    2. Would you have that hesitant if you're driving around in a Bentley?

    BMW successfully shrug off the image of a "Driver/Butler's luxury car" whereas many others are trying real hard to. I say Audi's the closest to BMW now as where they're trying to project themselves as.
    www.secondaryperspective.blogspot.com

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Detroit
    Posts
    2,176
    Quote Originally Posted by Rockefella View Post
    Well, that's true, but it's not like Mercedes and Audi (mainly Mercedes) don't have a gaggle of stupid tech in their machines that helps them sell to rich savants.

    I'm pretty sure BMW learned their lesson with i-Drive though. I'm actually surprised Apple hasn't sued BMW for their use of a lowercase 'i' in i-Drive actually.
    Yeah, but at least you don't have to scroll through three menus to tune the radio. That is just rediculous and unneeded.

    I think the majority of the technology does go to the ability of the car in relation to the road. I still admire BMW for keeping the driver engaged without electronics and chassis rethinks/4wd. Sure idrive is annoying but it suits germans fine. what annoys me more is merc and audi copy with a similar layout (even if they make their MMI etc easier to use). The previous 5-series was verging on perfect. I'd love to have a late 535i. excelent car (Note the V8 engined M5 had the less tactile recirculating ball steering) - so many ask "how can bmw progress?" my answer is ugly/controversial styled cars and copy others.Maybe its the only way a small profit margin industry can sell. Mind you, Richy Hammond says that a dead cat with a bmw badge would sell.
    That is the way Cadillac is like over here. Everybody is convinced that Cadillacs are the best cars cruising the road. In fact, my dad hates Jeremy Clarkson and thinks he is biased because he gave the CTS-V a bad review. Whenver he watches Top Gear with me, he keeps going on about how JC is biased Euro-trash. It does get annoying. I bet I could grab a pile of my dog's shit and stick a Cadillac badge on it, sell it, and I would make millions.
    I have found a new love in the form of a tristar.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Conrod
    Posts
    1,561
    Cadillacs used to be good luxury maker. Now they're bad BMW/Merc copiers. Oh add to the fact that rappers take em as their ultimate pimp mobiles, and Cadillac follow suit with something to suit their golden tooth tastes - Escalade.

    IMO, that's the most expensive rubbish mad had ever made.
    www.secondaryperspective.blogspot.com

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,350
    I think BMW are in a bit of a crossing-over zone now. They once stated that they are definitely committed to introducing new technologies, but wouldn't introduce any technology that dilutes the pleasure of driving.

    If you ask me, they've introduced quite a bit of the latter lately, which is a shame really. I do think however that they're starting to regain their focus as far as that's concerned. iDrive, for all it's inadequacies, has kicked off something of a fad with the other German manufacturers. It's got a long way to go before being able to be termed as user-friendly, intuitive and an advantage to driving ...but I think they're getting there with every new interpretation of it.
    Slowly.

    The run-flats are still to prove themselves, but I've heard great things of the latest iteration of it on the new 3 coupe. Apparently the suspension setup and run-flats are starting to reach something of a marriage where your teeth won't get knocked out on every bump.
    In some countries where crime is also a big factor this also makes a whole lot of sense where you wouldn't have to stop to replace a tire (potentially a life-threatening thing to do in some corners of the globe). You can simply drive to the safest place (granted it has to be no more than 150km away) and have it replaced there instead.

    What still fails to make sense to me personally is the active-steering. I fail to see the advantage of a system that reduces the turns lock-to-lock at low speeds and automatically adapts it again to suit higher-speeds. Why not just have two settings that the DRIVER (in uppercase since that's what BMW is supposed to focus on) can choose from? One for parking speeds where you would have, say, 2 turns lock-to-lock and another setting for normal driving...

    The other thing is, of course, the styling side of things. They were apparently worried that their styling would get stuck in a rut, specifically making mention of the "same sausage, different sizes" comparison when referring to the 3, 5 and 7 Series cars.
    The solution was to go controversial, and that was certainly achieved. They shook up opinion, where people either hated or kind-of accepted it.
    In the process they've gained some meaningful new styling characteristics, enough to differentiate their different cars from one another.

    What's needed now is for them to return to sanity. By that I mean they should keep everything that works and re-introduce everything from their past styling that works. There's more than enough there to play around with without making it look weird just for the sake of being weird.
    Take the Z4 for example:
    Without that awkward line from the A-pillar to the lower sills, the design already looks infinitely better. And having lines all over the car that link into each-other is a nice touch, but too much of it is, well, just too darn much!

    Most important of all though, they need to shift their focus back to the DRIVER!!! That and the pleasure of driving.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    7,272
    Quote Originally Posted by jediali View Post
    Have an outsstanding day Coventrysucks. Hope its constructive and enjoyable. Bye.
    ktxsbyenow

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. BMW 3-Series (E92) Coupe 2006-2013
    By Vaigra in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 74
    Last Post: 10-27-2010, 03:53 PM
  2. Hide-Out Index
    By Sauc3 in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 06-20-2008, 02:43 AM
  3. BMW StreetCarver 2001
    By Vaigra in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-17-2006, 12:42 AM
  4. BMW Concept Coupe Mille Miglia 2006
    By nopassn in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 05-13-2006, 03:02 AM
  5. Hamann BMW X3
    By McLareN in forum Matt's Hi-Res Hide-Out
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-11-2005, 09:35 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •